Re: [Clamav-users] crashat rpms and glibc

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:35:32 -0400 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Bruns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The RPM builds the milter automatically. You'll need to edit the clamav.spec in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS, and remove the milter config option, then remove the milter path towards the bottom of the

[Clamav-users] Possible virus string found

Tried to search for an awnser but no luck... Anyone have a clue where to look for the solution on passing the files blocked by this condition ? Our organisation gets allot of word documents blocked with this error... Thanks in advance Chris

[Clamav-users] freshclam on cobalt raq550

Hi, I am trying to update the definitions, but i always get the error. SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES I have installed the gmp-devel package but still the error... Any ideas? Alex

[Clamav-users] Please stop sending bug reports to mailing lists

All ClamAV bug reports should only be sent to bugs*clamav.net. Sending unprotected attachments which may cause clamd or other ClamAV related software to crash is a manifestation of irresponsibility and lack of common sense ! -- oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam on cobalt raq550

On Wednesday 07 July 2004 1:34 pm, Alexander Fossa wrote: Hi, I am trying to update the definitions, but i always get the error. SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES I have installed the gmp-devel package but still the error... Any ideas? Have you recompiled freshclam

Re: [Clamav-users] crashat rpms and glibc

Quoting Brian Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:35:32 -0400 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Bruns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The RPM builds the milter automatically. You'll need to edit the clamav.spec in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS, and remove the milter config option, then remove the

RE: [Clamav-users] OLE Problem WARNING: not scanned; untested bigblock size - please report

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Trog Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 4:02 AM On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 15:27, Samuel Benzaquen wrote: Then searching the changelog I found that it was fixed to skip 'probably corrupt' OLE files, so I tried with 0.74 and the result was:

[Clamav-users] i386 precompiled or compiling on i686. Is there a difference in performance?

Hello all, We have been using dag's i386 rpm and we're wondering if there are some optimizations done for i686 processors that would worth compiling it ourselves. (Or asking dag to compile some in i686 ;) Thanks, Samuel Benzaquen --- This

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgraded kernel causing problems

So is this officially considered a bug since I haven't seen any kind of response in the last few days? Should I submit a bug report? -- Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hindsight is an exact science. This one time, at band camp, Steve Lenti wrote: I am currently running a RH9 system with 2.4.21

Re: [Clamav-users] crashat rpms and glibc

On Wednesday, July 07, 2004 2:58 AM [EST], Brian Morrison wrote: No, just supply --without milter as an argument to the rpmbuild command, I do: rpmbuild -bb --without milter clamav.spec and it just works. You do need the bzip2-devel package installed though. Eh, I'm used to stripping

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgraded kernel causing problems

This one time, at band camp, Steve Lenti wrote: I am currently running a RH9 system with 2.4.21 kernel. I have upgraded the kernel to 2.4.26, but clamav will not work. I have recompiled under the new kernel but for some reason I cannot get clamdscan or clamscan to work. I keep getting

[Clamav-users] Problem compiling clamdmail on Tru64

Hello Friends. I'm installing clamdmail on Tru64 4.0F running Digital Unix OS, It is an alpha server of 64bits. In this moment clamav is work fine, but I need install clamdmail for replace amavis, because amavis have problem with CPU usage. It use very CPU and my system is very slow. When I am