> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Aaron
> M. Renn
>
> John Keiser wrote:
> > You can add java.beans to the list. It's done and up to 1.1
compliance,
> > as far as I have tested it. I haven't run it with the BeanBox,
though.
> > I figure if we have something wor
>
> How useful are beans without a working awt?
Actually, beans allow replacable code for building applications, not just
AWT ones, so this is probably a good thing.
Scott
John Keiser wrote:
> You can add java.beans to the list. It's done and up to 1.1 compliance,
> as far as I have tested it. I haven't run it with the BeanBox, though.
> I figure if we have something working, we may as well include it.
How useful are beans without a working awt?
> java.lang.re
Aaron M. Renn wrote:
> I thought that subject would get your attention!
> No, we aren't ready to put out our first development release yet, but
I
> would like to try to move us in that direction. Now that people on
the net
> are finding out more about our project, it is reasonable to expect
I thought that subject would get your attention!
No, we aren't ready to put out our first development release yet, but I
would like to try to move us in that direction. Now that people on the net
are finding out more about our project, it is reasonable to expect that they
will want to download
5 matches
Mail list logo
