[clamav-users] clamav-users-bounces DKIM signature verify error

2014-05-28 Thread Marcello Lupo
Hello, from some days I moved my domain on a DKIM capable server and I’m getting some of this: ** 2014-05-28 18:06:42.217820500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from remote rcpt <> : sender accepted 2014-05-28 18:06:42.222425500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-users-bounces DKIM signature verify error

2014-05-28 Thread Simon Hobson
Marcello Lupo wrote: > Have you any idea of the reason for this problem and how to let it go away? Other than "DKIM breaks stuff" > As now I’m loosing some messages from the list for sure. Stop using mailing lists OR stop using DKIM Or you might be able to tune DKIM to exclude the message cont

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-users-bounces DKIM signature verify error

2014-05-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 17:31:27 Simon Hobson wrote: > Marcello Lupo wrote: > > Have you any idea of the reason for this problem and how to let it go > > away? > > Other than "DKIM breaks stuff" > > > As now I’m loosing some messages from the list for sure. > > Stop using mailing lists OR st

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-users-bounces DKIM signature verify error

2014-05-28 Thread Simon Hobson
Scott Kitterman wrote: > ... but isn't this a bit off topic? Yes it is - but the OP asked here as he was having problems with this list. > In this particular case, he's got a local configuration issue nothing really > to > do with clamav, SPF, or DKIM (as a protocol). Yes it's a local config

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-users-bounces DKIM signature verify error

2014-05-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 07:42:00 Simon Hobson wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > ... but isn't this a bit off topic? > > Yes it is - but the OP asked here as he was having problems with this list. > > > In this particular case, he's got a local configuration issue nothing > > really to do wit

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-users-bounces DKIM signature verify error

2014-05-29 Thread Simon Hobson
Scott Kitterman wrote: > No, sending bounces to the list is his problem. Sorry, but that's a relatively common techie attitude - ignore the fact that the end user probably has no idea what's going on (else why ask for help about it ?) From the USER perspective, he has a problem with "using thi