Re: Free Swing runs with JGoodies Forms

2005-12-07 Thread Anthony Balkissoon
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 02:26 +0100, Robert Schuster wrote: Thanks to all Swing hackers!!! Hey! I'm a Swing Hacker! You're welcome! Took a look at the screenshots, that's awesome! --Tony ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org

Re: Free Swing runs with JGoodies Forms

2005-12-06 Thread Dalibor Topic
Robert Schuster wrote: Thanks to all Swing hackers!!! JGoodies Forms, which contains a layout manager and some glue classes to make it harder to write bad GUIs, works with free Swing! Great! But ... where is the obligatory screenshot? :) cheers, dalibor topic

Re: Free Swing runs with JGoodies Forms

2005-12-06 Thread Robert Schuster
Great! But ... where is the obligatory screenshot? :) Yes. yes. Here it is: http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~rschuste/ffmki-classpath.png (running on JamVM Classpath 0.19+CVS) For reference. The same dialogs on JDK 1.5: http://bitecode.de/wiki/images/2/24/09-2004-launcher2.jpg

Free Swing runs with JGoodies Forms

2005-12-05 Thread Robert Schuster
Thanks to all Swing hackers!!! JGoodies Forms, which contains a layout manager and some glue classes to make it harder to write bad GUIs, works with free Swing! This is so cool since my pet project Freefodder uses these libraries and I remember seeing tons of exception messages when trying

Re: A free swing milestone?

2005-10-02 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi David, On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 17:17 +, David Gilbert wrote: Today I was able to load and run to completion the JCommon test suite via JUnit's Swing-based test runner using JamVM and GNU Classpath CVS - here is a screen shot: http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/junit-free.png

Re: A free swing milestone?

2005-10-02 Thread David Gilbert
to polish up as a showcase for our free swing, because it is relatively simple, yet it is recognisable as a real-world application to the majority of Java developers (most of whom know about JUnit already). Regards, Dave P.S. If you prefer compiling the source code yourself before running

Re: A free swing milestone?

2005-10-02 Thread Mark Wielaard
for us to polish up as a showcase for our free swing, because it is relatively simple, yet it is recognisable as a real-world application to the majority of Java developers (most of whom know about JUnit already). The only failures seemed to be Serialization issues with Font. I added some

Re: A free swing milestone?

2005-09-29 Thread Roman Kennke
Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2005, 17:17 + schrieb David Gilbert: Perhaps I'm just the last to notice, but... Today I was able to load and run to completion the JCommon test suite via JUnit's Swing-based test runner using JamVM and GNU Classpath CVS - here is a screen shot:

A free swing milestone?

2005-09-28 Thread David Gilbert
Perhaps I'm just the last to notice, but... Today I was able to load and run to completion the JCommon test suite via JUnit's Swing-based test runner using JamVM and GNU Classpath CVS - here is a screen shot: http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/junit-free.png There are a few visible

Re: A free swing milestone?

2005-09-28 Thread Clemens Eisserer
http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/junit-free.png There are a few visible layout problems, but it worked! Thanks to all!! Wow - looks pretty impressive. Great job free swing hackers - thanks a lot! lg Clemens ___ Classpath mailing list

Re: Free Swing?

1999-03-30 Thread Christoph Toshok
Brian Jones wrote: Maksim Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, I'm not sure that providing a plug-in replacement is a particularly good idea (though I wouldn't complain if someone did it) since it would take huge resources and swing isn't particaulrly brillant anyway (nice yes - great

Re: Free Swing?

1999-03-30 Thread Daniel Rall
I thought that the whole point of the "javax" prefix was to denote things that weren't standardized as part of the core library set -- java eXtensions. I thought so as well. Servlets were part of the standard Java package while still having a javax prefix, but were later removed. Confusion

Re: Free Swing?

1999-03-30 Thread Chris Dailey
I thought that the whole point of the "javax" prefix was to denote things that weren't standardized as part of the core library set -- java eXtensions. I thought so as well. Servlets were part of the standard Java package while still having a javax prefix, but were later removed.

Re: Free Swing?

1999-03-29 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
) for Classpath? Is this possible - as a drop-in replacement? Is there significant overlap (in pure Java code) with the free Swing implemetation? The reason I'm asking: I am looking for a lightweight LGPL AWT implementation that is standalone (not VM specific) and has a minimal native X11 peer that I can

Re: Free Swing?

1999-03-29 Thread Maksim Lin
I'm not sure if this is quite what your looking for, but I've found a nice awt-type toolikit called dogui (http://www.dog.net.uk/knife/) whihc provides a replacement some extra widgets to the awt and has a nice swing-metal LF. I think it is only dependent on the basic bits of the awt (like

Re: Free Swing?

1999-03-29 Thread Brian Jones
Bernd Kreimeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul Fisher writes: Is there a free implementation of Swing avalible The GNU Classpath project URL:http://www.classpath.org has started work on a free implementation of Swing; however, it will be some time before it's completed. Is