On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
> There are a number of package maintainers for ClamAV on Solaris. The
> installation method differs for each.
>
> I tried to figure out what this was saying a couple of times.
> I've decided that it's trying to say that there are a coup
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:54 PM, John Zimmerman wrote:
> Yeah. I'm not sure I mind it being split, but there seems to be
> inconsistencies, missing config files, wrong username, bad or no systemd
> files etc
>
> Working off of this right now:
> http://linux-audit.com/install-clamav-on-centos
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Walter H. wrote:
> that sounds quite surprising to me; as I did this with the EPEL repository
> but with CentOS 6
> and had no problems;
Even though it's the same guy packaging ClamAV for both CentOS 6 & 7
he's gone crazy splitting it for 7 and it's not a good ex
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> http://sanesecurity.co.uk/foxhole-databases/
>
> Unfortunatly, nothing seems to be linked, the only thing I can save is
> the web page itself with either iceweasel or chromium. And I did enable
> cookies, in chromium, to no avail.
That's ju
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:54 AM, nikos wrote:
> ERROR: This tool requires libclamav with functionality level 79 or
> higher (current f-level: 77)
Maybe you have multiple libclamav's on your system and it links with
the old one?
___
Help us build a comp
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> I can install Solaris on this sparc64 machine as early as next week.
OpenCSW provides a complete Solaris build farm if you're interested,
we used to host automatic builds for ClamAV before Sourcefire aquired
it.
http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Wietse Jorissen
wrote:
> -rw-r--r--. 1 clam clam 0 jun 2 03:50 clamd.log
> -rw-r--r--. 1 clamav clamav 59314 mei 12 03:13 clamd.log-20130512
> -rw-r--r--. 1 clamav clamav 59926 mei 19 04:41 clamd.log-20130519
> -rw-r--r--. 1 clamav clamav 40383 mei 24 16:43
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Denis McMahon wrote:
> So the issue is that apparmor is blocking freshclam?
>
> After adding:
>
> /etc/resolv.conf r,
> /etc/network/nameservers r,
>
> in:
>
> /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.freshclam
>
> freshclam updated fine!
I asked you a few days ago "SELi
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:55 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 8:52 AM, Denis McMahon wrote:
>
>> On 22/06/13 04:10, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> On 6/21/13 5:45 AM, Denis McMahon wrote:
>>
appear to suggest that my dns is fine (these are included in the log). I
have another machi
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Paul Whelan wrote:
>
> On 9 Apr 2013 at 11:12, Steve Basford wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Couple of updates..
>>
>> I've just check end the Sanesecurity.TestSig.GTUBE signature name had
>> accidentally been renamed to Sanesecurity.TestSig.10616
>>
>> I have, however,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Robert Lopez wrote:
> Bot net member identification and blocking.
> Block email from spoofed in-our-domain-sender sent from outside our domain
> when it is equal to one of list of recipients.
Why do you want this in ClamAV when other tools like RBLs and
SpamAssass
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Tilman Schmidt
wrote:
> Am 14.02.2013 14:17, schrieb Daniel McDonald:
>> But for the majority of us, It's not just potentially unwanted, it is simply
>> unwanted. If I had wanted an open phone, I would have bought an Android.
>
> That does of course heavily depend
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Joseph, Matthew (EXP)
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know if ClamAV supports the UFS File system?
As far as I know it doesn't operate on that level so if it runs on a
certain OS it "supports" any file system that OS supports, if you can
mount it ClamAV can scan
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Fredrich Maney wrote:
> Is there a better way to do this that I'm overlooking?
Using clamDscan?
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:47 PM, David Raynor wrote:
> This error message is because of a gcc bug, specific to gcc version 4.6 on
> Solaris 10 (gcc bug 49347). That is fixed in gcc 4.7.
I can build with llvm enabled on Solaris 10 i386 with gcc 4.7.1 but on
sparc it says:
checking for supported O
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 4:05 PM, Peter Bonivart wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
>>> Dear ClamAV users,
>>>
>>> ClamAV 0.97.6 includes minor bug fixes and detection improvements.
&g
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
> Dear ClamAV users,
>
> ClamAV 0.97.6 includes minor bug fixes and detection improvements.
Wasn't bug 5252 important enough to warrant a minor release? Lots of
us had to run patched versions and looking at the change log you fixed
a bunch of stu
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>> There you go making life difficult for yourself again. Why not set up
>> your own ClamAV database mirror?
>
> I'm not sure how to do this; however, we have only about 4 or 5 machines
> that poll for virus updates. And the mirror would b
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Reynolds, David C.
wrote:
> I've recently installed .97.3 on an SGI Origin 3000 running TRIX v6.5.28
> using gcc 3.2.1. (I did need to make some source file modifications). I was
> able to run clamscan against a directory seemingly without error.
>
> However, I
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Shobana Narayanaswamy
wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I want to run ClamAV on a FreeBSD based appliance. However, it appears to
> have a performance impact that is significant (cpu/mem).
> Is there a lightweight version? Or can I possibly limit the virus
> definitions to only Fr
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch
wrote:
> That's the whole problem as both are legal and correct (as in
> RFC-compliant) form.
> And you want to flag it as "spam"?
Regardless of form I would call it spam since I've never seen legit
numeric links. I've had my own SA rule for the
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Luca Gibelli wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear ClamAV users,
>>
>>
>> This is a bugfix release recommended for all users. Please refer to the
>> ChangeLog file for details.
>>
>> Download : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/clam
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:26 AM, David Alix wrote:
> I'm running clamav 0.97/12943 on Solaris 9. Twice today, clamd has abended.
> I can find no error message in the log files indicating the problem. Is
> anyone else seeing this, or have any suggestions on how to troubleshoot
> this?
You could
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Martin Preen
wrote:
> Sorry, but currently I can't use these package on that
> system (because of the library/package/path dependencies).
Not sure what you mean here? Everything from OpenCSW installs
separately from the rest of Solaris and doesn't affect it all, y
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:03 PM, aCaB wrote:
> On 03/10/11 20:58, Peter Bonivart wrote:
>> You could give our ClamAV package a try:
>>
>> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWclamav/
>
> Guys,
> Anybody tried?
>
> I'd be very interested in hearing th
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Martin Preen
wrote:
> Platform information
>
> uname: solaris2.10
> OS: solaris2.10, ARCH: sparc, CPU: sparc
> Full OS version: Solaris 10 1/06 s10s_u1wos_19a SPARC
> zlib version: 1.1.4 (1.1.4)
> platform id: 0x0e663c3c1
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Though there is no free VM tool for Mac - Fusion is dirt cheap.
VirtualBox is free and runs on Mac, it can even host Mac vm's.
/peter
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http:/
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Armitage, Jon wrote:
> Edwin, I hope this makes sense to you, I'm a sysadmin, not a programmer, so
> I'm not sure what the differences mean.
If you want to avoid the hassle you can use pre-built binary packages
from OpenCSW. We have ClamAV in our repository includ
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> You can help by testing (or just running ./configure && make check) the
> latest code available in our Git repository - the latest snapshot
> tarball can be grabbed here:
>
> http://git.clamav.net/gitweb?p=clamav-devel.git;a=snapshot;h=refs/hea
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Luca Gibelli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> starting from the 0.96.2 release, our source tarball includes a script to
> automatically restart clamd in case the daemon crashes.
In Solaris, we use SMF (Service Management Facility). It keeps state
of services regardless of patc
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Tom Goerger wrote:
> I'm having problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9 and 10. I believe I've
> copied in the appropriate sections of configure and make below. Can anyone
> tell me why this might be failing? Or, what other information I can provide
> that might he
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:32 PM, JD wrote:
> All in all, these packages are just not ready for the non-techie user!!
So complain to the packager then.
--
/peter
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.cla
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
wrote:
> IMHO, open source projects don't have a business side.
>
> Opensource projects exist for the developers to get the software they need,
> faster, through colaboration with others. If anyone else finds it usefull
> that's an added bo
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jeroen Ticheler
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> Although I don't agree with aggressive emails, I do myself have serious
> problems that started on exactly the 15th. Since then my mail server has
> become completely unreliable and an upgrade to 0.95.3 has not resolved my
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Giampaolo Tomassoni
wrote:
> Forcefully unsubscribing people is not a fair way to silence them. Not even
> explaining why is even worse.
...on the other hand the description of this mailing list is
"obtaining support for UNIX platforms". In my mind you have no
in
d the workstations update from the slave servers, also running
Apache of course.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
OS message.
This doesn't sound like a Clam problem to me.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
son P900 mobile phone.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
Peter Bonivart wrote:
Grow up. I gave pertinent, and truthful, advice to the question,
that is
all.
To quote your earlier post:
"There's plenty of happy Postfix users running MailScanner, the Postfix
author doesn't like the way MailScanner interacts with
by many happy users, if
you call that all the fancy things above it's your choice. You have a
very short fuse Matt.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
g to
rewrite the whole file.
The ruleset feature in MailScanner is very powerful and might save you
from using procmail.
Almost every user of MailScanner also uses Clam so you will find your
setup well supported.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
__
up to date (version: 27, sigs: 23982, f-level: 2, builder:
tomek)
TTL: 900
daily.cvd version from DNS: 585
Connecting via proxy.xxx.xx
daily.cvd is up to date (version: 585, sigs: 2485, f-level: 3, builder:
trog)
Freeing option list...done
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it
et:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately !
Check for multiple installations at different locations. Did 0.80
install in a different place than 0.70?
By the way, it's version 0.70 and 0.80, not 7.0 and 8.0.
--
/Peter Bonivart
Jonathan Pitcher wrote:
Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an e-mail
blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] had a virus sent to
them?
http://www.mailscanner.info
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
there.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the
signature for those viruses before anyone else there
was no name for them. They called Netsky Somefool and MyDoom SCO. When
the commercials got a signature out they made up those more known names.
Please check the archives before posting. This has been on the list a
million times.
--
/Peter
This really has nothing to do with Clam since it seems to work for you.
You need to bump up your Unix skills a couple of notches. There's plenty
of online material that help with this kind of stuff.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save
clamav-0.75.1-1mdk
# rpm -ql clamav-0.75.1-1mdk | grep freshclam
/usr/bin/freshclam
Note that you might have several different Clam packages and they may be
named differently on your system, mine is Mandrake.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
-
think.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.32.5,
SpamAssassin 2.64 + DCC 1.2.50, ClamAV 0.75.1 + GMP 4.1.2, Vispan 1.4
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest pri
protections. Maybe that's why
you "must" have the updates immediately with no regard to server load or
maybe I missed the solution that took care of that one too in the flood
of mail. Premium servers for a fee is the best solution I have seen so far.
No offence meant to anyone in pa
named in such a
generic way most people think it affects all components of Clam AV. It
would be better if it was called clamd.conf, less confusion that way I
think.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.32.5,
SpamAssassin 2.
your old one.
By the way, clamav.conf is only used by clamd which you're not using
with MS. Concentrate on freshclam.conf instead.
Should be a simple five minute upgrade. Post on the MS list if you need
more help.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9,
current *stable* release, I think he meant that you should try
the current snapshot. Go here and download the latest one:
http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.31.6,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.
u set ABI to 32 so you didn't compile in 64 bit mode, if so Clam
can't find it. It's mentioned in the docs.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.45, ClamAV 0.70 + G
e exact. However, I am using the libz and libbz2 libraries from blastwave.org. I doubt that will matter, since I have used Sun's libraries in the past. I build the clamav pkg for that group, so you are welcome to give that a try.
I have also compiled it with Solaris 9. I used gcc though.
--
/
instructions in
.../clamav-milter/INSTALL
But if he's using MailScanner he should join that list if clamscan works
from the command line.
www.mailscanner.info
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63
use any virus scanner in daemon mode so you don't
have to start anything. Check your mail log to see what's going on when
you send those test messages.
Thank you very much for any help that you guys can give me. I'm going crazy
trying to properly configure this!!
It's easier if
ed the RPM installation you control everything with "service
MailScanner ...".
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.45, ClamAV 0.70 + GMP 4.1.2, Vispan 1.4
---
ll be
disabled !
Thoughts/Comments?
Did you compile GMP as 32 bit? Otherwise it will not match Clam (if you
can't compile that in 64 bit mode). Set ABI=32 when you configure GMP.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
Sp
Jim Maul wrote:
There is something that is causing clamav to not be able to detect this
virus after the message has been bounced and now forwarded.
Damaged bounces are not dangerous. Why bother making signatures for them
when you don't make money showing how many viruses you detect?
--
/
lease...
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.39, ClamAV 0.70 + GMP 4.1.2, Vispan 1.3
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monke
disable GMP support at configure time so it doesn't matter if
you add it later.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.39, ClamAV 0.70 + GMP 4.1.2, Vispa
ality needed for development in gmp-devel, they do
this for all packages. If you compile it yourself it does not apply. He
who mislead you on this issue assumed you were on Red Hat Linux.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4
system and point your
internal systems there.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.39, ClamAV 0.70 + GMP 4.1.2, Vispan 1.3
---
This SF.Net
personal use but I
guess that will not work for you.
Look here for work going on to broaden the reach of Clam:
http://www.clamav.net/3rdparty.html#pagestart
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1
Bora wrote:
Peter, I know that mailscanner has documentation for everything except with
qmail, do know where I can find it?
I think these are the guys who added support for qmail to MailScanner,
they package the whole thing also:
http://opencomputing.sourceforge.net/
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix
t the client part of clamd.
http://www.clamav.net/doc/0.70/html/node14.html
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.39, ClamAV 0.70 + GMP 4.1.2, Vispa
sy to find from here (link on Clams web site):
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.virusdb
You can sign up on that mailing list also to be updated.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I see a description of this virus?
http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32netskyy.html
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.39, ClamAV 0.70 + GMP 4.1.2
use rulesets if you want it to handle each
domain different in any way. Almost every option in MailScanner can have
rulesets, it's very powerful.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1
the topic?
Put a box in front of it running MailScanner. You can let it filter
virus and spam for free before sending it to Exchange. It's very
flexible and powerful but still easy to install. Great support on their
list too.
http://www.mailscanner.info
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers d
ts to integrate with the mail server..
http://www.mailscanner.info
Works great!
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.39, ClamAV 0.70RC + GMP 4.1.2, Vispa
people you
will see that they differ in format which makes it hard to parse. That
problem is being addressed now.
All it would take are a few users who keep an eye on the database and
enter additional information if they have it.
That's the plan.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it i
ere.
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.virusdb
There's also work being done on a web site with just the info you're
requesting.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63
figures out the dependencies.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.39, ClamAV 0.70RC + GMP 4.1.2, MailStats 0.25
---
This SF.Net email is sp
aven't heard of any news for some time.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, ClamAV 0.67 + GMP 4.1.2, MailStats 0.25
---
This SF.Net e
lease don't ask Clam to do
their work. What's next, it's going to be a firewall and an intrusion
detection system all in one?
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, Clam
Craig Daters wrote:
Okay, I discovered that all of the logging is being done in
/var/log/maillog as opposed to /var/log/messages, and once I pointed
grep to the right file, then all has become well in the universe.
I wouldn't have dared posting about that. ;-)
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix l
sy to find.
Thanks!
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, ClamAV 0.67 + GMP 4.1.2, MailStats 0.25
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by
lness. So much for the
usefulness of attachments too. Thanks a lot spammers and virus
writers. The good news is we'll have to replace SMTP with a better,
more robust, and more secure system.
I'm sure Microsoft is ready to provide us with something new. ;-)
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix love
David Gregg wrote:
Does anybody know how/where to obtain a listing of all viruses that ClamAV
'knows' about?
sigtool -l
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, ClamAV 0.67 +
igurable. There are ports for FreeBSD
as well. I recommend plugging in SpamAssassin also.
http://www.mailscanner.info
It's actually much easier than what you're doing now and it scales with
your needs.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Send
tation fault'
My question - what is wrong
If you run "ldd /usr/local/freshclam" you will see that a couple of
needed libs are missing, like libclam and libgmp. They are located in
/usr/local/lib, you need to include /usr/local/lib in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Uni
Chris A wrote:
Is there a way to display a list of virii that the current pattern files
protect against?
sigtool --list-sigs
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, ClamAV 0.67 + GMP 4.1.2
rences between Clams
naming and the commercials. That's all that is needed really, since
several of them have nice info regarding every virus. I guess they will
post here when they have something to share about the web site.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, So
FreshClam wrote:
Do you know where I can find RH 7.3 package of GNU MP 3? Thanks!
ftp://speakeasy.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/7.3/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/gmp-4.0.1-3.i386.rpm
ftp://speakeasy.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/7.2/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/gmp-3.1.1-4.i386.rpm
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do
d
it works just fine.
Here are the official packages for Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/mailscanner.html
The web site for MailScanner is:
http://www.mailscanner.info
If you have specific MailScanner questions you can sign up on that list.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do
Amos wrote:
I got the 64-bit CFLAGS settings from when compiled gmp, and they worked
for 0.65.
Try compiling GMP in 32-bit mode (mentioned in Clam docs) and you should
be OK.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14
onitor it.
I still can't see the benefit of running it as a daemon.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, ClamAV 0.67 + GMP 4.1.2
own to stop and why
implement another system to keep it running when you can run it from
crontab? Just don't run it at 0 minutes like everyone else. ;-)
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC
l time.
Where did you get that from?
But it does seem strange that Jason is afraid of the daemon stopping and
want to monitor that, why not just run it from crontab? What's the
benefit of running the daemon?
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendma
hough that
it was forced out early due to security concerns so it had some new code
disabled (OLE2 and Dazuko).
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, ClamAV 0.66 + GMP
Mário Luis Ghoneim wrote:
What does it means?
It means it can't check the digital signatures. It downloads the updates
anyway but you can't be sure they have not been compromised.
How can I to solve it?
Download GMP here: http://www.swox.com/gmp
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it
rce-code (or Makefile)
to be solaris-id compatible wouldn't hurt either :)
...the developers listened and are going to change it to a truly
portable solution using sed.
Thank you devs and thank you too, Fajar, for providing Solaris packages.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my clamd is in /usr/local/sbin/, but I will try to install first then
change the path.
Thanks.
Did you just send us a 700+ line mail to add those lines? Have you heard
of trimming the original?
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9
dit them to /usr/xpg4/bin/id I can run
make install with no errors.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, ClamAV 0.66 + GMP 4.1.2
---
SF.Ne
But could you on Solaris use /usr/xpg4/bin/id instead? That one supports -u.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.30, ClamAV 0.66 + GMP
about a simple roadmap on the web site for future versions of Clam,
main features you want in every release and an estimated release time?
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV
etter that than posting on this list.
--
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCo
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
