-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Horne
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2005 4:47 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Clamav Loops infinitely
On Monday 02 May 2005 06:45, Jeff Parson wrote:
> Clam AV was installed from the Swer
Hey Friends,
I have configured a Mail Server on FC3(Fedora Core 3) a Redhat
Product.The Mail Server MTA is Postfix and Pop Server is Dovecot.I
have few questions.
a) I have installed clamav.083 on FC3 I will make sure that I update
it soon.As the Mail Server is running on FC3 how do I make clamav
Jeff Parson wrote:
> > Try downloading from www.clamav.net
> Thanks for that could you point me to a good how to install this file
That is the purpose of the README/INSTALL files in the source
distribution.
Might one ask, BTW, that if you reiterate a fault from a post somewhile
back, to repo
Hi,
Today I noticed the following error in the /var/log/clamd.log
Mon May 2 11:37:46 2005
-> /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20050502T113718-10465/parts/p004: Input/Output
error ERROR
I've never seen this error before in the log. Yesterday I've upgraded clamav
from 0.83 to 0.84. Is this related to th
On Mon, 2 May 2005 14:07:07 +0200
Filbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I noticed the following error in the /var/log/clamd.log
>
> Mon May 2 11:37:46 2005
> -> /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20050502T113718-10465/parts/p004:
> Input/Output error ERROR
>
> I've never seen this error bef
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 15:45 +1000, Jeff Parson wrote:
> Clam AV was installed from the Swerts-Knudsen.dk install file from his
> web site to SME Server 6.0.1.01 and Clamav 0.84. Sme is loaded on a no
> name Celeron 566 with 64mb ram
So, if you keep a "nice top" running in another window, does the
Hi,
I've captured a copy of an email that looks like it's causing clamav to
loop.
It does it with both clamdscan and clamscan. (Version 0.84).
Would the devs like a copy and if so, where should I send it.
Regards,
Rick
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 16:20, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've captured a copy of an email that looks like it's causing clamav to
> loop.
>
> It does it with both clamdscan and clamscan. (Version 0.84).
>
> Would the devs like a copy and if so, where should I send it.
Send it to me, please
Jeff Parson wrote:
> Clam AV was installed from the Swerts-Knudsen.dk install file from his
> web site to SME Server 6.0.1.01 and Clamav 0.84. Sme is loaded on a no
> name Celeron 566 with 64mb ram which is used as a mail server running
> qmail. It all worked fine on AV .80 but began to go pear sha
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 16:20, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've captured a copy of an email that looks like it's causing clamav to
> loop.
>
> It does it with both clamdscan and clamscan. (Version 0.84).
>
> Would the devs like a copy and if so, where should I send it.
Thank you for the sam
* Rob MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, there are a number documented on the ClamAV site:
>
> http://www.clamav.net/3rdparty.html#proxy
>
> But, of course, you've already looked there :-)
I checked out several of those and DansGuardian seems to be the most
"complete" solution when it comes
ankush grover wrote:
>Hey Friends,
>
>I have configured a Mail Server on FC3(Fedora Core 3) a Redhat
>Product.The Mail Server MTA is Postfix and Pop Server is Dovecot.I
>have few questions.
>
>a) I have installed clamav.083 on FC3 I will make sure that I update
>it soon.As the Mail Server is runni
If I do the #24 testvirus test ( http://www.webmail.us/testvirus ), the
mail is delivered properly (which is fine, because there's no virus in
there), but I also get a little file in /var/tmp/clamav-partial named
something like partialmsg### that doesn't go away.
Inside the file is the data po
Hi,
Logwatch reported outdated warning as follows:-
**Unmatched Entries**
SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES: 3 Time(s)
Received signal 15, terminating: 7 Time(s)
Received signal 14, wake up: 333 Time(s)
WARNING: Local version: 0.83 Recommended version: 0.84: 24 Time(
Have you restarted the clamd processes?
> Hi,
>
> Logwatch reported outdated warning as follows:-
>
> **Unmatched Entries**
>SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES: 3
> Time(s)
>Received signal 15, terminating: 7 Time(s)
>Received signal 14, wake up: 333 Time(s)
>WAR
Have you restarted the clamd processes?
I had the machine rebooted after I upgraded clamav
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
List said:
> Hi,
>
>
> But I had already updated it 5mins after it was released.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] nham]# clamscan -V
> ClamAV 0.84/862/Mon May 2 20:24:27 2005
>
> Please help.
Something you're sure of is wrong. You appear to have more than one
installation on your system, or your installati
List wrote:
Have you restarted the clamd processes?
I had the machine rebooted after I upgraded clamav
Just updated 2 boxes w/ no problem on my end..
?? I'm assuming you remembered to run "make install" ??
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.
> Have you restarted the clamd processes?
I had the machine rebooted after I upgraded clamav
Well, I just upgraded mine and clamd -V shows version 0.84
now.
Here is my before and after log from updating:
ClamAV update process started at Mon May 2 10:46:03 2005
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is
> > Have you restarted the clamd processes?
>
> I had the machine rebooted after I upgraded clamav
>
Well, I just upgraded mine and clamd -V shows version 0.84
now.
Here is my before and after log from updating:
ClamAV update process started at Mon May 2 10:46:03 2005
WARNING: Your ClamAV ins
> --
> ClamAV update process started at Tue May 3 02:36:01 2005
> main.cvd is up to date (version: 31, sigs: 33079, f-level:
> 4, builder: tkojm)
> daily.cvd is up to date (version: 863, sigs: 973, f-level:
> 4, builder: diego)
>
> Can I now presume that I ha
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:39:42AM +0800, List wrote:
[...]
>WARNING: Local version: 0.83 Recommended version: 0.84: 24 Time(s)
>See the FAQ at http://www.clamav.net/faq.html for an explanation.: 3
> Time(s)
>freshclam daemon 0.83 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686): 8 Time(s)
>
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:39:42AM +0800, List wrote:
[...]
WARNING: Local version: 0.83 Recommended version: 0.84: 24 Time(s)
See the FAQ at http://www.clamav.net/faq.html for an explanation.: 3
Time(s)
freshclam daemon 0.83 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686): 8
Time(s)
WARNING:
On Tue, 3 May 2005 01:39:42 +0800
"List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Logwatch reported outdated warning as follows:-
>
> **Unmatched Entries**
>SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES: 3 Time(s)
>Received signal 15, terminating: 7 Time(s)
>Received signal 14, wak
List wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-0.84]# freshclam --version
> ClamAV 0.84/863/Tue May 3 00:32:37 2005
ps -ax | grep freshclam
More than one?
Matt
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Hi,
Logwatch reported outdated warning as follows:-
**Unmatched Entries**
SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES: 3 Time(s)
Received signal 15, terminating: 7 Time(s)
Received signal 14, wake up: 333 Time(s)
WARNING: Local version: 0.83 Recommended version: 0.84: 24 Time(s)
List wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-0.84]# freshclam --version
ClamAV 0.84/863/Tue May 3 00:32:37 2005
ps -ax | grep freshclam
More than one?
No. One and the only.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-0.84]# ps aux | grep freshclam
clamav 23724 0.0 0.2 5068 1272 ?Ss 03:07 0:00
/usr/local/b
On Tue, 3 May 2005 03:10:00 +0800
"List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > List wrote:
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-0.84]# freshclam --version
> >> ClamAV 0.84/863/Tue May 3 00:32:37 2005
> >
> >
> > ps -ax | grep freshclam
> >
> > More than one?
>
> No. One and the only.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi All,
Is anyone else getting hit by this right now?
It seems to be picking it up on seemingly genuine
mail.
Can anyone confirm that this is not a detection error?
Thanks, Chris
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam pro
On Mon, 2 May 2005 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is anyone else getting hit by this right now?
>
> It seems to be picking it up on seemingly genuine
> mail.
>
> Can anyone confirm that this is not a detection error?
It's most likely a false positiv
You're right. Apologies.
Chris
--- Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2005 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
> Chris Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is anyone else getting hit by this right now?
> >
> > It seems to be picking it up on seemingly genuine
> > mail
I'm having lots of customers call up saying their clamd is segfaulting..
installations that have been around for many months (0.80) and all of a
sudden, later in the week last week.. everyone's been having problems with
clamd segfaulting. Updating to clamav 0.84 seems to have done the trick, bu
What's this teletype error about?
checking for curl >= 7.10.0... syntax error on line 1, teletype
7.13.2
Looking at config.log I see:
configure:11296: checking for curl >= 7.10.0
configure:11308: result: 7.13.2
And I notice "-lcurl" was used in the compile, so I'm thinking this
isn't so serious...
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:19:53PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>I'm having lots of customers call up saying their clamd is segfaulting..
>installations that have been around for many months (0.80) and all of a
>sudden, later in the week last week.. everyone's been having problems with
>clamd se
Pete Hicks wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:19:53PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
I'm having lots of customers call up saying their clamd is segfaulting..
installations that have been around for many months (0.80) and all of a
sudden, later in the week last week.. everyone's been having problems
Nigel Horne wrote:
I've captured a copy of an email that looks like it's causing clamav to
loop.
Thank you for the sample which I have looked at.
The email has several sizable zip files
attached to each of which contains a number of word documents.
Since each of the files MUST be individually s
Upgrading didn't seem to help me, though maybe it slowed down the
crash rate - I just had another crash about an hour ago. I'm getting
slammed at postmaster each time it crashes. This was in the logs from
the latest crash:
May 2 14:22:24 smtp clamav-milter[153]: ClamAv: setsockopt() failed
(Inv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Macdougall wrote:
|
|
| Pete Hicks wrote:
|
|> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:19:53PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
|>
|>> I'm having lots of customers call up saying their clamd is
|>> segfaulting.. installations that have been around for many
|>> mont
38 matches
Mail list logo
