Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

> On 8 Mar 2018, at 9:08 am, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > > What definitely isn't fine is this endless griping about how people > should phrase their questions differently, know more than they do, have > read this and that (blindly assuming that they hadn't) and so on which >

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

Tilman is correct. Thank you. Reindl, it is not productive, nor helpful on an Open Source product to berate people like that. That does not foster a sense of community, and helps no one. We can't expect people to come here and ask for help and work out the problems with our answers and

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

I'll take the blame for the flame. I registered on the list in haste in order to add my experience to the discussion about the warning message that I was then reading on the archive web page, in threaded view. I my mind, my post would pick up that thread. I completely forgot about the

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

What definitely isn't fine is this endless griping about how people should phrase their questions differently, know more than they do, have read this and that (blindly assuming that they hadn't) and so on which contributes exactly nothing to a solution. What isn't fine either is rude language.

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

Am 07.03.2018 um 22:10 schrieb Joel Esler (jesler): Which is perfectly fine. The mailing lists are the correct place for people to ask for help. Should people read the archives? Yes. Should people read FAQs? Yes. But largely, they won't. So we need to help our community. nothing is

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

Thanks for the information. The problem- we are aware of and will fix. Sorry for the confusion, and thank you for making us aware! Thanks, Tom McCourt | Talos: Open Source Team| tmcco...@cisco.com On 3/7/18, 4:37 PM, "clamav-users on behalf of Brian Fluet"

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

FWIW, I used the clamav-0.99.4-win-x86.zip download to upgrade. One of the versions noted in the freshclam log warning entry is "clamav-0.99.4". Significant??? On 7 Mar 2018 at 21:10, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote, at least in part: > Which is perfectly fine. The mailing lists are the correct

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

Which is perfectly fine. The mailing lists are the correct place for people to ask for help. Should people read the archives? Yes. Should people read FAQs? Yes. But largely, they won't. So we need to help our community. -- Joel Esler | Talos: Manager |

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

Am 07.03.2018 um 19:01 schrieb Freddie Cash: If you would take the time to actually read the message if only the OP would have taken time to mention the exact message unasked in his original post - i love people starting with "I just subscribed to the list in the hopes of understanding the

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.99.4 has been released!

If you would take the time to actually read the message, you'd see that freshclam is routing the local version as 0.99.4 and complaining that is behind the recommended version of 0.99.4. IOW, it's a spurious error message that's complaining incorrectly. Something the ClamAV devs will need to fix.