On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 15:03 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 01:40 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
We now finally have a branch for 0.92. classpath-0_92-branch (and the
branch point is tagged as classpath-0_92-branch-point).
Paul reminded me to activate the future
Il giorno gio, 03/08/2006 alle 01.23 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
Thanks for the reminder I have checked in the following on the trunk,
release and generics branch.
2006-08-02 Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* configure.ac (gconf-peer): Check for gdk-2.0.
*
Hi Mario,
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 20:40 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
Hopefully, I can came up with something that relax this requirement...
There is already a bug report for this from the Debian gcc packager.
Feel free to assign it to yourself :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28538
Il giorno gio, 03/08/2006 alle 20.49 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
Although I am not sure there is much to do about it. We do need
gdk_threads_enter/leave () to not interfere with the gtk-peer libraries
and those functions are in the gdk-2.0 library so we will have to link
against that.
Hi Mario,
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 19:48 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno ven, 28/07/2006 alle 01.40 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
Last update to the gconf preference backend included a dependency on gtk
for gdk_hread_enter/leave, but we didn't update the configure.ac script.
there are
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 01:40 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
We now finally have a branch for 0.92. classpath-0_92-branch (and the
branch point is tagged as classpath-0_92-branch-point).
Paul reminded me to activate the future release script on builder.
For those wanting a tar.gz dist to test
Il giorno ven, 28/07/2006 alle 01.40 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
Hi,
[...]
Thanks,
Mark
Hi Mark!
Last update to the gconf preference backend included a dependency on gtk
for gdk_hread_enter/leave, but we didn't update the configure.ac script.
there are two places in which this file
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 01:40 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
We now finally have a branch for 0.92. classpath-0_92-branch (and the
branch point is tagged as classpath-0_92-branch-point). If you have any
patches that you would also want to see on the release branch please CC
me (and mention
Andrew == Andrew John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew I've synced the generics branch up to the branch point for 0.92. Just
Andrew apply any release branch patches both to generics and the release
Andrew branch.
Are you going to hold off on any other head-generics merges until
0.92
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 15:39 -0400, Tom Tromey wrote:
Andrew == Andrew John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew I've synced the generics branch up to the branch point for 0.92. Just
Andrew apply any release branch patches both to generics and the release
Andrew branch.
Are you going
Hi,
We now finally have a branch for 0.92. classpath-0_92-branch (and the
branch point is tagged as classpath-0_92-branch-point). If you have any
patches that you would also want to see on the release branch please CC
me (and mention the bug number or mauve tests that the patch fixes). If
there
11 matches
Mail list logo
