RE: 8+3-filesystem support

2004-09-06 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Dr. Torsten Rupp wrote: > Attached to this email there is a patch. Please try it. It is > still not a nice implementation, because I still did not > removed the backslash-tests to keep it compatible with the > current implementation in Classpath. > If everybody agree it would be a nice idea to sep

Re: 8+3-filesystem support

2004-09-06 Thread Dr. Torsten Rupp
Dear Mark, Agreed. Could you supply a patch that cleans up the current code to separate the 8.3 thing and the file separator thing to explicitly mention something like fileSystem8_3 and introduces a system property that the runtime should set when such a file system is set? Attached to this email t

Re: 8+3-filesystem support

2004-09-05 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 13:42, Dr. Torsten Rupp wrote: > My request: If you make some modifications like ON_WINDOWS or isWin32 > for the filesystem code, please take into account that: > > 1) 8+3-filesystems are _not_ limited to Windows-systems. Thus it would > be better to name it fileSystem