Check out telemetry:
https://blogs.cisco.com/developer/model-driven-telemetry-sandbox
You can have the gateway stream data to the collector (such as Telegraf).
This works great for streaming the number of channels in use for ISDN. There
are probably similar models for SIP.
> On Apr 17, 2023, a
Specific License Reservation (SLR) is the best way to resolve the UCCX Smart Licensing defects. Once applied and rebooted you have blissful silence from the eternal Smart Licensing failures.On Apr 11, 2023, at 19:23, JASON BURWELL wrote:
My experience has always been that the new licenses
Missed that someone else already mentioned the region. Sorry.On Jan 27, 2023, at 09:42, Gentoo wrote:Is “Retry Video Call as Audio” checked on the SIP trunk to the SBC?You could try setting the Maximum Session Bit Rate for Video & Immersive video calls to 0 for the region used for the SBC
Is “Retry Video Call as Audio” checked on the SIP trunk to the SBC?You could try setting the Maximum Session Bit Rate for Video & Immersive video calls to 0 for the region used for the SBC. So long as that region is only used for the SBC and you don’t ever need video across the SBC.On Jan 27, 2023,
Has anyone used FXO ports on the VG400s?
Any caveats routing calls from the FXO port to CUCM over SIP?
Or sending calls to analog paging systems via FXO?
Any info would be helpful. Thanks!
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://
No issues with 7.0.3 for UCCE 12.5, Expressway, CUCM 12.5/14, CUC 12.5 for me.
7.0.3 is an iffy esxi release though, be sure to read the vmware notices
regarding it, depending on your environment and which 7.0.3 release you are on
https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/86287
> On Mar 25, 2022, at 15:
Just fyi VG20x XM end of sale date is April 29, 2022.
Replacement product is VG400 series at a higher price if you just want FXS
ports.
ATA-191 are an option, but the CUCM version doesn’t support power denial.
> On Jan 25, 2022, at 14:43, Adam Pawlowski wrote:
>
> Sort of a derail, but years
Some SUs of UCM 11.5 are on the list.
Here’s an aggregate list for multiple vendors:
https://gist.github.com/SwitHak/b66db3a06c2955a9cb71a8718970c592
> On Dec 13, 2021, at 10:24, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> yet
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Kent
> Roberts
> S
Is one system observing Daylight Savings Time and the other is not?
> On Sep 17, 2021, at 08:14, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
> Here is another one that failed... but the timestamp is not off...
>
> 2021-09-15 16:06:26,226 DEBUG [http-nio-81-exec-4] fappend.SamlLogger -
> SAML2Utils.checkCon
Is there valid TLS trust between UCM and Idp?
> On Sep 16, 2021, at 19:46, Johnson, Tim wrote:
>
>
> Nah, looks like he said logging into CCM Admin pages, with AD accounts, so
> all areas of the web UI (I believe). The NTP errors that I’ve seen are
> presented as SAML assertion errors.
>
>
UCM 14 isn’t listed in PCD 12.6’s supported tasks in
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/pcdadmin/12_5_1/cucm_b_pcd-admin-guide_126/cucm_b_pcd-admin-guide_126_chapter_011.html
It is in PCD 14
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/pcdadmin/14/cucm_b_pcd-ad
What ES (if any) are you running?
> On Jul 3, 2021, at 12:31, James Dust wrote:
>
>
> Afternoon all,
>
> We have recently moved our users on a version ‘’12.5.1’’ UCCX cluster, and
> apparently our supervisors were able to access skill’s page on the previous
> version via this link ‘’ https
Hello,
Is there a documented maximum file size UCCX (11.5) can upload with HTTP POST?
Is there a supported way to increase this?
Thanks,
Gentoo
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Lelio,
Just a guess but is 192.8.112.0 an IP address in your voice environment?
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 08:19, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> 7342272
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Of course they have:
https://jaspervanloenen.com/web-training-collar/
> On Feb 2, 2018, at 10:04, Haas, Neal via cisco-voip
> wrote:
>
> Has anyone developed a Network attached electric zap…….
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben
> Amick
> Sent:
You can have the same VLAN ID on different switches without issue.
This works fine:
Switch A has vlan 100 and 200 and NIC A is trunking VLANs 100 and 200 to Switch
A.
Switch B has vlan 100 and 200 and NIC B is trunking VLANs 100 and 200 to Switch
B.
As long as those are truly different/isolat
gent monitoring. As well as reviews of Finesse under UCCE
and its integrated silent monitoring.
Thanks,
Gentoo
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
190/1-1/english/release-notes/ata190-rn-112.html?mdfid=286248743
Are use using the latest device pack on UCM?
http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074299/124017/cmterm-devicepack10.5.2_12014-1_Release_Notes.pdf
-Gentoo
On 2015-05-26 15:57, Alessandro Bertacco wrote:
Hi all, we have issue
t there yet. It
still feels like going to a dentist which uses improper equipment and
training to have a tooth drilled with as trying to have
licens...@cisco.com fulfill a manual order correctly in the first few
attempts, let alone a timely manner.
-Gentoo
On 2015-05-22 09:22, Anthony Holl
licenses?
Thanks,
Gentoo
On 2015-04-29 13:09, Charles Goldsmith wrote:
Open a licensing case with the usual info (contract, SO#, etc) and
request that they be converted.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:51 AM, wrote:
Any pointers to a process to convert/upgrade CUWL 9.x licenses to CUWL
10.x
rs display "Insufficient Licenses" when one or
more users requires a license.
Thanks,
Gentoo
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Any change if you allow h323 to h323 and disable toll fraud prevention?
voice service voip
no ip address trusted authenticate
allow-connections h323 to h323
What does "debug voip dialpeer" show when the call is coming from
Asterisk? Which dial-peer do you intend for incoming calls from
Aste
Oh, I missed that part completely.
On 2015-04-23 13:50, Rasim Duric wrote:
Thank you again Gentoo. There is a slight miscommunication here, my
two servers are not in a Unity Connection cluster. These are
independent servers, a CUC digital networking is established though.
Rasim Duric
Network
y.
Verify license is applied on both pub and sub
The process is similar for the sub, the CUC docs should be enough for
that.
On 2015-04-23 09:22, Rasim Duric wrote:
Thank you Gentoo. This is very useful. Our plan is to test and perform
the upgrades in an off-line network. Once all is done, sh
Its also possible to do this without COBRAS or DRS.
Basically you just replace each node one at a time on the current
version but running on the new HW.
Once you have the current version running on the new hardware you
upgrade as usual. (Don't forget to get your 7.x licenses ahead of time
fo
I haven't personally seen this, but did see this possibly related bug:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuu02593
Symptom:
Slow response 3-5 seconds entering chat
Conditions:
Jabber 10.x with KB3038314 installed.
Workaround:
remove KB3038314
On 2015-04-21 04:57, Antonis Kouloglou wrote
There probably isn't anything besides a little time and effort stopping
you from growing the partitions. You should be able to use regular
Linux tools to extended these partitions (if need be creating a new VMDK
and copying each partition to it and expanding it to the desired size.)
Something
I thought the goal was to disconnect the call, when there were no logged
in members?
The options for the hunt list would seem to provide this. It is
probably worth checking to see how the call is disconnected, similar to
be failed call from a translation pattern or a normally cleared call.
Are you using a version of UCM with native call queuing?
Instead of routing the call to CUC you could try sending it to a hunt
list with queuing enable, that has no logged in members that is set to
disconnect the call.
On 2015-03-18 01:33, James Andrewartha wrote:
Hi list,
Is there a way in
Possibly an SSL/TLS issue.
Can you get a packet capture of the CUE trying to connect?
CUE traces of the process as well?
Just a guess, but if you don't have a trusted CA installed on the CUE
that trusts Gmail's SSL cert, this probably won't work. Haven't played
with SMTP/ssl on CUE, but this
If you have access to the same CCO account that they licenses were
issued to, you should be able to this with PLM without a TAC case.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/plm/10_5_1/userguide/CPLM_BK_UD1156AD_00_user-guide-rel-1051/CPLM_BK_UD1156AD_00_user-guide-rel-1051_chapt
Jonathan,
Are you trying to move these to a non-ELM/PLM server or just migrate
ELM/PLM to a new server?
If you are migrating ELM/PLM there is a self service tool that can do
this now.
On 2015-03-05 14:19, Jonathan Charles wrote:
Cool, let me try that...
Jonathan
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2
Chris,
That is good news, I look forward to seeing those features in
MediaSense.
Is MediaSense 11.x likely to be released at the same time with UCM 11.x?
Thanks!
On 2015-03-03 16:24, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote:
While it doesn't help you with your current query, I can tell you that
we have l
I'm looking for a recommendation on a MediaSense interface that provides
access to call recordings.
It would need to be able to support multiple MediaSense clusters, other
QM features aren't a requirement.
Live monitoring would be a plus, but not a requirement.
It's rather frustrating that M
Anyone have any guesses for the date when CUCM 11.0 hits CCO?
Its starting to show as the latest version in some places:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-version-11-0/model.html
___
cisco-voip
Since you want to break it...
If you change the NTP server and reboot it should recalculate the
license MAC. Changing the NTP server back should restore the original
license MAC after another reboot. Maybe that will be enough to clear
our the old license information.
Otherwise, you could r
sip-ua
retry invite 2
timers trying 100
On 2015-02-05 12:32, Brian Meade wrote:
Hey all,
Does anyone know a SIP equivalent of "h225 timeout tcp establish"?
The default SIP TCP timeout is 5 seconds:
001306: Feb 4 20:44:34.164: %VOICE_IEC-3-GW: SIP: Internal Error
(Socket error): IEC=1.1.186
Not sure why this didn't hit the list the first time I sent it, maybe
its just slow.
Anyways:
sip-ua
retry invite 2
timers trying 100
On 2015-02-05 12:32, Brian Meade wrote:
Hey all,
Does anyone know a SIP equivalent of "h225 timeout tcp establish"?
The default SIP TCP timeout is 5 second
You could also add "voice-class sip options-keepalive" under the
dial-peers and they will be disabled when they are unreachable. You can
see their status with "sh dial-p v s".
On 2015-02-05 12:32, Brian Meade wrote:
Hey all,
Does anyone know a SIP equivalent of "h225 timeout tcp establish"?
uidance of TAC - and
see notes in VCS Cluster deployment guide. You will destroy data so if
it is not saved elsewhere it will be lost forever
Has anyone else encountered this bug? If so, what caused it, and how
was it resolved?
-Gentoo
___
This could probably be accomplished this with a layer 2 filtering
bridge. Either with a Linux VM with multiple tagged VLANs or an ASA in
transparent mode with multiple tagged VLANs for each host (or group of
hosts you want to filter).
You would need to place the layer 2 filtering bridge betwe
Is "Enable status poll" checked for the port on the MGCP device?
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/71647-busy-out-c-chan-ccm.html
On 2015-02-03 10:43, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
double dang. not working. following notati
Assuming that you don't care about dropping any active calls:
controller t1 X/X/X
shutdown
Otherwise, you could busy out the channels that are not in use (sh isdn
service to see status).
interface SerialX/X/X:23
isdn busy b_channel 0-24
On 2015-02-03 08:42, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
Good mor
43 matches
Mail list logo