RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter thru a firewall

Perfect suggestion. And it works too!!! Thanks, Edy > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Nigel Horne > Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2005 11:07 PM > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-m

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter 0.81 on Mandrake

On Friday 28 Jan 2005 14:18, David Meuleman wrote: > Probably the best fix is to have clamav-milter also check for the > TemporaryDirectory directive in clamd.conf or to add a command-line > option to give it that value. If that's not an option, at least this > message will hopefully be found

[Clamav-users] CLAMAV-MILTER: doesn't agree with sendmail.cf

Hi All, I went through some posts about this problem but I don't think they could help me... I've installed clamav and clamav-milter on a fedora core 1 box using the rpm (ver0.81-3). Can anyone guide me on how to solve this issue please? a little infos about my system: - fedora core 1 - sendmail

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter .082 reject=451

On Monday 07 February 2005 13:59, Jamie Wilch wrote: > I just upgraded from .081b to .082. After the upgrade I started > receiving the following in my logs: > > Feb 7 11:41:05 mail sendmail[22494]: j17Idpkg022494: Milter: data, > reject=451 4.7.1 Please try again later > Feb 7 11:41:05 mail send

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter .082 reject=451

> On Monday 07 February 2005 13:59, Jamie Wilch wrote: > > I just upgraded from .081b to .082. After the upgrade I started > > receiving the following in my logs: > > > > Feb 7 11:41:05 mail sendmail[22494]: j17Idpkg022494: Milter: data, > > reject=451 4.7.1 Please try again later > > Feb 7 11:

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter .082 reject=451

Brett Simpson wrote: Did you use --enable-milter? I forgot to do that once and it caused similar problems. I am installing from an rpm package from the crash-hat repo. According the specs on the repo site, it is compiled with --enable-milter. If no one else is having troubles with this parti

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter .082 reject=451

Christopher X. Candreva wrote: On Monday 07 February 2005 13:59, Jamie Wilch wrote: I just upgraded from .081b to .082. After the upgrade I started receiving the following in my logs: Feb 7 11:41:05 mail sendmail[22494]: j17Idpkg022494: Milter: data, reject=451 4.7.1 Please try again later Feb

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter .082 reject=451

On Monday 07 Feb 2005 20:17, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > I was useing --external mode when I saw this. Turning that off seems to > have fixed things. It looks to me as though the SESSION command if clamd still has some problems. You can disable its use from clamav-milter by undefining SESSI

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter 0.83 on AIX 5.2

For any of you who may have been struggling to get the 0.83 version (actually, any version beyond 0.73 that I tried had trouble) of clamav-milter to run on AIX 5.2 while using a quarantine dir, the appended patch may be useful. You have to define BROKEN_MKDIR after applying this patch when you com

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav milter: loading new database

Update to at least 0.83b. -Nigel On Friday 11 Mar 2005 07:23, christian laubscher wrote: > i am running .83, clamav-milter w/o clamd, freshclam on slack 9.1. > low load, but persistent flow of incoming messages ( a few hundred mails > a day, no bad peaks). > > normally, shortly after a successful

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav milter: loading new database

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:02:14AM +, Nigel Horne wrote: > Update to at least 0.83b. would this be in the nightly snapshots (ie clamav-devel)? -- ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav milter: loading new database

> > Update to at least 0.83b. > > would this be in the nightly snapshots (ie clamav-devel)? Yes ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter bottleneck on 0.84?

Mike Nolan wrote: Since upgrading to 0.84 the other day, my system usage has gone through the roof, usually running between 4 and 8 but occasionally well over 12. According to 'top', virtually all of the time is being spent in clamav-milter with most of the rest in sendmail. Is it possible that

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter and key "--max-children"

Hello, 1. Why clamav-milter ignores a key "--max-children=N"? I start with key "--max-children=5", but I receive: # pstree init-+-atd |-bdaemon |-bdflush |-bserver |-clamav-milter---clamav-milter---16*[clamav-milter] 2. /usr/local/clamav/sbin/clamav-milter -h|grep Maximum

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter logfile permission error

Todd Lyons wrote: > clamav-milter: (-q && !LogSyslog): warning - all interception message > methods are off > /var/log/clamav/clamav.log: Permission denied > > Well, duh. The clamd daemon has that file open, so clamav-milter can't > open it. Can someone tell me how to tell the milter not

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter logfile permission error

Todd Lyons wrote: > > > clamav-milter: (-q && !LogSyslog): warning - all interception message > > methods are off > > /var/log/clamav/clamav.log: Permission denied > > > > Well, duh. The clamd daemon has that file open, so clamav-milter can't > > open it. Huh? Since when has one program

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter logfile permission error

Matt Fretwell wanted us to know: >> clamav-milter: (-q && !LogSyslog): warning - all interception message >> methods are off >> /var/log/clamav/clamav.log: Permission denied >> Well, duh. The clamd daemon has that file open, so clamav-milter can't >> open it. Can someone tell me how to tel

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter logfile permission error

Todd Lyons wrote: > Thank you for the sarcas^W kind words. Can you hazard a guess as to why > that works on the Gentoo box using the same config settings? That was just dry, not sarcastic :) Version difference, possibly? Matt ___ http://lurker.clama

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter "whitelist" not working?

Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You forgot to add "in my configuration", since it is working for me and > others. Your statement implies that it doesn't work at all. I'm happy to report that the CVS version *did* apparently resolve the issue of the whitelist apparently not working. The

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter ignore from host y.y.y.y

Sorry if this isn't appropriate for the clamav-users list, I couldn't easily locate a mailing list for clamav-milter. If you know of one please let me know. Is there a way to tell clamav-milter to ignore emails from a certain host or IP address? Thanks, -Jim P. __

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter bug (and workaround)

At 07:27 PM Sunday, 7/24/2005, Damian Menscher wrote -=> Just a warning to others who are about to upgrade: 0.86.2 changes the clamav-milter default timeout from 0 to 5 minutes (never mind the manpage, which still says it's 0). You can't specify a timeout in --internal mode (default) and so I

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter seems unstable with 0.87

After upgrading one of our servers to clamav 0.87, we are experience intermittent failures of clamav-milter which result sendmail refusing all mail until clamav-milter is restarted. Sometimes it will run for 24 hours or more without crashing but generally it seems to crash every few hours. Typical

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-Milter: What is "local"?

On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:19, Steven Stern wrote: > What is the definition of "local" invoked by the --local parameter for > clamav-milter? > > Here's my situation: I have a program running on an internal server > that's generating about 16,000 individual emails per day. The program > uses our

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-Milter: What is "local"?

Nigel Horne said: > On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:19, Steven Stern wrote: >> What is the definition of "local" invoked by the --local parameter for >> clamav-milter? >> >> Here's my situation: I have a program running on an internal server >> that's generating about 16,000 individual emails per day. Th

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter not binding to sendmail

Dear friends my requirement-- virus status to be shown on the header of mail messages. so I need some help on getting clamav-milter to work on sendmail.. I have done the following step 1:- Installed clam rpms clamd-0.85.1-1.1.fc.rf ,clamav-db,clamav-milter,clamav,clamav-devel step 2:- Inserted t

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & sendmail: postmaster notification

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mykhaylo > Khodorev > Hi, all! > I'm struggling with virus notification on sendmail & > clamav-milter. I've > started clamav-milter like this: > clamav-milter -Dfb /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & sendmail: postmaster notification

[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat maillog | grep k069MXPR007370 Jan 6 11:22:33 kernel sendmail[7370]: k069MXPR007370: from=root, size=352, class=0, nrcpts=3, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 6 11:22:33 kernel sendmail[7370]: k069MXPR007370: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:00:00,

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & sendmail: postmaster notification

-users] clamav-milter & sendmail: postmaster notification > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mykhaylo > Khodorev > Hi, all! > I'm struggling with virus notification on sendmail & > clamav-milter.

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & sendmail: postmaster notification

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Why? As far as I understood -b option sends a message to the postmaster... >Did I miss anything? > >Thanks >Mykhaylo > > > You're right, but with -b option message is also sent to sender. You should use -P (--postmaster-only) to send the notification only to postmaster

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & sendmail: postmaster notification

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Why? As far as I understood -b option sends a message to the postmaster... > Did I miss anything? > Do you filter mail sent to Postmaster? If so how can the postmaster get it if it doesn't pass the filter? Regardless, anything you need to know about the message can be fo

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & sendmail: postmaster notification

Dennis Peterson Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 7:13 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & sendmail: postmaster notification [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Why? As far as I understood -b option sends a message to the postmaster... > Did I miss anything? > Do yo

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter does not run

> Hello, I'm having problem with Clamav-milter. I have clamav-0.88. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -loD > /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock --max-children=2 i had trouble in the past with the o option and took it out (replaced with n) _

[Clamav-users] Clamav-milter doesn't scan for viruses!

Hi, I have recently installed clamav-milter on CentOS with this guide: --- # HOWTO install clamav-milter on CentOS & BQ to work with sendmail. # this assumes f-prot and MailScanner are installed also. # check that MILTER support is build into sendmail: sendmail -d0 < /dev/null | grep MILTER # If

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & Postfix-2.4-20061006

Am Samstag, den 21.10.2006, 08:33 -0400 schrieb Gerard Seibert: > FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE > ClamAV 0.88.5 > clamav-milter 0.88.5 > Postfix-2.4-20061006 > > > I previously had clamav-milter working on a PC with 'Sendmail' as the > MTA. My new system has 'Postfix' installed. I have no desire to change >

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter & Postfix-2.4-20061006

On Saturday 21 October 2006 10:24, Christian Rueger wrote: > what your problem? > it so easy > > postfix main.cf: > smtpd_milters = unix:/clamav/milter > > postfix work in chroot /var/spool/postfix > > clamav-milter fake sendmail.mc: > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(‘clmilter’,‘S=unix:/var/spool/postfix/clamav

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

Jon Smith wrote: clamav-milter starts without any warnings/errors. The /var/log/clamd.milter log file is completely empty. Permissions are correct, I can su to clamilt user and write to the file. Messages are be relayed but not tagged or apparently even processed by clamav-milter. Nothing inte

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

On 11/24/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jon Smith wrote: > clamav-milter starts without any warnings/errors. The /var/log/clamd.milter > log file is completely empty. Permissions are correct, I can su to clamilt > user and write to the file. Messages are be relayed but not tagg

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

Jon Smith wrote: On 11/24/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jon Smith wrote: > clamav-milter starts without any warnings/errors. The /var/log/clamd.milter > log file is completely empty. Permissions are correct, I can su to clamilt > user and write to the file. Messages are be re

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

On 11/24/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jon Smith wrote: > On 11/24/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Jon Smith wrote: >> > clamav-milter starts without any warnings/errors. The >> /var/log/clamd.milter >> > log file is completely empty. Permissions are correc

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/24/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jon Smith wrote: > > On 11/24/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Jon Smith wrote: > >> > clamav-milter starts without any warnings/errors. The > >> /var/log/clamd.m

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 at 13:34:37 -0600, Jon Smith wrote: > On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > So, apparently it's just not tagging the messages? I'm going to man > clamav-milter conf to see if maybe I just forgot to enable the addition of > the X-Spam-Status tags? Sorry if I

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

On 11/24/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 at 13:34:37 -0600, Jon Smith wrote: > On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > So, apparently it's just not tagging the messages? I'm going to man > clamav-milter conf to see if maybe I just forgot to en

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/24/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 at 13:34:37 -0600, Jon Smith wrote: > > On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > So, apparently it's just not tagging the messages? I'm going to

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/24/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 at 13:34:37 -0600, Jon Smith wrote: > > > On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > [...] > > >

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter Not Processing Messages

On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/24/06, Jon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > On 11/24/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 at 13:34:37 -0600, Jon Smith wrote: > > > > O

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter: X-Virus-Scanned inconsistency

Hi, I noticed an inconsistency with the X-Virus-Scanned: header as generated by clamav-milter (ClamAV 0.90), and I was wondering whether this is a bug or done on purpose. After (re)starting clamav-milter, it adds the following header to all scanned mails: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter 0.90.1 and duplicated messages

I recently upgraded a linux server running sendmail 8.13.8 with clamav 0.90.1, from 0.88.6. After the upgrade I had dozens of users complaining about getting duped emails, and when I look in the logs I definitely see several transactions between a sender and recipient with the exact same message

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter compiling on FreeBSD?

> (hmm, looks like clamav.elektrapro.com has been down for a while... ?) > > I installed GCC33, with no problems. > > When I go to compile from a recent snapshot release, I use the flags: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --disable-pthreads --enable-milter > --with-gcc=/usr/local/bin/gcc33 >

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter compiling on FreeBSD?

(hmm, looks like clamav.elektrapro.com has been down for a while... ?) I installed GCC33, with no problems. When I go to compile from a recent snapshot release, I use the flags: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --disable-pthreads --enable-milter --with-gcc=/usr/local/bin/gcc33 and it does not b

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter compiling on FreeBSD?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 06 Jun 2003 3:15 am, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > I can't seem to get clamav-milter to compile on FreeBSD_4.8, and I wonder > if anyone has accomplished this. You must use GCC3 which comes with the ports. See .../clamav-milter/INSTALL - -Nigel

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter compiling on FreeBSD?

Thanks Nigel, sorry for the oversight. Why, may I ask, does this depend upon GCC3? Thanks, Forrest At 02:05 AM 6/6/2003, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 06 Jun 2003 3:15 am, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > I can't seem to get clamav-milter to compile on FreeBSD_4.

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter compiling on FreeBSD?

Also, I see this in the configure output: checking libmilter/mfapi.h usability... yes checking libmilter/mfapi.h presence... yes checking for libmilter/mfapi.h... yes I re-ran everything, from a fresh untar of the latest snapshot, and still... nothing is being made in the clamd or lib-milter dire

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter compiling on FreeBSD?

Yes, libmilter files are properly installed, via the FreeBSD "sendmail-old" port. They are : /usr/local/lib/libmilter.a /usr/local/include/libmilter: mfapi.h At 01:16 PM 6/9/2003, you wrote: > (hmm, looks like clamav.elektrapro.com has been down for a while... ?) > > I installed GCC33

[Clamav-users] Clamav-milter: savemail panic, user=<> etc

I have got clamav-milter and sendmail. Its rejecting viruses OK but there are a few problems with unknown users etc turning up in my /var/log/maillog. Note the from=<> in the second line. Any ideas? Here is my sendmail.mc VERSIONID(`RCS 8.12.9') OSTYPE(linux)dnl DOMAIN(generic)dnl FEATURE(use_cw

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter ready for business?

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:29:40AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey Nigel & others, > > I'd like to test clamav-milter with some of my small clients (40 mail > users). The package with 0.60 still has that crashing problem, are the > more recent versions more stable? I really think the clama

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter and Sendmail problem.

> Hello list ! > > Quite new to clamav and sendmail in the same time, I ran into the following > problem: > > Using a Mandrake 9.1 > Sendmail 8-12-10 > clamav 0.60 Please don't use 0.60, download CVS version (snapshots available at http://clamav.sf.net/snapshot). Best regards, Tomasz Kojm --

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter and Sendmail problem.

thanks for you advice, I am trying this solution carefully but already I don't have the same bug I had before ! YES !! But I have another :( : When i try to send a virus to my local acount (eicar or SoBig) the mail arrive in the maibox but the virus is still there. And I have aboslutely no log,

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter and Sendmail problem.

Humm, you read amavis, off course, not mailfliter... Ha ha I knew it off course > And If not again, what do you think about using mailfilter plus clamav with > sendmail ? Is this a solution I could trust in ? > > Again, thank you very much for your help. > > Jerome. --

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter and Sendmail problem.

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:31:37 +0200 (CEST) Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please don't use 0.60, download CVS version (snapshots available at http://clamav.sf.net/snapshot). Being in this list for some time I could see the answer for most segfaults or compile problem was "please use lat

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter and Sendmail problem.

A better idea might be to put the "more stable" version into sourceforge for download finally. Sundie... Fajar Arief Nugraha said: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:31:37 +0200 (CEST) > Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Please don't use 0.60, download CVS version (snapshots >>available at >>ht

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter and Sendmail problem.

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:18:38 -0400 (EDT) "Stewart MacLund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A better idea might be to put the "more stable" version into > sourceforge for download finally. Just after the next stable version there will be a new release model - stable versions will be released for e

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter not doing very much..

Hi there, I'm relatively new to ClamAV, and am just setting it up on a sendmail installation of mine. I think everything's in place and OK, clamscan is happily detecting viruses from files, but when running online tests against clamav-milter & sendmail, the messages get passed through fine. It'

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter vuln. reported on bugtraq

FYI. Secure Network Operations, Inc. http://www.secnetops.com/research Strategic Reconnaissance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Team Lead Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Our Mission: Sec

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter version and clamfi_abort message

Hi, I recently upgraded to version 0.65 using the rpms for redhet (version 0.65-2). clamav-milter reports a version of 0.60p: Nov 22 09:23:41 gandalf clamav-milter[5025]: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' Running 'strings' on the clamav-milter binary

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

On Tuesday 09 December 2003 09:42 am, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Just a quick note to point out that the problem with clamd blocking and > then clamav-milter spawning a ridiculous number of chils processes is > still not fixed in the CVS snapshot from today. I see this in the logs:- > > > Dec 9 16:08:

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote: MB>Just a quick note to point out that the problem with clamd blocking and MB>then clamav-milter spawning a ridiculous number of chils processes is MB>still not fixed in the CVS snapshot from today. I see this in the logs:- MB> MB>Dec 9 16:08:49 castor cla

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

Michael Dankov wrote: > > Clamd+clamav-milter are quite unstable when clamd sessions are timed out. > More timeouts, more unstability. Current default behavior of clamav-milter > is to connect to clamd as soon as sendmail receives "mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > from mail client. Some mail clie

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Michael Dankov wrote: > >>Clamd+clamav-milter are quite unstable when clamd sessions are timed out. >>More timeouts, more unstability. Current default behavior of clamav-milter >>is to connect to clamd as soon as sendmail receives "mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" >>from mail

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 11 Dec 2003 3:43 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12303]: ClamAv: private data not NULL > Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12301]: ClamAv: private data not NULL This message does not appear in clamav-mil

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

CTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:43 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Michael Dankov wrote: > >>Clamd+clamav-milter are quite unstable when clamd sessions are timed out. >>More

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

Nigel Horne wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 11 Dec 2003 3:43 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > >>Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12303]: ClamAv: private data not NULL >>Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12301]: ClamAv: private data not NULL > > > Thi

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

Hi! On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote: MB>>>Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12303]: ClamAv: private data not NULL MB>>>Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12301]: ClamAv: private data not NULL MB> MB>CVS snapshot from 9th December. MB>$ grep "private data" ./sendmail-8.12.10/libmilte

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

Michael Dankov wrote: > Do you still have timeouts reported by clamd? Be sure you enable clamd > logging either by LogFile or LogSyslog in clamav.conf. I have "LogSyslog" set in clamav.conf, and the last time it hiccuped was this morning, starting at about 7:20. I'm not seeing explicit timeout

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

Hi! On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote: MB>Dec 12 07:16:35 castor clamav-milter[8758]: clean message from MB><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MB>Dec 12 07:18:08 castor clamav-milter[8880]: clamfi_connect: connection MB>from castor.acu.ac.uk [194.81.120.81] MB>Dec 12 07:20:23 castor clamd[12601]: SelfChe

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

What the default number of --max-children if one doesn't specify it in the command line? -Troy - Original Message - From: "Michael Dankov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 3:01 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clam

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 13 Dec 2003 4:08 pm, Internet Helpdesk wrote: > What the default number of --max-children if one doesn't specify it in the > command line? There is no default, it works the same as spamass-milter, i.e. it only caps if you tell it to. I ha

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

Michael Dankov wrote: > Hi! > > Look, two minutes before SelfCheck there is milter thread 8880 started, and > I do not see when it finishes. Is something wrong with it? I have no log entry of that one ever finishing. > At the moment I have no ideas what is going wrong in your case, following is

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

hi! On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote: MB>> Do you need to restart both clamav-milter and clamdscan, or only one of MB>> them? MB> MB>I restart both clamd and clamav-milter. Is restarting clamav-milter only makes no sense? MB>P.S. This is a dual processor box - any remote possibility o

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-users]clamav-milter

On Thursday 08 Jan 2004 2:01 am, Internet Helpdesk wrote: > At any rate, is there way to make clamav-milter produce a log or at least > produce some output on the terminal screen? The man page for clamav-milter > mentions a -x or --debug-level but these options are not recognized. They are recog

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-users]clamav-milter

ssage - From: "Nigel Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:05 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-users]clamav-milter On Thursday 08 Jan 2004 2:01 am, Internet Helpdesk wrote: > At any rate, is there way to make cla

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-users]clamav-milter

>> At any rate, is there way to make clamav-milter produce a log or at least >> produce some output on the terminal screen? The man page for >>clamav-milter >> mentions a -x or --debug-level but these options are not recognized. >They are recognised if you recompile with CL_DEBUG. >It is already

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-users]clamav-milter

On Monday 12 Jan 2004 6:06 pm, Internet Helpdesk wrote: > What do the different debug levels log? Specifically, what log level only > logs error? The higher the level the more that is debugged (-x9 debugs more than -x4). There is no logic to it, only what I needed to debug when developing the so

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter compilation problems again

On Tuesday 03 Feb 2004 3:32 am, Stevens, John wrote: > clamav-milter.c:572: `in_port_t' undeclared (first use in this function) > clamav-milter.c:572: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > clamav-milter.c:572: for each function it appears in.) Your system is missing /usr/include/net

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter compilation problems again

aimer. TUSC Computer Systems - www.tusc.com.au John Stevens - MIS Manager, Senior Project Engineer Mobile: 0419840411 Direct: 03 9840 4428 -Original Message- From: Nigel Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2004 4:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] c

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter compilation problems again

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 23:29, Stevens, John wrote: > and sorry for this stupid disclaimer. > We also have a stupid disclaimer, but one question about yours - can you have "omissions that are present"? I did think about making it a very small font, or white text on a white background - but then yo

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter compilation problems again

Ah lawyers.. You wouldn't believe how often that one is pointed out. On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 23:29, Stevens, John wrote: > and sorry for this stupid disclaimer. > We also have a stupid disclaimer, but one question about yours - can you have "omissions that are present"? --- This message

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter compilation problems again

On Wednesday 04 Feb 2004 11:29 pm, Stevens, John wrote: > Anyhoo, I cannot find a reference to in_port_t in any of the many in.h > files on my system. Remember, it is a Cobalt (Sun) RAQ3 box, pretty close > to redhat linux. So if there is a package or glibc update that I should > have, please po

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 2:03 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm > repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately painful > for me... Two other questions - has clamd died? Have you set userprocesses in clamav.conf? -N

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 2:03 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Hi, > Running Clamav and clamav-milter (now the 20040204 snapshot, but this is > an ongoing issue) with sendmail 8.12.10, and I get regular problems with > ClamAV spawning huge numbers of child processes, and generally falling > over. What o

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

Nigel Horne wrote: > On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 2:03 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > >>I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm >>repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately painful >>for me... > > > Two other questions - has clamd died? No - clamdsc

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 4:15 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > No - clamdscan still works, or did last time I tested it. What operating system? What arguments are you giving to clamav-milter? Are you using UNIX or TCP sockets to talk to clamd? -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. N

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 4:15 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > Have you set userprocesses in clamav.conf? > > No. First I've heard of it - what does it do? Not work. > Mike. -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.b

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Hi, > > I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm > repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately > painful for me... Me too. > Running Clamav and clamav-milter (now the 20040204 snapshot, but this >

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

At 05/02/2004, you wrote: Hi, I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately painful for me... Running Clamav and clamav-milter (now the 20040204 snapshot, but this is an ongoing issue) with sendmail 8.12.10, a

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:38:26 +0100 Gianmarco Giovannelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thu Feb 5 11:34:54 2004 -> Accepted connection on port 57892, fd 35 > Thu Feb 5 11:35:27 2004 -> Accepted connection on port 9254, fd 35 > Thu Feb 5 11:41:32 2004 -> Session 1 stopped due to timeout. > Thu Feb

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

Nigel Horne wrote: > On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 4:15 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > What operating system? Linux - Debian Woody. > What arguments are you giving to clamav-milter? /usr/sbin/clamav-milter --max-children=5 -olq local:/var/run/sendmail/milter/clamav.sock > Are you using UNIX or TCP socke

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

On Friday 06 Feb 2004 10:14 am, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > What arguments are you giving to clamav-milter? > > /usr/sbin/clamav-milter --max-children=5 -olq > local:/var/run/sendmail/milter/clamav.sock > > > Are you using UNIX or TCP sockets to talk to clamd? > > UNIX sockets. I can see nothing wro

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

Nigel Horne wrote: > On Friday 06 Feb 2004 10:14 am, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > >>>What arguments are you giving to clamav-milter? >> >>/usr/sbin/clamav-milter --max-children=5 -olq >>local:/var/run/sendmail/milter/clamav.sock >> >> >>>Are you using UNIX or TCP sockets to talk to clamd? >> >>UNIX s

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

> Done. Nothing obvious at startup, but I'll monitor it and post anything > that looks useful. With these options we should see all errors printed to stderr. > Mike. -Nigel --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Confere

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

Nigel Horne wrote: > I can see nothing wrong here. So try this: enable debug and foreground > in clamav.conf. Restart clamav-milter by hand from the hash prompt (by > hand I mean not through a /etc/init.d script) and see if it shows up > any issues. > > I take it you're

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >