does recognize the file, but not
any other AV.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFFrYsZVf373DysOTURAtx/AKCj0w5IQWRom24D9jrsqO7w6IWMIACcCSS7
Y87QhZ8LtiuzukF/E58K+qI=
=JiOR
-END PGP SIGNATURE
ers do set the List-Id header, but not the Precedence
- -header. You might also want to make sure that you don't auto-reply to
messages from mailer-daemon@ or noreply@ etc. I accidently found it
responding to mailer-daemon messages once :-s
Kind regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SI
To start with, which tools do you have? What are the error-messages?
Can you ping/traceroute the update hosts? Telnet?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFFnYyKVf373DysOTURAneHAKCGoIU5tzl5C4kP0dsHLTw1rQhxbAC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerard Seibert wrote:
> On Saturday December 30, 2006 at 07:26:57 (PM) Sander Holthaus
> wrote:
>
>> The issue is that email never was designed to be used in that
>> particular fashion. While it may be fast and almost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
> Sander Holthaus wrote:
>
>>
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>>> This is a very naive or at least uninformed position to take on the
>>> monetary significance of email.
>
>> The issu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Dave Warren wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sander Holthaus wrote:
>>>
>>>> A tempfail is not a disas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
> Sander Holthaus wrote:
>
>> A tempfail is not a disaster in most scenarios. You may not be
>> able to receive mail until it is fixed, but you still get the
>> mail after it is fixed.
>
> I thi
z file, due to an odd firewall bug, which meant that my
> ftp host only received a 0 byte file :(
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
I've seen the same on MSRBL-Images. Seems to be broken lately. I
always run (well, the script does) clamscan -d var/tmp/<>
before installing them, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Sander Holthaus wrote:
>
>
>> A malformed database points to:
>>
>> - - serious system malfunction - - security breach - - security
>> breach / system malfun
ich could be
a side effect of a corrupted database).
Kind regards,
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFFln4ZVf373DysOTURAv1rAKCO+b6wNu28RYtWCd5YFewQ7Bq39QCeL8Yf
+zeke1muMaNN/LX6q4pF8yc=
=a2g8
-END
se an external package for handling MIME and optionally archive
formats.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFFi8DSVf373DysOTURAlR3AJwMH5zaKTWy9/VTNjQ8h2KpbKyYRgCgjmDg
Z+DOiN+D9zaVr8AW6gW1Ofk=
=U
ss that your best bet is going for a scanner (actually,
scanners I you want to do a thorough job) that has Windows as its
native platform (ClamAV is designed for *nix) and doing it from a
Windows environment (which would allow you to use the MAPI-interface
to scan inside the pst's). But it rea
omething on their side should
have closed them, blacklisted you or whatever. Seems something on the
side of evro.net is seriously malconfigured.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEM+9QVf373Dy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karolis Dautartas wrote:
>> Which version?
> It was 0.87. After reading your email I upgraded to 0.88.1
Good. Which OS are you on?
>
>> What does your freshclam log say?
> It had been disabled in the config files. I have enabled it now.
> Aparently th
anks, Karolis
>
Which version?
What does your freshclam log say? Tried verbose option?
Why run Freshclam from cron instead of the freshclam daemon?
In which state are those frozen processes, e.g. what are doing?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4
uation where it may happen. In those
cases, I want ClamAV to drop the db, but reload with good db's.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD4DBQFEKoQcVf373DysOTURAoEFAJdFF//gPbo3F5AsgJLQ7319PZfjAKCRKPcJ
G3jeSkZTJ/NJ+lz7LOOmFA==
=e4cX
--
Was is the official stance of the ClamAV team on this? Any chance of
unofficial sigs getting included in the official sigs after review?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEGHvsVf373DysOTURAuVbAJwMJAFgpf1Y1nyy1xU4pvBnM
Sober.Y variants, but
clamdscan does (actually, I have one email where is doesn't find it either
:-( )?
I also notice that clamscan can scan and detect some Phising mails very
fast, while clamdscan seems to hang on them (for about 30 seconds). Is that
related?
Kind regards,
Sander Holthaus
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
18 matches
Mail list logo
