Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-11 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Brian, --- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Bugs 744, 835, 1190, 1966 (this is all the bugs) > on Savannah > > And 2105. A bug in TreeMap.sucessor reported by > Dalibor Topic was > fixed by Eric. Thanks Eric! I'll look into some other

Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-11 Thread Brian Jones
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll look into some other Classpath-vs-Kaffe > collections issues, and post bug reports if I find > any. Okay. > > > * Resolve javax.sound - http://tritonus.org/ > > > > Want to try this out and hopefully point users to > > it. > > I've merged it in

Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-11 Thread Dalibor Topic
--- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, I think it could be possible to use JTidy to > > implement parts of javax.swing.text.html, if > someone > > wants to do it. Or to use GNU JAXP, but I'd guess > that > > JTydy would be a more failure tolerant solution. > > Swing is nearly as bi

RE: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-12 Thread Cierniak, Michal
Brian Jones wrote: > I've not heard anything out of the ORP team in quite a while, > but would like to know if that project is still alive or not. We are still working on ORP but we haven't been keeping up with the Classpath work and we are still on the old version. I'll see what we can do but

Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-27 Thread Brian Jones
Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Below is my update on where we're at with the next release. Comments > welcome. > > > For those who aren't aware, gcc is preparing a 3.3 release in a couple > > of months. I'd like to make a new Classpath release, perhaps in the > > next few weeks, depe

Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-28 Thread John Leuner
> > 722 ignore supported timeout... 2002-Nov-26 10:10 mark > > 728 fixes to sorting arrays 2002-Nov-26 11:08 jewel > > With no objections these patches will not be integrated before the > release. Julian, do you have any more information about these patches? I look

Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-28 Thread John Leuner
> > There is a status page here for GCJ, > > http://gcc.gnu.org/java/gcj-3.3-status.html. I haven't gone through > > the errors encountered with running Mauve with Kissme yet though they > > are posted on the project web page. > > I have started working at these, but these will simply need to be

Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-28 Thread Brian Jones
John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There is a status page here for GCJ, > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/java/gcj-3.3-status.html. I haven't gone through > > > the errors encountered with running Mauve with Kissme yet though they > > > are posted on the project web page. > > > > I have starte

Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-28 Thread Julian Dolby
by/Watson/IBM@IBMUS a> cc: GNU Classpath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]

2003-01-28 Thread Brian Jones
Julian Dolby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > RedHat 7.3 and 8.0 systems the man page provided for `man 7 socket' claims > the following: > >SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO > Specify the sending or receiving timeouts until > reporting an error. They are fixed t