My server is running Solaris 10, Sendmail 8.13.8, I upgraded clamav from
0.88.7 to 0.90.2.
(Blastwave build). I first got a bunch of errors of the form :
ERROR: Parse error at line 228: Option ScanArchive requires boolean
argument.
/opt/csw/sbin/clamav-milter: Can't parse the config file
On 11/25/05, Richard Pijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, So if i understand you correctly, Sober.Y == Sober.U ?
Viruses mutate frequently, and different vendors give different names to
viruses as they get ahold of samples. And, there's no strict line between
versions; one program might
Mine's doing the same. Solaris 9, clamav 0.87, blastwave build. I took a
look with truss and it seems to be looping doing this over and over and over
(I don't se any values changing here):
/2: open(/opt/csw/share/clamav, O_RDONLY|O_NDELAY|O_LARGEFILE) = 7
/2: fstat64(7, 0xFEEFBD00) = 0
/2:
Thanks all, for the fast responses! I had indeed set ReadTimeout to 0 at
some point in the dim past. I have changed it to a positive number and
clamav-milter seems MUCH happier.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Just wondering if anyone knew whether Worm.Mytob.CL is the same as the
worm the media is calling Zotob(zotob.a or zotob.b) ? Circumstantial
evidence points that way but I don't have any samples to play with.
I've searched the usual sites with nothing conclusive either way...
thanks Betsy
On 6/15/05, ladha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my sendmail.mc
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clmilter', `S-local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=,
T=S:4m;R:4m')
dnl
I see two typos. try
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clmilter', `S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock,
F=T,T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl
Make sure you don't have extra
Last Tuesday I updated from Clamav 0.83 to Clamav 0.85.1 (Blastwave
package). My server runs Solaris 9 and sendmail 8.13.3 (also
blastwave). Clamav-milter runs with these flags:
# cat /opt/csw/etc/clamav-milter
-q -lo /opt/csw/run/clmilter.sock
On 6/14/05, Damian Menscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is it's not documented in TFM, it's documented in the FAQ:
http://wiki.clamav.net/index.php/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Thanks, actually I missed that because I searched on the *whole* error string.
I've switched back to
On 6/2/05, Matt Fretwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Broken is broken :) It is pretty irrelevant, if they are broken, whether
you block them or not, one might suggest.
It's still worth blocking them, because otherwise they trigger virus
alerts on the end-user's machines running local virus
I am getting the same thing.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:52:55 -0500, David Blank-Edelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just wanted to pop in and provide the latest update on our saga
(clamd 0.83 just stops playing nice after running for a while) with
some more interesting information like stack traces.
This sounds like exactly
I'd like to see one list, for similar reasons. I run Solaris but I can
see that a lot of folks here run Linux, and if they were on a separate
list probably all their general QA's would end up on that list, and
I'd end up reading it anyway. And if most of the users migrated over
there, it would be
12 matches
Mail list logo
