Hi all,
Was subscribed to this mailing list for some time and didn't respond to
it that much, but this topic really got my attention.
What rubbish... ClamAV always lags behind the commercial vendors in
any comparative you wish to mention.
The majority of well established vendors will also do
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 15:21 +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
but call paid prebuildt software always better is not correct, but mostly
just marketing
What rubbish... ClamAV always lags behind the commercial vendors in
any comparative you wish to mention.
The majority of well established vendors
On Mon 06/Oct/2014 15:37:34 +0200 Tim Smith wrote:
are you really trying to compare response times from PAID
solutions to the free/community maintained ones
Of course not, the paid solutions will always be better.
Careful betting on that... It's the famous-last-words sort of phrase.
On Oct 3, 2014, at 5:12 PM, Dennis Peterson denni...@inetnw.com wrote:
On 10/3/14 8:10:24AM, Mark Allan wrote:
On 3 Oct 2014, at 03:39 pm, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Friday 03 October 2014 07:19:13 Tim Smith did opine
Over the last 24-48 hours, I submitted a number of email
exactly
On 10/3/2014 4:54 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
On 03/10/14 08:19, Tim Smith wrote:
All of the commercial vendors I submitted the samples to had analysed
and created samples in timeframes ranging from hours to one day.
At this rate I'm going to be dumping ClamAV from my systems and
On Oct 3, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Dennis Peterson denni...@inetnw.com wrote:
On 10/3/14 2:11:15PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Oct 3, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues leolis...@solutti.com.br
wrote:
On 03/10/14 08:19, Tim Smith wrote:
All of the commercial vendors I submitted the samples to
Gene,
Perhaps you should consider submitted them in a compressed file format
that is NOT proprietary to apple and which carries a per seat license fee?
How about ***YOU*** consider the fact that I was merely submitting a
RAR file becasue that was the exact file that was received in my email
!
are you really trying to compare response times from PAID sollutions to the
free/community maintened ones
Of course not, the paid solutions will always be better.
But three days to get some definitions pushed out for a zero-day is a
bit on the slow side, you must agree !
On October 6, 2014 3:37:34 PM Tim Smith randomd...@gmail.com wrote:
are you really trying to compare response times from PAID sollutions to
the free/community maintened ones ?
Of course not, the paid solutions will always be better.
Dream on, my commodore 64 is the best 8bit computer ever
On 06/10/2014 14:37, Tim Smith wrote:
are you really trying to compare response times from PAID sollutions to the
free/community maintened ones
Of course not, the paid solutions will always be better.
But three days to get some definitions pushed out for a zero-day is a
bit on the slow
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Tim Smith randomd...@gmail.com wrote:
are you really trying to compare response times from PAID sollutions to
the free/community maintened ones
Of course not, the paid solutions will always be better.
But three days to get some definitions pushed out
If you think it needs to be quicker, then maybe you could volunteer your
time to help with the analysis (I'm not sure how you'd go about this)
http://blog.clamav.net/2014/02/introducing-clamav-community-signatures.html
- Alain
___
Help us build a
but call paid prebuildt software always better is not correct, but mostly
just marketing
What rubbish... ClamAV always lags behind the commercial vendors in
any comparative you wish to mention.
The majority of well established vendors will also do a better job of
detecting and pushing out
On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Tim Smith randomd...@gmail.com wrote:
but call paid prebuildt software always better is not correct, but mostly
just marketing
What rubbish... ClamAV always lags behind the commercial vendors in
any comparative you wish to mention.
The majority of well
On 06/10/2014 15:21, Tim Smith wrote:
but call paid prebuildt software always better is not correct, but mostly just
marketing
What rubbish... ClamAV always lags behind the commercial vendors in
any comparative you wish to mention.
Not if I want to make my own signatures...
It also beats
Le lundi 6 octobre 2014, 10:05:11 Alain Zidouemba a écrit :
If you think it needs to be quicker, then maybe you could volunteer your
time to help with the analysis (I'm not sure how you'd go about this)
Or use this :
On October 6, 2014 4:21:58 PM Tim Smith randomd...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously, why should I mess around with creating virus signatures,
its a waste of my time.
Well sayed, this maillist here is not waste of your time, can you pay back
now ?
___
On 10/06/2014 08:32 AM, Webmaster wrote:
Le lundi 6 octobre 2014, 10:05:11 Alain Zidouemba a écrit :
If you think it needs to be quicker, then maybe you could volunteer your
time to help with the analysis (I'm not sure how you'd go about this)
Or use this :
On 10/6/14 7:21 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Seriously, why should I mess around with creating virus signatures, its a
waste of my time.
Because that is the norm for community-supported products and because nobody but
you is ultimately responsible for protecting your systems from malware.
dp
Hi,
Speaking of SecuriteInfo, is the High Risk label deserved
for the spam_marketing signatures? Have used all the others
in the Securite list but that one.
Yes, spam_marketing.ndb has high level of false positive. Why ? Because it
focuses french spam/marketing/private selling/special
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Steve Basford wrote:
Slightly off topic, does anyone have a folder full of saved malware
zips/rars etc. they have kept over the past xxx months, if so can U
contact me off-list...
I don't, exactly, but I do keep records and do I look at them.
Firstly I'm only
Hi,
Over the last 24-48 hours, I submitted a number of email attachments.
RAR files that contained viruses.
Running one or two of them through VirusTotal today, I see ClamAV have
*STILL* not managed to produce virus definitions for them !
All of the commercial vendors I submitted the samples to
On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Tim Smith randomd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Over the last 24-48 hours, I submitted a number of email attachments.
RAR files that contained viruses.
Running one or two of them through VirusTotal today, I see ClamAV have
*STILL* not managed to produce virus
On 03/10/14 08:19, Tim Smith wrote:
All of the commercial vendors I submitted the samples to had analysed
and created samples in timeframes ranging from hours to one day.
At this rate I'm going to be dumping ClamAV from my systems and
subscribing to a service from a commercial vendor .
On Oct 3, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues leolis...@solutti.com.br wrote:
On 03/10/14 08:19, Tim Smith wrote:
All of the commercial vendors I submitted the samples to had analysed
and created samples in timeframes ranging from hours to one day.
At this rate I'm going to be dumping
On 10/3/14 8:10:24AM, Mark Allan wrote:
On 3 Oct 2014, at 03:39 pm, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Friday 03 October 2014 07:19:13 Tim Smith did opine
Over the last 24-48 hours, I submitted a number of email attachments.
RAR files that contained viruses.
Running one or two of them
On 10/3/14 2:11:15PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Oct 3, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues leolis...@solutti.com.br wrote:
On 03/10/14 08:19, Tim Smith wrote:
All of the commercial vendors I submitted the samples to had analysed
and created samples in timeframes ranging from hours to one day.
27 matches
Mail list logo
