On Jul 31, Paul Fisher wrote:
> Jochen Hoenicke wrote:
> > As far as I can see, there is no real java.util.zip implementation in
> > classpath yet, so do you agree if I just commit the content of jazzlib
> > to the classpath repository, overwriting the three small existing
> > classes?
>
> That's
Jochen Hoenicke wrote:
> As far as I can see, there is no real java.util.zip implementation in
> classpath yet, so do you agree if I just commit the content of jazzlib
> to the classpath repository, overwriting the three small existing
> classes?
That's fine. As you commit files, could you pleas
Jochen Hoenicke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The other problem is the merge with libgcj as it already contains a
> working java.util.zip implementation based on CNI. However, the
> java.util.zip package wasn't merged yet, so there is no need to
> resolve this now.
Is Jazzlib 100% Java? If so, I
Hello,
We (John Leuner and I) have assigned copyright for jazzlib to the FSF,
so there shouldn't be any legal obstacle to including the code in
classpath anymore.
As far as I can see, there is no real java.util.zip implementation in
classpath yet, so do you agree if I just commit the content o
4 matches
Mail list logo
