Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

Super! Thanks. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 28, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Charles Goldsmith > wrote: I should have looked at that link a bit closer, it doesn't mention the cop file:

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

Yep. Besides the steps in docs above, The expand space cop file if the upgrade needs you to change the disk space for new version per OVA template specs. The RTMT low watermark trick works very well, but sometimes doesn't free up quite enough so then you need to manually go find files to clear.

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

I should have looked at that link a bit closer, it doesn't mention the cop file: http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282204704/18582/CleanupCommonCOPfilev1.4.pdf Which is the 3rd method, but there is a caveat, so read it closely. On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Charles Goldsmith

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

There is! http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_CM_L2_Upgrade_Disk_Space_issues#Free_Up_Space_for_Unified_CM_L2_Upgrade.C2.A0 That entire page is good reading. On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > Are there instructions on how to free up disk space? >

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

Are there instructions on how to free up disk space? Sent from my iPhone On Aug 27, 2017, at 11:18 PM, Erick Bergquist > wrote: I've done a few dozen inplace upgrades of CUCM, Unity, UCCX with existing VMs with no real issues over the past few

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

I've done a few dozen inplace upgrades of CUCM, Unity, UCCX with existing VMs with no real issues over the past few years. Talking 8.x to 10.x or 11.x or 9.x to 10/11.x. Issues encountered: Freeing up disk space on existing VM for the RU/SU to install on a few upgrades (more of a slow down)

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

Why not just come along with me on my next upgrade. You can feel the pain...err excitement, of planning and executing an upgrade in the real world. ;) On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:52 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) wrote: > Thanks everyone for the feedback. > > We are looking at

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

Thanks everyone for the feedback. We are looking at ways to make upgrades easier and stories like these are very helpful. -Ryan On Aug 24, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Scott Voll > wrote: 1. I'm guessing we are 10% True bugs and 90% environment, but I

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

1. I'm guessing we are 10% True bugs and 90% environment, but I will agree with other comments about DNS and NTP being a dumb reason to fail 2. as for time, over the years we used to spend over 6 months on upgrades.. we are down to about 2 months. in our enviroment we have to document all

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

1. That's kind of a loaded question. 90% bugs where bugs also includes the system is "functioning as designed". Most failures I've encountered, as a partner, occur as a result of the applications heavy reliance on DNS (if configured) and NTP. Would be nice if there was an option to bypass

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

ence and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:38 AM > To: cisco-voip list > Subject: [cisco-voi

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

I would tend to agree that the overall installation process could improve (not that I want to give up my ANSI art or anything). Most of the installation process today is merely an extension of the underlying Linux kernel. I would settle for more verbose feedback when errors are encountered,

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

But Anthony, we all know you are an over achiever! And that's ok, it makes you one of our experts on here too... On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow, it's kind of cool that you're even asking. Thanks for that. > > Already I can see

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

Wow, it's kind of cool that you're even asking. Thanks for that. Already I can see this is going to be a wide gap in responses. Partner vs end user, this customer vs that customer, this version vs that version, this scenario vs that one, and on, and on, and on. 1) I feel like it's always a bug

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

oun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <rratl...@cisco.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:37 AM To: cisco-voip list Subject: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll Quick 2 question poll, feel free to unicast or share your response with the group. 1. When you or your customers have

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

To: cisco-voip list <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll Quick 2 question poll, feel free to unicast or share your response with the group. 1. When you or your customers have a UCM or IMP upgrade fail, what percentage of failures are due to a bug vs som

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

-Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:38 AM To: cisco-voip list Subject: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll Quick 2 question poll, feel free to unicast or share your response

[cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

Quick 2 question poll, feel free to unicast or share your response with the group. 1. When you or your customers have a UCM or IMP upgrade fail, what percentage of failures are due to a bug vs something in the environment (user error, db updates, etc)? % bug: % not a bug: Yes it’s a very