"Peter C. Mehlitz" wrote:
> > so, what exactly are these features? the delegate stuff? extra bytecodes?
> > please to give pointer :)
>
> Don't panic, just ask :-) The Microsoft sponsored work includes:
>
> - Win32 port (incl. native widget AWT)
> - J/Direct support
> - Delegation
> - COM suppo
Jochen Hoenicke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just committed the jdk 1.2 Reference classes java.lang.ref.
> They don't have any special functionality. This should be AFAIK
> implemented by the garbage collection.
unfortunately, the JDK1.2 Reference classes do a lot more -- they
actually have some
"Aaron M. Renn" wrote:
> Transvirtual has added support to Kaffe for the MS Visual J++ features that
> the court ordered MS to remove from that product due to MS's contract
> with Sun. See:
so, what exactly are these features? the delegate stuff? extra bytecodes?
please to give pointer :)
x
"Aaron M. Renn" wrote:
> Stuart Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > A while back Aaron posted about working on an 0.01 release which would
> > be feature-rich enough to encourage some outside use of Classpath. I was
> > wondering what the showstoppers are for making such a release, and what
>
I made some minor fixes, and now japhar + classpath works for the japhar
tests that I tried. :)
xtoph
"Aaron M. Renn" wrote:
> >> I don't think so. I haven't changed anything in java.io at least. It
> still
> >> works great with Japhar 0.07. Even the latest Classpath CVS is working
> with
> >> that.
> >
> >strange. since there are native methods in java.io.FileDescriptor (for
> >example) that
it's strange. have classes (like java.lang.reflect.Method and
java.io.FileDescriptor) changed their native methods and/or the way they
deal with their native state? i'm fixing problems as I find them, and
getting further and further towards executing hello world with the
current japhar and class
Brian Jones wrote:
> Maksim Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW, I'm not sure that providing a plug-in replacement is a particularly
> > good idea (though I wouldn't complain if someone did it) since it would
> > take huge resources and swing isn't particaulrly brillant anyway (nice
> > yes
"Aaron M. Renn" wrote:
> Paul Fisher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in message 72:
> > I'm being forced to come out of my AWT/JDK development hole to do work
> > on Japhar w/ Classpath.
> >
> > Now, if I could only get things to run :)
> >
> > Japhar is segfaulting on me -- in pop_frame.
> >
> > S
John Keiser wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Just ran across this today, it's been lifted from
> > http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-02/lw-02-letters.html>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > But there's a better alternative: Forget Sun, and use free Java
> > implementations such as
Now that 0.07 is out (ack, need to update the webpage! :) I'm thinking
of merging the JDK_12_BRANCH back onto the head. The code there is
faster than what's on the trunk, runs javac from both the JDK1.1
classes.zip and the JDK1.2fcs distribution's .jar files, deals with
exceptions properly, and i
John Keiser wrote:
> > From: Bernd Kreimeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > > > I'd install the libraries in the JVM specific "lib" directory.
> >
> > Kaffe 1.0b1 use of the JDK 1.2 Invocation API:
> > vm_args.librarypath = "/opt/local/share/kaffe/lib/i386-linux/";
>
this isn't the 1.2 in
12 matches
Mail list logo
