Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-02-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 19:25:36 +, Antony Stone wrote: Clamscan's working fine for me here (Linux 2.4.23, ClamAV 0.60, with the big database update just released, therefore 27645 signatures). 27645? How come? The database at the moment contains 19799 signatures. could be the trouble with

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 08 January 2004 7:17 pm, mantor wrote: Jan 8 13:29:31 filter2 /kernel: pid 63342 (clamscan), uid 1003: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) that happend today dont know what going on but i uninstalled clamscan reinstalled then it started working again but after i manually updated

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread mantor
freebsd 4.9 clamav 0.65 might not notice if your just scanning it regularly also i know this might not be clamav problem but was searching through the logs and found this and thats when it started Jan 7 21:08:07 filter2 X-Qmail-Scanner-1.20: [filter2107352768646113762] clamscan: corrupt or

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 08 January 2004 8:16 pm, Antony Stone wrote: On Thursday 08 January 2004 8:07 pm, Tomasz Papszun wrote: On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 19:25:36 +, Antony Stone wrote: Clamscan's working fine for me here (Linux 2.4.23, ClamAV 0.60, with the big database update just released,

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 08 January 2004 8:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz, On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:07, Tomasz Papszun wrote: 27645? How come? The database at the moment contains 19799 signatures. Here's what I'm seeing on (on 2 different linux/ia32 machines): Thu Jan 8 06:14:11 2004 -

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tomasz Papszun wrote: On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 19:25:36 +, Antony Stone wrote: Clamscan's working fine for me here (Linux 2.4.23, ClamAV 0.60, with the big database update just released, therefore 27645 signatures). 27645? How come? The database at the moment contains 19799 signatures. I

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:40, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: I think this happens everytime somebody updates an old installation that used the *.db file to the new *.cvd format without deleting the old files. clamd then somehow reports the sum of the signatures in these files(!). That's

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On 08 Jan 2004 14:40:42 -0500 mantor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: freebsd 4.9 clamav 0.65 might not notice if your just scanning it regularly also i know this might not be clamav problem but was searching through the logs and found this and thats when it started Jan 7 21:08:07 filter2

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread Stewart MacLund
on my last reload... SelfCheck: Database modification detected. Forcing reload. Reading databases from /usr/local/share/clamav Database correctly reloaded (29930 viruses) $ clamd -V clamd / ClamAV version 0.65 4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC #1 on another server... Verbose logging activated. Reading

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread mantor
Sorry my bad it really was a qmail-scanner problem. After that big update to the virus database the scanner supposedly pooped and needed more memory so what i did is update the setting from 20 megs to 40 megs in the softlimit seems to fine now. Sorry for that panic On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:07,

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 21:45:47 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On 08 Jan 2004 14:40:42 -0500 mantor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also i know this might not be clamav problem but was searching through the logs and found this and thats when it started Jan 7 21:08:07 filter2 X-Qmail-Scanner-1.20:

Re: [Clamav-users] is the virus db screwed up ?

2004-01-08 Thread mantor
that caught me off guard didn't know what was happening till i really thought bout it well thanks for the update btw great virus scanner and thanks for your time :) On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 16:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote: On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 21:45:47 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On 08 Jan 2004