Nathan Gibbs wrote:
I am not aware of the team issuing a new major version number that they
then break in a few months with a new major version update.
0.95.x was the latest version less than a year ago. To me, it seems a little
soon to EOL it.
At some point the end user has to
Il 01/03/2011 08:59, Simon Hobson ha scritto:
I too am grateful to the ClamAV team - but I also sometimes think
their attitude to users lacks sensitivity at times.
I agree. Upgrading may depends on a lot of steps, which may be not easy
to repeat sometimes, and which may be delayed to
* Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
Hi,
just an idea for those insisting on running old versions: After some
simple tests I believe it's possible to get your own database check
even on versions older than 0.96.x (4?). Have freshclam update the
signatures into a testing directory, not the real
On 02/28/2011 09:29 AM, Nathan Gibbs wrote:
* Török Edwin wrote:
but apparently people running 0.95 care more about clamd working than
actually detecting malware.
0.95 working equals more protection than 0.95 not working.
I will concede that its not the best solution, but its better than
