Title: I wish to help
I would like to contribute to the classpath project.
I would like to ask the current developers where I
can be of the most use. I have several years of JNI
experience and have worked on several open source GUI
toolkits. I know the GTK library stack very well and
Hi,
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 13:02, Jeffrey Morgan wrote:
> I would like to contribute to the classpath project.
Thanks. That would be very nice!
We have a little document to help people get up to speed fast.
The GNU Classpath Hacker's Guide:
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/doc/hacking.html
B
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris Gray said that they wanted to relicense it if needed but I
> don't know if they are actually going to donate it to the FSF for
> inclusion in the GNU Classpath project. Note however that Rudolph is
> not a peer based implementation.
I'm trying to
Hi,
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 01:23, Brian Jones wrote:
> Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Chris Gray said that they wanted to relicense it if needed but I
> > don't know if they are actually going to donate it to the FSF for
> > inclusion in the GNU Classpath project. Note however tha
Hi,
On Thursday 31 October 2002 12:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Has someone actually tried Rudolph with GNU Classpath?
Yes, it is running quite well here. But we replaced many native methods (all
but 5) by Java code. Since Rudolph uses a proprietary interface, this
replacement might be interestin
> "Andy" == Andy Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Not only that but it also doesn't depend on GTK. I think it
Andy> would be great to separate the top level graphics stuff from the
Andy> low level peer classes by a common, well-defined interface.
Andy> I expect that the sooner we agre
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Also take into account that Wonka contains only the java.awt,
Mark> java.awt.event and java.awt.image packages. We have that and
Mark> java.awt.color, java.awt.datatransfer, java.awt.dnd, java.awt.dnd.peer,
Mark> java.awt.font, java.
Hi,
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 14:32, Andy Walter wrote:
> On Thursday 31 October 2002 12:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Has someone actually tried Rudolph with GNU Classpath?
>
> Yes, it is running quite well here. But we replaced many native methods (all
> but 5) by Java code. Since Rudolph uses a pr
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 01:23, Brian Jones wrote:
> > Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Chris Gray said that they wanted to relicense it if needed but I
> > > don't know if they are actually going to donate it to the FSF for
> > > inclus
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think as with any merge, something like this must be done
> class-by-class with careful attention paid to preserving the benefits
> of both implementations.
A merge of the software remains impossible in this manner. If there
are useful parts that might
Hi,
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 02:08, Brian Jones wrote:
>
> So I'm pretty much of the opinion that Classpath's AWT just needs a
> little TLC from someone dedicated to it for a while to make it
> useable. Having JVMs without major threading issues will aid this
> development. This is why I would per
On 31 Oct 2002, Brian Jones wrote:
> So I'm pretty much of the opinion that Classpath's AWT just needs a
> little TLC from someone dedicated to it for a while to make it
> useable. Having JVMs without major threading issues will aid this
> development. This is why I would personally develop the
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Andy Walter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 31 October 2002 12:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Has someone actually tried Rudolph with GNU Classpath?
>
> Yes, it is running quite well here. But we replaced many native methods (all
> but 5) by Java code. Since Rudolph uses a propr
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Chris Gray wrote:
> Although The Boss is now back, I haven't yet cornered him to double-check
> this. However I'm sure that to get into our main source tree, code would
> need to be assigned to us, or at least released under a licence no more
> restrictive than BSD: anything
Hi,
On Thursday 31 October 2002 22:45, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > [Rudolph + GNU Classpath]
>
> Nice. Do you use any of the non-rudolph java.awt.* packages/classes?
No. Sorry if I got that wrong. We use Classpath, except from AWT and
java.lang, and the modified AWT classes from Rudolph. So far, we
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Andy Walter wrote:
> I am no graphics specialist, so I can't tell. I'll ask our AWT developers
> about that. However, I would expect that there are changes necessary in all
> three implementations (Rudolph, Classpath, and our modified Rudolph), so
> before going into technic
Hi,
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 10:50, Chris Gray wrote:
>
> Although The Boss is now back, I haven't yet cornered him to double-check
> this. However I'm sure that to get into our main source tree, code would
> need to be assigned to us, or at least released under a licence no more
> restrictive tha
Hi,
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 15:20, Andy Walter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 31 October 2002 22:45, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > [Rudolph + GNU Classpath]
> >
> > Nice. Do you use any of the non-rudolph java.awt.* packages/classes?
>
> No. Sorry if I got that wrong. We use Classpath, except from AWT
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is a pity we weren't able to clarify the license enough back in
> January when Etienne Gagnon was pushing for this so that we could
> accept his contributions.
Etienne is a contributing member of GNU Classpath, paperwork and CVS
access and everything
Hi,
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:37, Brian Jones wrote:
> Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It is a pity we weren't able to clarify the license enough back in
> > January when Etienne Gagnon was pushing for this so that we could
> > accept his contributions.
>
> Etienne is a contributi
Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It remains a possibility that if Acunia's current AWT is dual licensed
> > in the manner Chris described that parts of this work could be
> > integrated as an external library to provide optional functionality in
> > Classpath's AWT. So inspection of th
Andy Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am no graphics specialist, so I can't tell. I'll ask our AWT developers
> about that. However, I would expect that there are changes necessary in all
> three implementations (Rudolph, Classpath, and our modified Rudolph), so
> before going into techni
Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Andy Walter wrote:
>
> > I am no graphics specialist, so I can't tell. I'll ask our AWT
> > developers about that. However, I would expect that there are
> > changes necessary in all three implementations (Rudolph,
> > Classpath, and ou
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mark> Stephen Crawley just fixed the threading issues in Kissme with
> Mark> the latest pthread library and I am now again able to run our
> Mark> TestAWT program out of the (CVS) box with Kissm
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Stephen Crawley just fixed the threading issues in Kissme with
Mark> the latest pthread library and I am now again able to run our
Mark> TestAWT program out of the (CVS) box with Kissme. (It crashes
Mark> whenever you push any of the
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 00:56, Brian Jones wrote:
> Andy, it does not seem like it will be possible to do a complete merge
> as originally hoped. Even so, it should be possible to work with you
> to include your necessary pieces that provide greater embedded
> functionality.
Yes, of course. S
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 00:01, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > [Rudolph + GNU Classpath]
>
> I meant did you try any of the awt sub-packages not found in Rudolph?
> e.g. java.awt.color, java.awt.datatransfer, java.awt.dnd, java.awt.font,
> java.awt.geom, java.awt.im, java.awt.im.spi, java.awt.image.re
Hi,
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 01:15, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mark> Stephen Crawley just fixed the threading issues in Kissme with
> Mark> the latest pthread library and I am now again able to run our
> Mark> TestAWT program out of the (CVS) bo
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> But I just tried to get this working again and it isn't that
Mark> easy if you don't know what you have to do precisely.
Fair enough.
I wrote a couple scripts that work for me. They are appended. They
are pretty bogus; the `build'
29 matches
Mail list logo
