Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Why don't people think about the KISS principle?
freshclam can run in foreground, just like clamd and daemontools were
written by DJB, no?
I run clamd via daemontools, and I believe freshclam can also be run
same way, so no re-invention of wheels.
uh, because daem
hi clamav-users;
i've been using clamav for a long time now, and love it
dearly. however, once in a great while i get burned by
outdated definitions. at one point it was just me not
paying attention to the freshclam logfiles (i needed to
upgrade) but
J. Frost wrote:
Hy Henry,
...
infections, many of which are not detected by our Symantec
NAV Corporate edition (with up to the minute definitions).
i keep submitting files to Symantec, and they keep sending
me back responses that, yes, my file is infected, and with
the latest definitions i'll catch
greetings all;
i'm having a lot of grief with some very persistent worm
infections, many of which are not detected by our Symantec
NAV Corporate edition (with up to the minute definitions).
i keep submitting files to Symantec, and they keep sending
me
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:37:36 -0500
Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Speaking of CVS versions - any idea when the next release of clam will
be forthcoming? There are quite a few "latest CVS needed" signatures
now.
>
0.80-rc should be available at the beginning of Augu
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 at 14:31:03 -0400, henry j. mason wrote:
---snip---
has anyone else encountered this? i can easily see a poorly
written virus sending out botched copies of itself.
That's right. We got many samples of messages generated by
Worm.Bagle
greetings clamav.users;
i use clamav 0.70-4 on debian 3.0 stable/testing, with
amavisd-new-20030616. one of my customers has been complaining
of recieving what they claim are Worm.Bagle.AG emails, but
when they forward them to me, they contain nothing but an
