I'm not aware of any free Java debuggers. The Cygnus folks are enhancing
gdb to work with Java code, but that is probably only for classes that have
been compiled to native object code using their gjc frontend.
--
Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
Kimberley Burchett wrote:
> I have a few questions before I volunteer to help with the AWT:
Thanks for writing!
> - What is the point of the peer architecture? If each peer has a
> non-peer counterpart, why not do everything directly in the non-peer?
> (I've been wondering the answer to this q
Paul Fisher wrote:
> We could use plenty of help with the AWT. Jim and I have implemented
> the majority of the peers, but all the AWT classes have yet to be
> written. Then, after we finish all of that, we have to get started on
> the 1.2 AWT.
I have a few questions before I volunteer to help
Is there a nice GPL/LGPLed java debugger available? Sun's JDK
contains jdb which depends on propietary sun.tools.debug classes. The
debugger uses a propietary communications protocol that will not be
released in Java 1.0/1.1. With the new Java 1.2 debugging architecture,
it should be easy to
John Keiser wrote:
> > From: Aaron M. Renn
> >
> > Hmm. If you're 90% done, it doesn't look like you need any help!
> > Your free
> > version is probably good enough. I'm not sure that we need to distribute
> > tools as part of Classpath anyway. I was thinking that there might be a
> > pack
> From: Aaron M. Renn
>
> Moses DeJong wrote:
> > I am also working on a jar replacement program for the Kaffe project. My
> > version is about 90% done and does some of the new 1.2 style jar stuff
> > (like the -C argument to change dirs). The jar update and creation of
> > uncompressed archives
Aaron M. Renn writes:
> Per usual I was thinking
> of something more ambitious. To the best of my knowledge there is no
> standard parsing API. I was thinking that there should be a "parselet" API
> for applications that need to parse Java source files (JavaDeps, JavaDoc,
> etc).
This is a
I believe it's time to start thinking about dropping the Classpath
project and moving on to implement a free version of COOL. :)
``Microsoft jilts Java tool''
http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?990213.ehcool.htm>
*ahem*. Back to coding...
--
Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Is the UML tool open source also? I've been looking for just such a tool
> >for quite a while. I don't know of a good one yet for Linux.
>
> It'll be, but it's too early to release something. If you need such a tool
> now, you'll have to use Together/J whiteboard edition (only class
> diagram
> I think @fixme or
>@todo would be better
>choices than @XXX
I agree, and vote for @todo
John, that's an excellent idea that will add significant value to an already
powerful tool.
>Minor correction;
>gnu.bytecode does support
>disassembly (see
>gnu.bytecode.dump). It isn't
>the same output format as
>javap, but I
>don't think that's an issue.
It could be if someone else's development tool relies on format.
Hi!
On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 Daniel Rall wrote:
>> I work on a UML tool and my task is to do the source parsing. I use JavaCC
>> with modified example grammars at this time, but there's a
>> problem with the
>> grammar distribution, and so I'm looking for an alternative.
>
>Is the UML tool open
13 matches
Mail list logo
