hi!
is there some known memory hog in version 0.72? My clamd suddenly
consumed all my free memory (about 200mb, when normally it peaks around 13mb).
I upgraded to 0.73, and i'm in the same situation. I'm using FC1. I couldn't figure what's
triggering this effect from the log, these are some li
nt: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Clamav-users] [Fwd: memory hog in 0.72 and 0.73]
hi!
is there some known memory hog in version 0.72? My clamd suddenly
consumed all my free memory (about 200mb, when normally it peaks around 13mb).
I upgraded to 0.73, and i&
Jeffrey Kroll wrote:
I have yet to see this problem in our instance of Clamd running w/ tcpserver &
spamassassin. Our current machine has been operating for a little over 3 months uptime w/
1 GB ram and 65,000 msg's / day.
if you're running for 3 months, you have a different version. I'm usin
i found the offending email. It's a 134mb email. It contains a 100mb
file. If i scan the file alone, memory consumption reaches 13mb. If i
scan the raw email, the memory consumption reaches 360mb. Any
suggestions besides disabling 'ScanMail'?
regards,
René
--
René Bellora wrote:
i found the offending email. It's a 134mb email. It contains a 100mb
file. If i scan the file alone, memory consumption reaches 13mb. If i
scan the raw email, the memory consumption reaches 360mb. Any
suggestions besides disabling 'ScanMail'?
regards,
René
134MB email seems
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 at 17:40:19 -0300, René Bellora wrote:
> i found the offending email. It's a 134mb email. It contains a 100mb
> file. If i scan the file alone, memory consumption reaches 13mb. If i
> scan the raw email, the memory consumption reaches 360mb. Any
I don't consider a 134 mb ema
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:03:18AM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 at 17:40:19 -0300, René Bellora wrote:
> > i found the offending email. It's a 134mb email. It contains a 100mb
> > file. If i scan the file alone, memory consumption reaches 13mb. If i
> > scan the raw email, t
