Ah - now that's useful. I guess with that we could start egtting some
definitions worked out. I'll look into it. Can you post your source
code so
we can test?
It's nothing impressive at all just a nasty hack really! Also I've
only been working with version 7.0 so probably easier just to explain
> From: Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-devel] OSX resource forks
>
> Hey there, sorry it's been a while since I last said anything about
> clamav for OS X. I've had the flu and the computer was the very last
> thing on my mind!
>
Hope
folks, at least by email. Amazing how many it stops!
From: Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:36:03 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-devel] OSX resource forks
Hi Gavin (and list),
I'm nearly finished a GUI for Clamav, the o
the virii
from the Windoze folks, at least by email. Amazing how many it stops!
> From: Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:36:03 +0100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-devel] OSX resource forks
>
> Hi
Hi Gavin (and list),
I'm nearly finished a GUI for Clamav, the only thing I really have left
to do is stress testing and documentation.
I've made a few changes to the source code which I plan to release in
due course, in order to make it work with resource forkshowever,
like you, I don't ha
Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask this but it seemed more of a
development question than a user one.
I have been testing clamav on OSX and noticed that it does not scan Mac
resource forks, only data forks - which is to be expected as it is a
unix-level port, and most of the ways to get a
