> It's not going to say 0.81 (not in the file name, at least).
That's correct. I was checking by grepping the "strings" output from each
of the files. Here are my libraries:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 365010 Mar 4 14:59 /usr/local/lib/libclamav.a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Mar 4 14:59
>
>
> >> I have it working flawlessly on FreeBSD, too; so I know it works. :)
> >
> > I don't doubt at all that the problem is on my end. I just for the life
> > of me can't figure out what it is. I've been doing this kind of thing for
> > a long long time and it's just not apparent to me what
>> I have it working flawlessly on FreeBSD, too; so I know it works. :)
>
> I don't doubt at all that the problem is on my end. I just for the life
> of me can't figure out what it is. I've been doing this kind of thing for
> a long long time and it's just not apparent to me what the problem is.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Jerry Bell wrote:
> I would have expected *some* trace of an old lib somewhere. I can't find
> anything anywhere that has a version number of 0.81.
It's not going to say 0.81 (not in the file name, at least).
Ie: on my system, in /usr/local/lib I have:
-rw-r--r--1 root
On March 9, 2005 11:44 am, Jerry Bell wrote:
> > find -X / -name "libclamav.so.1" | xargs ls -la
> No luck there :(
> >> /usr/local/lib//usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1.
> That is what you call a careless cut and paste. It is really
> /usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1
> I would have expected *some* tr
> I have it working flawlessly on FreeBSD, too; so I know it works. :)
I don't doubt at all that the problem is on my end. I just for the life
of me can't figure out what it is. I've been doing this kind of thing for
a long long time and it's just not apparent to me what the problem is.
Normall
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Bell
> Sent: woensdag 9 maart 2005 19:48
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Two persistent problems with clamav
>
>
> Thank you for the detail
>
> Thank you for the detail here. Unfortunately, I had already done much of
> that. ldd confirms that both clamd and freshclam are linked to
> /usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1
And yet the problem exists. My self analysis when this happens is to assure
myself that something I am certain of is wron
>
> Since this problem show up so often isn't it a idea to take care of with a
> software solution instead of telling the user to search the archives?
>
> Ok, you can argue that it is not a fault in the software and the users own
> fault but since it happens so often it might be good support to
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 13:47 -0500, Jerry Bell wrote:
> Likewise, I have run strings on all libraries in /usr/local/lib and
> /usr/lib looking for the string 0\.81 and have only found
> /usr/local/lib//usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1.
Are you running under a chroot() somewhere?
-trog
signature.as
Thank you for the detail here. Unfortunately, I had already done much of
that. ldd confirms that both clamd and freshclam are linked to
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1
When I shut down clamd and freshclam, move that library out, and try to
restart, both clamd and freshclam bomb out saying the libr
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Johan Barelds wrote:
> Since this problem show up so often isn't it a idea to take care of with a
> software solution instead of telling the user to search the archives?
I haven't run into this myself, but I have to say I've only seen this issue
come on the the Clam list.
N
Since this problem show up so often isn't it a idea to take care of with a
software solution instead of telling the user to search the archives?
Ok, you can argue that it is not a fault in the software and the users own
fault but since it happens so often it might be good support to take care of
Jerry Bell said:
>> A properly installed new version. Read the archives of this list.
>
> I've done so, and there are a lot of "what does this mean", and a fair
> number of people who have half installed old versions. I don't think that
> is the case for me.
Jerry - somewhere in your library path
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:26:52 -0500 (EST)
"Jerry Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems clear to me that I've got the right version, but SOMETHING is
You've got the right version using old libs. Search the archives.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\.
> A properly installed new version. Read the archives of this list.
I've done so, and there are a lot of "what does this mean", and a fair
number of people who have half installed old versions. I don't think that
is the case for me.
When I start up freshclam, I see this:
freshclam daemon 0.83 (O
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:54:22 -0500 (EST)
"Jerry Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trace of 0.81. But still it keeps happening! What am I missing?
A properly installed new version. Read the archives of this list.
> The database directory is /var/db/clamav. The permissions as as such:
Does it ma
I'm having two pretty persistent problems with clamav. The first is that
clamav is complaining about my version being out of date:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately!
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately!
WARNING: Local v
18 matches
Mail list logo
