Hello G.W. Haywood,
Am 2010-09-09 11:10:37, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
> to be from a bank. I know too much about email, and about banks.
>
> I reject mail which uses the word 'bank' anywhere in the greeting,
> the envelo
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:55:19 +0100
Ian Eiloart articulated:
> --On 9 September 2010 14:23:03 -0700 JD wrote:
> >
> > Well then, expect to get spammed by alerts that look just like
> > what the bank sends you and they will have a from address
> > identical to your bank's.
>
> But, of course, ban
--On 9 September 2010 14:23:03 -0700 JD wrote:
Well then, expect to get spammed by alerts that look just like
what the bank sends you and they will have a from address
identical to your bank's.
But, of course, banks should be using authentication mechanisms like SPF
and DKIM so that we ca
On 09/09/2010 01:32 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:13:03 -0700
JD articulated:
On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood articulated:
I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
to be from a bank. I know t
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:13:03 -0700
JD articulated:
> On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
> > G.W. Haywood articulated:
> >
> >> I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
> >> to be from a bank. I know too much about email, a
On 9/9/2010 10:13 AM, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
>> G.W. Haywood articulated:
>>
>>> I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
>>> to be from a bank. I know too much about email, and about banks.
>>>
On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood articulated:
I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
to be from a bank. I know too much about email, and about banks.
I reject mail which uses the word 'bank' anywhere in t
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood articulated:
> I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
> to be from a bank. I know too much about email, and about banks.
>
> I reject mail which uses the word 'bank' anywhere in the greeting,
> the envelope addres
- Message from edwinto...@gmail.com -
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:46:40 +0300
From: Török Edwin
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Fwd: Important mail marked as spam
To: ClamAV users ML
Cc: a...@isac.gov.in, RAKESH KUMAR , RAJIV
RATAN CHETWANI
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010
Hi there,
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 ANANT S ATHAVALE wrote:
> I have got a complaint from one of our users that, a genuine mail
> has got identified as virus:
> ...
> But, it looks like this is a false positive as the recipient has
> confirmed with the bank that such mails are being sent.
I personally
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:35:40 +0530
ANANT S ATHAVALE wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I have got a complaint from one of our users that, a genuine mail has
> got identified as virus: Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain,
> with internal reference code as ' 02103-11/QCZxxtAvePMy'.
That reference code
Dear List,
I have got a complaint from one of our users that, a genuine mail has got
identified as virus: Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain, with internal
reference code as ' 02103-11/QCZxxtAvePMy'. I don't know what exactly is the
meaning of internal reference code.
We are not quaranti
12 matches
Mail list logo
