Re: [clamav-users] Minor bug or working as intended?

2022-03-01 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi Micah, On Tue, 1 Mar 2022, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users wrote: ... Perhaps we should be asking the development team for readable LDB rules? :) Creating a new "human readable", or "human friendly", signature language is something that I've brought up many times this past 6 month

Re: [clamav-users] allowlist/fixing false positive

2022-03-01 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Tue, 1 Mar 2022, Alex via clamav-users wrote: I have a fedora34 system with clamd-0.103.5 and amavisd/SA/postfix. I have a newsletter from ncua.gov that keeps getting blocked because it The providers of Fedora do some IMHO slightly odd things with ClamAV packaging which sometimes

Re: [clamav-users] allowlist/fixing false positive

2022-03-01 Thread Kris Deugau
Alex via clamav-users wrote: Hi, I have a fedora34 system with clamd-0.103.5 and amavisd/SA/postfix. I have a newsletter from ncua.gov that keeps getting blocked because it apparently contains links.gd in the body somewhere, although I can't find it. How do I exclude this email from being tagge

[clamav-users] allowlist/fixing false positive

2022-03-01 Thread Alex via clamav-users
Hi, I have a fedora34 system with clamd-0.103.5 and amavisd/SA/postfix. I have a newsletter from ncua.gov that keeps getting blocked because it apparently contains links.gd in the body somewhere, although I can't find it. How do I exclude this email from being tagged without having to bypass the

Re: [clamav-users] Minor bug or working as intended?

2022-03-01 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users
> Execution time will be important for scanning filesystems, less so for > scanning mail (at least for scanning low-volume mail) and readability > can be hugely important if you're writing a lot of rules. Perhaps we > should be asking the development team for readable LDB rules? :) Creating a new