[cisco-voip] Latest Cisco TAPS and Shared Lines?

Does Cisco TAPS 11.5 support Shared Lines? In the past I've used UnifiedFX or VoipIntegration.com for TAPS when I had Shared Lines. I assume no changes?

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

Gotcha! --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: Charles Goldsmith

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

The password will not affect the LIC Mac, so you can use a dummy pw to check your settings for AFG. Just can't use it to generate the XML's for the floppy image for installs, with your current pw. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > Believe it or not, our

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

Believe it or not, our password breaks the answer generator. ☹ --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

Biggest issue with the UCCX rehost most folks have is not expecting it and then winding up with a degraded call center until the rehost is complete. The Answer File Generator (https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/applicat/content/cuc-afg/index.html) is a good way to help predict the LMAC, so you can

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

Good question – I’m pretty sure it was v9 that we were running into problems with. Installing on same hardware required a new license re-host. Hopefully the documented behavior for vm’s hold true and I don’t have to worry about a static MAC address on these two HA vms. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

What version was that on? I always make sure to get the platform-config.xml from "utils create report platform" to make sure I don't change anything on these rebuilds. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > > So is this different than physical hardware?

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

So is this different than physical hardware? Because I reinstalled on physical hardware using the _exact_ same settings and had to have the licenses re-issued because the license mac changed. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services

Re: [cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

Thanks Mike, that does help with the explanation as to why. So, in my stated scenario, since the badPwdCount is not being incremented because it's within the N-2, we are safe from brute force attempts, because that would increase the counter. Am I understanding that correctly and we can safely

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

The virtual mac address on the VM does not affect the license MAC generated for the licensing, and it still uses the same old method as previous and your license MAC can be "generated" or seen by using the AFG tool: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/applicat/content/cuc-afg/index.html Taken from that

Re: [cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

Hi Charles, You might want to have your AD guys recheck they're sources. It's a feature from Server 2003, JUST for that reason.

Re: [cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

Based on what the AD gurus told me, it's the way Cisco authenticates from CUCM/CUC, so it would have to be a Cisco change. Anyone in the know at Cisco that can let us know for sure? Thanks! On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > That’s a very interesting

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

It's a License MAC system so same parameters you'd have on CUCM 8.x. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > Just curious what really triggers a license change in UCCx. > > I do know that any re-installation will do it, regardless if it's on the > same

Re: [cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

That’s a very interesting scenario. I’ve always wondered about that. I wonder if there’s a way that AD admins can track authentications from CUCM cluster and apply the lock out rules accordingly? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications

[cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

So, a question out to the community about how you deal with this issue. If an organization is using Webex Messenger for IM and end-users are connecting Jabber to it, along with phone services and voicemail locally, jabber is setup with accounts to authenticate to AD locally. SSO is not in the

[cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

Just curious what really triggers a license change in UCCx. I do know that any re-installation will do it, regardless if it's on the same physical hardware. I'm going to assume that re-installing on virtual equipment will have the same outcome. What if I install on virtual using a static MAC

[cisco-voip] SIP INFO and Jabber

Is there a way to change the way Cisco Jabber clients (11.5) process SIP INFO? I see the client sending SIP INFO related to RFC 5168 (XML Schema) and would like to disable this. Thank you. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net