On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 15:03 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 01:40 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > We now finally have a branch for 0.92. classpath-0_92-branch (and the
> > branch point is tagged as classpath-0_92-branch-point).
>
> Paul reminded me to activate the futu
Il giorno gio, 03/08/2006 alle 20.49 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
> Although I am not sure there is much to do about it. We do need
> gdk_threads_enter/leave () to not interfere with the gtk-peer libraries
> and those functions are in the gdk-2.0 library so we will have to link
> against that.
Hi Mario,
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 20:40 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
> Hopefully, I can came up with something that relax this requirement...
There is already a bug report for this from the Debian gcc packager.
Feel free to assign it to yourself :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28538
Al
Il giorno gio, 03/08/2006 alle 01.23 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
> Thanks for the reminder I have checked in the following on the trunk,
> release and generics branch.
>
> 2006-08-02 Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * configure.ac (gconf-peer): Check for gdk-2.0.
> * native/j
Hi Mario,
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 19:48 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 28/07/2006 alle 01.40 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
>
> Last update to the gconf preference backend included a dependency on gtk
> for gdk_hread_enter/leave, but we didn't update the configure.ac script.
>
> there
Il giorno ven, 28/07/2006 alle 01.40 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
> Hi,
[...]
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
Hi Mark!
Last update to the gconf preference backend included a dependency on gtk
for gdk_hread_enter/leave, but we didn't update the configure.ac script.
there are two places in which this f
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 01:40 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> We now finally have a branch for 0.92. classpath-0_92-branch (and the
> branch point is tagged as classpath-0_92-branch-point).
Paul reminded me to activate the future release script on builder.
For those wanting a tar.gz dist to test
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 15:39 -0400, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andrew> I've synced the generics branch up to the branch point for 0.92. Just
> Andrew> apply any release branch patches both to generics and the release
> Andrew> branch.
>
> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> I've synced the generics branch up to the branch point for 0.92. Just
Andrew> apply any release branch patches both to generics and the release
Andrew> branch.
Are you going to hold off on any other head->generics merges un
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 01:40 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We now finally have a branch for 0.92. classpath-0_92-branch (and the
> branch point is tagged as classpath-0_92-branch-point). If you have any
> patches that you would also want to see on the release branch please CC
> me (and ment
Hi,
We now finally have a branch for 0.92. classpath-0_92-branch (and the
branch point is tagged as classpath-0_92-branch-point). If you have any
patches that you would also want to see on the release branch please CC
me (and mention the bug number or mauve tests that the patch fixes). If
there ar
11 matches
Mail list logo
