. Especially for overseas deployment where the lead engineer is in 1
location while we have a FE onsite. Typically this FE might not be voice
trained so it take him a long time to read the step by step instructions.
Whole UAT might take 8 to 12 hours to complete...
Regards,
Ki Wi
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019
customer to create a standalone cluster just for UCCX else
potentially it will cost them more $$ to enable end to end encryption on
all existing sites.
The PCI compliance consultant they have hired, recommended them to go
digital phones or analogue phones which is kind of weird.
Regards,
Ki Wi
voice encryption? Turn on TLS v1.1 ? etc?
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Hi Lelio,
great to hear that. I thought that there's some new announcement that
Jabber inbound calls will stop working on iphone which I could have missed
out.
Regards,
Ki Wi
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 12:44 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Sorry, I do t think I answered your question.
>
> A
Hi Lelio,
we don't have APNS enabled yet but users feedback that their iphone
notification stopped working recently after upgrading to latest iOS
software.
Does that mean that even with APNS, only IM notification will come in, call
notification will not?
Regards,
Ki Wi
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2
for this purpose?
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
to customer LAN) and CUCM sits in different
site. In this case, how can I provide MOH to the SIP trunk provider?
Unicast via G.711?
Is there better option out there? I feels that in this case, it's wasting
of bandwidth when all my regular on-net calls are using G.729 only.
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
license? Can it be shared among the
2 clusters?
Let's say 1 cluster will be using 45 CUWL standard licenses while another
one use like 25 CUWL ? Will this lead to any license violation in the PLM?
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip
d , a couple of our agents (but not all)
>>>> both have had their phones restart while in use, and today both had their
>>>> agent go into Reserved state for a couple of minutes before finally
>>>> connecting and allowing them service. Again an
the gateway to end that leg of the call regardless of
> SIP reachability. But I consider that a pretty big if!
>
> -mn
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ki Wi
> *Sent:* December 13, 2017 12:34 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puc
a disconnect tone is detected even
there is a loss of connectivity to CUCM.
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
nd $42 usd recently to get a wildcard SSL (1 year) to solve
all the trouble. I'm lazy.
https://www.ssl2buy.com/alphassl-wildcard.php
Regards,
Ki Wi
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Nathan Reeves <nathan.a.ree...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I've been using it on Lab boxes without issue.
anyone shed a light on this? Have i missed something?
>
> Thank you.
>
> JF
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Re
roups.
>>
>> See here for a little more info on that:
>> https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/video-over-ip/sip-
>> options-ping-and-session-server-group-on-dial-peer/td-p/2994584
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 9:56 PM Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Saranyan,
thanks! I would like to know how can I compose an access-list to detect SIP
option ping and prioritize it.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, saranyan k <saranyan2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ki Wi,
>
> OPTIONS ping is a SIP message. Ideally the transport mode
ault. This make things more complex,
I have no idea it is TCP or UDP or ???
With no access to customer network (unable to do wireshark), I would like
to see if there's anyone having the experience to prioritize those SIP
option ping packets?
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
__
I think I got the answer. I suppose this problem is there since day 1.
Never encounter this before as those dial-peer towards PSTN usually I will
put 9T.
In this specific gateway, it's .T .
New learning experience for me.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com>
at 09:09, Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu> wrote:
>
>> You can do things like "no voice hunt unassigned-number" and "no voice
>> hunt invalid-number" on IOS to keep it from trying more dial-peers.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Ki Wi <
that matches the DID range and block it.
This means that incoming dialed number will match to 4 dial-peers (100,
200, 250 and 300)
After failing on 100 and 200, the call gets block on dial-peer 250.
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-
CUCM
11.5 .
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
gt;> a conform-action which just applies to burst traffic you can configure.
>> There's no upper limit if you configure the exceed-action to remark and
>> transmit.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Group,
is
1) policing only kicks in when there's congestion?
2) if the policing command is configured to remark traffic only (no drop)
for violate action. What will happen? Traffic will still flow, no upper
limit?
Will it starve other policy map?
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
Doug
> Anderson <doug.ander...@cdw.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 18 April 2017 at 1:44 am
> *To: *Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>, Ki Wi <
> kiwi.vo...@gmail.com>, "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject: *Re: [
Hi Group,
Since Mediasense have announced EoS. Is there any Linux based voice
recording system in the market?
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
that it have sufficient power
to run CUE virtual.
The VM indicates that it needs minimum 1Ghz but doesn't indicate the
processor type...
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco
Guys,
any comment? Ideally going spark is the best but the lack of voice
gateways/ direct sip trunk support seems to force us back to hybrid model?
Regards,
Ki Wi
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
> you are right regarding the phone
. At least we can tell them that when using
deskphone, quality is guarantee.
Regards,
Ki Wi
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:12 PM, James Buchanan <james.buchan...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't believe that's the case. According to Cisco, you register the
> phones directly to Spark
han...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if a cloud-based solution such as Spark wouldn't make more sense
> than implementing an on-premise system.
>
> James
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Group,
>> I have th
? Since they have small amount of users, having multiple
clusters might not make sense and the users will be roaming across cluster
often + I don't see any benefits by doing so?
--
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
ther device
> that did not have the cert, login would fail. But more traditional 2FA
> would use TOTP which can be integrated with both ADFS and OpenAM.
>
>
>
> On 2016-04-07 15:48, Ki Wi wrote:
>
> Daniel,
> for 2 ways intra-domain federation. I suppose if cover
Daniel,
for 2 ways intra-domain federation. I suppose if covers scenario whereby
some users are on Jabber and some users are on SfB as documented.
For example user "Ki Wi, k...@mycompany.com" uses SfB clients and uses
cisco hardphone. I answered on my hardphone. Will IM update SfB
sway for free right? I saw
on other threads here. Someone answered yes.
Regards,
Ki Wi
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Matt Slaga (AM) <
matt.sl...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> Another option, although not perfect, is using a hardware device like a
> Kuandobox.
>
>
>
> ht
way to achieve presence synchronization between UCM and Skype
presence service?
Assuming they are using the same URI ?
+
Able to leverage on UCM to receive and initial calls.
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
h
34 matches
Mail list logo
