On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Zvi Kave wrote:
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
There's only a small number of viruses in the wild. MS-DOS viruses from 10
years ago are not likely to pose a problem any longer. Having t
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 07:39 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Zvi Kave wrote:
> > Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
> > in comparison to other AV software ?
>
> There's only a small number of viruses in the wild. MS-DOS viruses from
> 10 years ago are not likely to pose a pr
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 07:39:32AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Zvi Kave wrote:
> >Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
> >in comparison to other AV software ?
>
> There's only a small number of viruses in the wild. MS-DOS viruses from
> 10 years ago are not likely to pose
Rob MacGregor wrote:
On 7/18/06, Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TK may disagree with me on this, but I have the feeling that the
above statement is not true.
I believe (TK may correct me on this) that it would be better to say
that it has evolved into the state where is it mostly
an ema
On 7/18/06, Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TK may disagree with me on this, but I have the feeling that the
above statement is not true.
I believe (TK may correct me on this) that it would be better to say
that it has evolved into the state where is it mostly
an email virus scanner. But
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Well, it was initially designed as an addition to mail scanners such as
AMaViS and also a supplement to OpenAntiVirus which was lacking a command line
scanner.
Ah yes, I'd forgotten OpenAntiVirus and the connection there.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Adjudicator, Band Trainer
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:05:34 +0100
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Maul wrote:
>
> > Not to mention that clamav was designed to be an email virus scanner.
>
> TK may disagree with me on this, but I have the feeling that the
> above statement is not true.
>
> I believe (TK may corre
Jim Maul wrote:
Not to mention that clamav was designed to be an email virus scanner.
TK may disagree with me on this, but I have the feeling that the
above statement is not true.
I believe (TK may correct me on this) that it would be better to say
that it has evolved into the state where is
Zvi Kave wrote:
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
There's only a small number of viruses in the wild. MS-DOS viruses from
10 years ago are not likely to pose a problem any longer. Having them in
your database only allows you to infl
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 17:11 +0200, Zvi Kave wrote:
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
I don't think that's true. 62 thousand signatures is a healthy amount.
main.cvd is up to date (version: 39, sigs: 58116, f
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 17:11 +0200, Zvi Kave wrote:
> Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
> in comparison to other AV software ?
I don't think that's true. 62 thousand signatures is a healthy amount.
main.cvd is up to date (version: 39, sigs: 58116, f-level: 8, builder:
tkojm
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
Thanks,
Zvi
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
12 matches
Mail list logo
