Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x and RightFax SR140 v10

2015-08-18 Thread Daniel Pagan
: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 6:45 PM To: Daniel Pagan Cc: Countryman, Edward ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x and RightFax SR140 v10 I wonder if you have prack enabled if it is a SIP trunk so that early media can be cut through before the connect. Sent from my iPh

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x and RightFax SR140 v10

2015-08-18 Thread NateCCIE
I wonder if you have prack enabled if it is a SIP trunk so that early media can be cut through before the connect. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 18, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Daniel Pagan wrote: > > "there’s no way to inject the CNG tone" > > Sorry - I should be more specific. What I mean to say is t

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x and RightFax SR140 v10

2015-08-18 Thread Daniel Pagan
"there’s no way to inject the CNG tone" Sorry - I should be more specific. What I mean to say is that there's no way to inject the tone from a Cisco device, but don't know of the capabilities of the RightFax server. I'm curious to know if you find an option for generating a CNG tone on RightFa

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x and RightFax SR140 v10

2015-08-18 Thread Daniel Pagan
Behalf Of Countryman, Edward Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:52 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x and RightFax SR140 v10 We’ve gone live with the new RF SR140 F0Ip environment a couple of months ago. For the most part, things are working great. There are a couple of

[cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x and RightFax SR140 v10

2015-08-18 Thread Countryman, Edward
We’ve gone live with the new RF SR140 F0Ip environment a couple of months ago. For the most part, things are working great. There are a couple of destinations however that we don’t seem to be able to successfully send to, even though I can send from the standalone fax machine in my office ever