On 02/27/2010 12:56 AM, Chris wrote:
> I'm a bit confused, sometimes that's not hard to do. I'm running the
> ClamAv plugin with SpamAssassin and one spam was marked with the above
> virus. When saving just the infected attachment and running
>
> [ch...@localhost Virus]$ clamdscan - fd[12]: OK
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to setup ClamAV with my Citadel server, but for some reason
>> it does not appear to start as far as netstat -anp says.
>>
>> I reconfigured using: dpkg-reconfigure clamav-base, so that TCP is
>> used. The process is started, but nothing is listening on port 3100.
>>
>> I'm u
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to setup ClamAV with my Citadel server, but for some reason
> it does not appear to start as far as netstat -anp says.
>
> I reconfigured using: dpkg-reconfigure clamav-base, so that TCP is
> used. The process is started, but nothing is listening on port 3100.
>
> I'm using a De
Steve Holdoway wrote:
IIRC supervise is a part of djb's software package to restart processes
if they fail. As such this will only come into play if freshclam falls
over.
So don't worry about it (:
Many thanks. Have a good weekend!
___
Help us build
I'm a bit confused, sometimes that's not hard to do. I'm running the
ClamAv plugin with SpamAssassin and one spam was marked with the above
virus. When saving just the infected attachment and running
[ch...@localhost Virus]$ clamdscan -
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
Hi,
I wanted to setup ClamAV with my Citadel server, but for some reason
it does not appear to start as far as netstat -anp says.
I reconfigured using: dpkg-reconfigure clamav-base, so that TCP is
used. The process is started, but nothing is listening on port 3100.
I'm using a Debian Etch distro
lists wrote:
The last time I checked the discussion was based upon scanning outbound
mail for Viruses at the gateway, but thank you for your self righteous
'net nanny' input Robert. However, your post does qualify as noise and
I'm ashamed of myself for responding to you. You really are *not* wort
IIRC supervise is a part of djb's software package to restart processes
if they fail. As such this will only come into play if freshclam falls
over.
So don't worry about it (:
Steve
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 15:35 -0500, Ian Evans wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> Just wondering if this is something I need to
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:30 -0600, Robert Wyatt wrote:
> It's truly amazing to me how much discussion can be had with
> absolutely no reference to ClamAV.
>
> It almost seems like we could write a white paper on spam, but of
> course that's so yesterday. It's much more stimulating to pretend lik
Hi there.
Just wondering if this is something I need to worry about.
I'm running freshclam as a daemon. Logs show it's updating virus
defintions just fine. However, I noticed this in ps aux yesterday:
readproctitle service errors: ...supervise: fatal: unable to start
freshclam/run: file does no
It's truly amazing to me how much discussion can be had with
absolutely no reference to ClamAV.
It almost seems like we could write a white paper on spam, but of
course that's so yesterday. It's much more stimulating to pretend like
this is the first time anyone ever thought of dealing with it
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:21:03 -0800
Dennis Peterson articulated:
> On 2/26/10 8:59 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:50 +1300
> > Steve Holdoway articulated:
> >
> >> You what? In the last case I had a problem, it was a networked pc
> >> infected with a trojan spewing spam out. Just
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Jerry wrote:
Lets take this from the top.
[ ... ]
The morgue is getting full of flogged-to-death horses and slain strawman
arguments. Please stop.
Butbutbut... It's still horse-shaped! And I think I saw that bale of
straw move!
-kgd, tr
On 2/26/10 8:59 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:50 +1300
Steve Holdoway articulated:
You what? In the last case I had a problem, it was a networked pc
infected with a trojan spewing spam out. Just *how* does SMTP Auth
stop this?
Your lack of knowledge is matched only by your inabil
Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:40:13 -0500
> Bowie Bailey articulated:
>
>
>> Abide by what edict? Email marked as containing a virus is simply
>> rejected. If a spammer or bot wishes to send out viruses from my
>> network, they'll have to bypass my MTA to do it, which is more
>> diffi
--On 25 February 2010 22:15:49 -0500 Jerry wrote:
Abide by what edict? Email marked as containing a virus is simply
rejected. If a spammer or bot wishes to send out viruses from my
network, they'll have to bypass my MTA to do it, which is more
difficult since very few machines on my netwo
--On 24 February 2010 08:52:39 -0600 Steven Stern
wrote:
Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
If I were mailing malware, I'd be sure to mark that it had been scanned,
approved, and was safe to open.
That has no bearing on whether it's useful for me to scan mail emitted from
> > Steven Stern wrote:
> > > Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:09 -0500
> Kris Deugau articulated:
> > So you can reduce malware propagation? (And as a result, maybe not
> > end up on everyone's local blacklist for spewing garbage...)
On 24.02.10 11:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:59 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:50 +1300
> Steve Holdoway articulated:
>
> > You what? In the last case I had a problem, it was a networked pc
> > infected with a trojan spewing spam out. Just *how* does SMTP Auth
> > stop this?
> >
> > Your lack of kn
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:51:15 -0500
Kris Deugau articulated:
> Even as a small boutique ISP (~1200-1300 dialup customers) before
> being swallowed by a larger company, when we introduced outbound
> virus scanning in ~2001 we regularly found virus mail originating
> from customer systems. Customer
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:50 +1300
Steve Holdoway articulated:
> You what? In the last case I had a problem, it was a networked pc
> infected with a trojan spewing spam out. Just *how* does SMTP Auth
> stop this?
>
> Your lack of knowledge is matched only by your inability to spell ( no
> irrega
21 matches
Mail list logo
