[cisco-voip] CUC 6 Second Intervals of Silence

2020-02-14 Thread Anthony Holloway
There's post on the ciscoUC subreddit about CUC greetings sounding "garbled" and it turns out there is a small bit of silence being inserted on the wire by CUC. Has anyone here experienced this before? This has been confirmed on 11.0, 11.5, 12.0 and 12.5 so far. https://www.reddit.com/r/ciscoUC/

Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice from Cisco making Secure LDAP mandatory

2020-02-14 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Oh yes. I remember that. Actually, what I remember is the fact they stopped doing that about 6 months before I wanted to request that. I mean, better decision in the long term to move to FQDN, but still. -Original Message- From: NateCCIE Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 11:53 AM To: Lel

Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice from Cisco making Secure LDAP mandatory

2020-02-14 Thread NateCCIE
Or the good old days when you could list an IP Address as a SAN. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 14, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice from Cisco making Secure LDAP mandatory

2020-02-14 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Hey Sally, I agree. Using IP address seems like circumventing the certificate. From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 10:17 AM To: Brian Meade Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice from Cisco maki

Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice from Cisco making Secure LDAP mandatory

2020-02-14 Thread Anthony Holloway
Well, slap my ass and call me Sally. I change an existing secure LDAP setup from FQDN to IP Address and it still works. I'd be curious to know why it functions this way. Seems like an opportunity to exploit the Authentication facet of SSL. *"In addition to encryption, a proper SSL certificate a

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex calling / flex sku’s

2020-02-14 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
My biggest worry is the expiration of the service. We've notoriously been late in renewing our SmartNet/EA in the past. If, with Flex, the expiry is forced, based on a license file, it means we will have to be more diligent. Unfortunately, getting something like this passed requires three or fou

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex calling / flex sku’s

2020-02-14 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
So, yes, in doing this research flex is a bit interesting. Early EAs had different restrictions on license quantity, which can impact a flex purchase. 1:1 may not be possible based on the license allowance ratios in Flex for anonymous phones or general mailboxes. It's also all subscription so

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex calling / flex sku’s

2020-02-14 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Thanks! We only have a short time frame, so, based on my quick research, I think I may postpone the webex calling portion and only go for making our trial webex site full fledged, matching our production site. I’ll have some time to work out what our production webex calling and cc agent solut

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex calling / flex sku’s

2020-02-14 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
We're actually looking to do something similar here. While obv a Cisco account contact should be able to help, I also like to know what I'm dealing with. The Webex Calling datasheets describe different tiers, including basic/enterprise, but under the EA the basic doesn't exist I guess, or at lea