ustom SQL reports we export our CDR into so I don’t think I’d be
>> able to get it for my org unless I were to front it myself or find a
>> considerable ROI to pull out of it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ben Amick
>>
>> Unified Communications Analyst
>>
>>
gt;
>
> *From:* Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 12, 2017 12:39 PM
> *To:* Ben Amick
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?
>
>
>
> Ben, you can glean this info via CDR if you arc
It uses data from a db table called registrationdynamic.
From what I recall this is only updated once per day (around midnight by
default) so last registered will only get you to within a 24-hour period. To
find the specific time the phone unregistered you have to go to the syslogs.
As an examp
The RIS Database contains a LastActTimeStamp field which is when that
device last registered in Epoch time.
The problem is you have to cross-reference between nodes as a device may
have last registered to the publisher 2 years ago but is currently
registered to a subscriber node.
The new feature
7 12:39 PM
> *To:* Ben Amick
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?
>
>
>
> Ben, you can glean this info via CDR if you archive those, but not an easy
> task. Variphy has a report to pull this type of info from CDR and is quit
Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:56 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?
I haven’t seen it mentioned before, but I feel like it’s a common thing to go
through an audit old phones in the environment, but other than looking throu
t;
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net
> ] *On Behalf Of *Ben Amick
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:56 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?
>
>
>
> I haven’t seen it mentioned before, b
2vS9MGvkzbWoJmAW6RjWNR2kX4MkjY-loj-Ne5jWApvjBPqqb9EVjdwIqid40r3rjApYQg1TCpmYQg0eTYiN8SCUrf6Dk>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben
Amick
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:56 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
t;https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben
Amick
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:56 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?
I haven't seen it mentioned before, but I fe
t;https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben
Amick
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:56 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?
I haven't seen it mentioned before, but I fe
I haven't seen it mentioned before, but I feel like it's a common thing to go
through an audit old phones in the environment, but other than looking through
lists of terminated users and cross referencing active users, I can't think of
any good way to audit phones to see if they're alive anymore
11 matches
Mail list logo
