Preferred Properties
Chicago and Illinois NorthShore Real Estate Experts
On Sat, 15 May 2004 18:26 , Steven P. Donegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
This was a first for me - ClamAV has been - well about as perfect as any
software could be - today one sneaked by that Norton/Symantec caught.
Anyone
Eric Becker wrote:
Well - in this case it was definitely from outside - and the proxy I
wrote and use passes all email, internal or external, through clam and
?spam assassin and a bunch of custom rules... but thanks :-)
Well depending on the virus, it may be sending emails from it's own smtp
This was a first for me - ClamAV has been - well about as perfect as any
software could be - today one sneaked by that Norton/Symantec caught.
Anyone else seen this - I prefer my first line of defense (ClamAV on the
server) catches everything andf the desktop stuff gets bored
Hmmm, funny - since I received this error as postmaster the sourceforge
verification engine seems to have a bug :-)
Perhaps this will make it through - original question is about a virus
that appears to get through Clam AV and if my setup is correct or not.
---BeginMessage---
The original
Another attempt
---BeginMessage---
The original message was received at Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:36:07 -0800
from [1.0.24.3]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 550-Postmaster verification failed while checking [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
jamie wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Todd Lyons wrote:
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 08:36, Claudio Alonso wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I installed clamav-0.70rc-1 from rpm on my RedHat 9.0 (kernel 2.4.20-30.9) and started
clamd just to test it's current stability
The computer was on all night and today I
Lucas Albers wrote:
This is a hack, but I run monit on my servers to restart failed services.
Works well, it's a hack but it sure jacks my perceived uptime.
Tomasz Kojm said:
And that was it. There hasnt been another entry since and freshclam
quit after it. I supposed it is acceptable that
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Hmmm, I just do a freshclam from chron rather than let it run as a
daemon - as a new user (I just downloaded, installed, integrated with
my anti-spam/anti-virus proxy - home built, today). Is doing this in
any way a negative thing?
Not if you
Chris Meadors wrote:
Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Hmmm, I just do a freshclam from chron rather than let it run as a
daemon - as a new user (I just downloaded, installed, integrated with
my anti-spam/anti-virus proxy - home built, today). Is doing this in
any way a negative thing?
I don't think
