Re: [Jamvm-general] More problems (Resources this time)

2008-08-18 Thread Jon Senior
>-Original Message- >I notice that you're using -Xbootclasspath/a:... This appends the >entries to the end of the default bootclasspath; it does not replace >it. The existing entries in the bootclasspath will be searched >before the appended entries. Is it possible that classes/resource

Re: [Jamvm-general] More problems (Resources this time)

2008-08-15 Thread Robert Lougher
Hi, On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Jon Senior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>-Original Message- >>Jon, I'm sorry that I can't be very helpful, but I ran into very >>similar problems. >>I think if you search for my name in the JamVM or Classpath mailing lists, >>you'll find some messages f

Re: [cp-patches] FYI: more CopyOnWriteArrayList fixlets

2007-12-11 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 21:49 +0100, Mario Torre wrote: > Il giorno lun, 26/11/2007 alle 09.29 +, Ian Rogers ha scritto: > > > I wonder if some of the other failures could be down to an old JSR 166. > > What's the protocol to update the code in the external directory? > > I think so. CopyOnWri

Re: [cp-patches] FYI: more CopyOnWriteArrayList fixlets

2007-11-27 Thread Mario Torre
Il giorno lun, 26/11/2007 alle 09.29 +, Ian Rogers ha scritto: > Looking at the current status, TimeUnitTest looks to be failing as the > version of JSR166 in the external directory is old enough not to be > declaring TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS: > > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~irogers/jsr166/produ

Re: [cp-patches] FYI: more CopyOnWriteArrayList fixlets

2007-11-26 Thread Ian Rogers
Mario Torre wrote: I'm committing this one, that fixes a couple of "woops!" I did in the last patch, as well as some other methods that were already broken (read: not my fault :) Now it should pass all the public domain tck166 tests, except for subList. Thanks, Mario This is great! The Jik

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-24 Thread Christian Thalinger
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 10:15 +0200, Martin Schlienger wrote: > Thanks to all for your contribution. We have now a version that works > and without further optimizations we can run jamvm with a local > classpath of ~ 800ko and still be able to use all the classes in GNU > Classpath by loading them fr

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-24 Thread Martin Schlienger
Thanks to all for your contribution. We have now a version that works and without further optimizations we can run jamvm with a local classpath of ~ 800ko and still be able to use all the classes in GNU Classpath by loading them from a remote http location. Indeed there were several problems havi

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Schlienger
ClassLoader, download our byte[] (as explained above) > and create a Class object out of it without calling defineClass() ? > > > > > Martin> We have done some basic tests and this seemed to work. However, when > > Martin> trying with a more complete program, it appear

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Haley
ject out of it without calling defineClass() ? > > > > > Martin> We have done some basic tests and this seemed to work. However, > > when > > Martin> trying with a more complete program, it appears that it throws > > Martin> IllegalAccessException mak

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Schlienger
ow to avoid loadClass() from ClassLoader, download our byte[] (as explained above) and create a Class object out of it without calling defineClass() ? Martin> We have done some basic tests and this seemed to work. However, when Martin> trying with a more complete program, it ap

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-04 Thread Tom Tromey
e have done some basic tests and this seemed to work. However, when Martin> trying with a more complete program, it appears that it throws Martin> IllegalAccessException making me think that some security is added Martin> when using the defineClass() on core API. For this sort of a thing more

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-02 Thread Martin Schlienger
when trying with a more complete program, it appears that it throws IllegalAccessException making me think that some security is added when using the defineClass() on core API. Normally when calling VMClassLoader.loadClass(), which is the method that should be used for bootstrap classes, defineClass(

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-05-01 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Martin" == Martin Schlienger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> - Is there any place where I can find something like a UML sequence Martin> diagram of classloading mechanisms. Nope, sorry. Martin> It seems there is a lot of back and forth between Martin> URLClassLoader, ClassLoader, VMCl

Re: Compilation Time | More questions ClassLoader

2007-04-27 Thread Martin Schlienger
Hi again, Thanks for your answers. back to ClassLoader. Two questions: - Is there any place where I can find something like a UML sequence diagram of classloading mechanisms. It seems there is a lot of back and forth between URLClassLoader, ClassLoader, VMClassLoader and all is a little bit con

Re: Compilation Time | More questions -Charsets

2007-04-26 Thread Robert Schuster
Hi, > There is no rule here as far as I know. We just register all the > charsets we have. Adding a charset is done either because it is > specified by the standard, or because someone needed it. I know I should have answered earlier. The standard charsets are chosen according to Sun's specifica

Re: Compilation Time | More questions -Charsets

2007-04-25 Thread Tom Tromey
e standard, or because someone needed it. I suppose registration could be done more lazily somehow. I haven't looked into it. Tom

Re: Compilation Time | More questions -Charsets

2007-04-25 Thread Martin Schlienger
Actually since we saw that support for different charsets were constantly added to GNU/Classpath, this may have been linked with GNU/Classpath and not jamvm. Indeed, gnu.java.nio.charset.Provider loads multiple default charsets. We modify this one as well. It seems that UTF8 , 8859_1 and US_ASCII

Re: Compilation Time | More questions -Charsets

2007-04-24 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Martin" == Martin Schlienger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Now we are investigating the charsets classes since for sure we don't Martin> need them all on our minimal system. JamVM tries to load a bunch of Martin> them when initializing and we would stick to one (8859 or UTF8 for Marti

Re: Compilation Time | More questions -Charsets

2007-04-24 Thread Martin Schlienger
ok, thanks for that, I may move to Eclipse if needed. Actually we are hacking the ClassLoader in a way we break Java Spec, so this may not be really interested for main maintainers. The idea is to split the glibj.zip: the very useful class to boot the VM (jamvm) and our custom ClassLoader are kep

[Bug cp-tools/30707] New: [regression] gjavah cannot handle more than one CLASS

2007-02-05 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
seen while building the bindings for subversion (part of the subversion source). Both gcjh and sun's javah can handle more than one CLASS for each call; the merged gjavah only writes output for the first CLASS on the command line. -- Summary: [regression] gjavah cannot handle

[Bug swing/27930] DefaultStyledDocument.insert(int, ElementSpec[]) fails with more than one member in array.

2006-10-10 Thread roman at kennke dot org
--- Comment #2 from roman at kennke dot org 2006-10-10 20:19 --- AFAICS, this is fixed in CVS HEAD. -- roman at kennke dot org changed: What|Removed |Added St

Re: Fwd: [cp-patches] More useful command-line options for XML parsers

2006-06-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Chris" == Chris Burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Chris> I know that a few people have been having problems debugging Chris> XML usage in their applications, so if you didn't know already Chris> you can invoke both the SAX and the StAX parser from the Chris> command line with e.g. Chris>

Fwd: [cp-patches] More useful command-line options for XML parsers

2006-06-07 Thread Chris Burdess
I thought this might be of general interest to Classpath users: Begin forwarded message: I committed this patch to add options to the command-line versions of the SAX and StAX XML parsers that allow you to set several configuration parameters, as well as syntax help on these options. It is

Re: Room for more block ciphers?

2006-06-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 12:24 +0200, Robert Schuster wrote: > GNU Classpath aims to be not only a replacement for the proprietary Java class > libraries but eventually wants to be technically better. In regard to your > question this means if we can provide more block ciphers out of the

Re: Room for more block ciphers?

2006-06-01 Thread Robert Schuster
Hi Morgon, GNU Classpath aims to be not only a replacement for the proprietary Java class libraries but eventually wants to be technically better. In regard to your question this means if we can provide more block ciphers out of the box than the JDK does then this is appreciated. Mark? Tom? cya

Re: Room for more block ciphers?

2006-06-01 Thread Raif S. Naffah
reviving GNU Crypto if someone wanted to > continue developing it for other purposes (that is, if you have a use > for GNU Crypto outside of Classpath's more narrow goal of completing > its JCE providers)" > > Which implies that further ciphers wouldn't be want

Room for more block ciphers?

2006-05-31 Thread Morgon Kanter
of Classpath's more narrow goal of completing its JCE providers)" Which implies that further ciphers wouldn't be wanted or needed for Classpath. So, yes, my question is: would new block ciphers be wanted in Classpath? Thanks. -- Morgon

Segfaulting (was More qt-peer issues)

2006-02-03 Thread Holger Schurig
> I can also let the qt-peer rendered Example app crash by intent: I first > start the app, then I click the "Random test" button, then the X-button of > the window to close the window and then the the "RoundRect" button. And > voula, a crash. in GDB, with "handle SIGUSR1 nostop noprint pass" in .

Re: More qt-peer issues

2006-02-03 Thread Holger Schurig
> --- > QFont: It is not safe to use text and fonts outside the gui thread > --- > > See my earlier mail, > http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/2006-Februar

Re: More qt-peer issues

2006-02-01 Thread Robert Lougher
Hi Holger, I'm not able to comment on the Qt issues, but I'll address the JamVM questions (see below). Rob. On 2/1/06, Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- > > and jamvm 1.4.2 with: > > ---

More qt-peer issues

2006-02-01 Thread Holger Schurig
Here's a broken down report on other qt-peer design issues: I compiled classpath from CVS with: --- $ MOC=/usr/bin/moc-qt4 \ ECJ=/usr/bin/ecj-gcj \ ./configure \ --prefix=`pwd`/dist \ --enable-xmlj \ --enable

Re: Swing (more screenshots)

2005-10-09 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
ftware replacements for those APIs. > We're considering to add someone to classpath evaluation, testing > and maybe codding, for helping to finish those parts we need to run over > a free VM, and in two or three months we'll need some advice about > what's more neede

Re: Swing (more screenshots)

2005-10-09 Thread Luis W. Sevilla
l swing and full JNI for running. We're considering to add someone to classpath evaluation, testing and maybe codding, for helping to finish those parts we need to run over a free VM, and in two or three months we'll need some advice about what's more needed and the path to di

Re: Swing (more screenshots)

2005-10-08 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Joao, On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 23:11 -0300, Joao Victor wrote: > With all those cool screenshots, i had to try it myself here's > some screenshots of Weka (a data mining app) running on Classpath: > > http://img130.imageshack.us/my.php?image=classpathweka15ym.png > http://img130.imageshack.us

Re: Swing (more screenshots)

2005-10-07 Thread Joao Victor
With all those cool screenshots, i had to try it myself here's some screenshots of Weka (a data mining app) running on Classpath: http://img130.imageshack.us/my.php?image=classpathweka15ym.png http://img130.imageshack.us/my.php?image=classpathweka29ye.png http://img130.imageshack.us/my.php?ima

Re: Swing (more screenshots)

2005-10-07 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
our development efforts and make fixing problems much easier. [...] > (1) fix JScrollPane and JViewport > (2) make JTextField and JTextArea more robust > (3) implement the missing bits of Graphics2D (fix segfaults) Yes, Graphics2D is in terrible shape. I'm currently working on

Re: Swing (more screenshots)

2005-10-07 Thread David Gilbert
Hi Norman, Norman Hendrich wrote: Perhaps submitting bug reports with testcases made all the difference? Your bug reports are really excellent! Sorted by relevance, my personal wishlist looks like this: (1) fix JScrollPane and JViewport (2) make JTextField and JTextArea more robust (3

Swing (more screenshots)

2005-10-07 Thread Norman Hendrich
orted by relevance, my personal wishlist looks like this: (1) fix JScrollPane and JViewport (2) make JTextField and JTextArea more robust (3) implement the missing bits of Graphics2D (fix segfaults) (4) fix JFileChooser (and make it look pretty) As most 'complex' Swing components lik

[Bug classpath/23952] New: java.util.ResourceBundle should use a more sophisticated cache mechanism

2005-09-18 Thread ray at shoudonet dot no-ip dot org
getBundle() to disable the caching, I confirmed that there was no increase in the heap size [2]. However, it increased the start-up time of Tomcat by 30 sec; 70 sec when using the cache, while 100 sec when not using the cache. Overall, the best solution would be to use more sophisticated cache which can

Re: [japitools] more generic evilness - is this legal?

2005-09-12 Thread Stuart Ballard
On 9/12/05, David Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raw types make things very messy. I think your are confusing the nesting > aspects and the inheriting aspects of types. You're not kidding that they're messy ;) I don't think I was exactly confusing the nesting and inheriting aspects, just mis

RE: [japitools] more generic evilness - is this legal?

2005-09-12 Thread David Holmes
Stuart, > class Outer { > class Inner { > } > class InnerTester extends Inner { > } > public InnerTester getIt() { return new InnerTester(); } > } Okay. InnerTester is a non-generic class that extends the raw type Inner. > public class Tester2 { > public static Outer.InnerTester getI

[japitools] more generic evilness - is this legal?

2005-09-12 Thread Stuart Ballard
I hope people don't mind me using this list for japitools discussion - I think it's relevant to Claspath as the primary consumer of the results... Anyway, I found another evil case that javac accepts and I'm wondering if any of the experts on the JLS can tell me whether this is *supposed* to be ac

Re: Article about Dynamic Java and more

2004-12-09 Thread theUser BL
> Hi. For all people, who don't read monologue, here an interesting article > about Dynamic Java: > > http://www.go-mono.com/monologue/ > http://usefulinc.com/edd/blog/contents/2004/12/09-jvm/read > http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/12/08/DynamicJava Rather than just posting rando

Re: Article about Dynamic Java and more

2004-12-09 Thread Andrew Haley
theUser BL writes: > Hi. For all people, who don't read monologue, here an interesting article > about Dynamic Java: > > http://www.go-mono.com/monologue/ > http://usefulinc.com/edd/blog/contents/2004/12/09-jvm/read > http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/12/08/DynamicJava Rather tha

Article about Dynamic Java and more

2004-12-09 Thread theUser BL
Hi. For all people, who don't read monologue, here an interesting article about Dynamic Java: http://www.go-mono.com/monologue/ http://usefulinc.com/edd/blog/contents/2004/12/09-jvm/read http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/12/08/DynamicJava Greatings theuserbl ___

More japitools status

2004-10-28 Thread Stuart Ballard
Stuart Ballard wrote: For now, if people here don't object, I'll post occasional status reports on the Classpath list which would otherwise have gone to a japitools list. Please do let me know if you'd prefer me not to post this stuff here. I'm still working on false-positive elimination from the

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-08 Thread Andrew Haley
Sven de Marothy writes: > On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 18:01, Per Bothner wrote: > > That other issue is that system strtod may not be accurate. > > Note that parseDouble is required to return the *closest* > > double. This is a difficult requirement to meet, and cannot be done > > by simple (i.e. t

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Chris Pickett
the glibc case. If on non-glibc platforms floating-point conversion isn't quite as exact as the spec requires, fixing that is not a priority. Of course if somebody wants to work on a more portable solution, that is great, as lang as it doesn't penalize the glibc case. Semi-agreed.. I ju

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Archie Cobbs
bviously not Linux-specific. > Classpath is the *GNU* Java library, so it isn't unreasonable to > optimize for the glibc case. If on non-glibc platforms floating-point > conversion isn't quite as exact as the spec requires, fixing that is > not a priority. Of course if somebod

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Per Bothner
ze for the glibc case. If on non-glibc platforms floating-point conversion isn't quite as exact as the spec requires, fixing that is not a priority. Of course if somebody wants to work on a more portable solution, that is great, as lang as it doesn't penalize the glibc case. --

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Archie Cobbs
Sven de Marothy wrote: > > If the strtod in glibc is threadsafe *and* accurate, then we should > > probably use it, at least as a default. > > Dalibor Topic said on IRC that it has some problems on Irix. So it might > not be a good idea. So perhaps adding a special case would be best, or > you cou

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Sven de Marothy
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 18:01, Per Bothner wrote: > That other issue is that system strtod may not be accurate. > Note that parseDouble is required to return the *closest* > double. This is a difficult requirement to meet, and cannot be done > by simple (i.e. traditional) implementations. Which is

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Chris Gray
On Thursday 07 October 2004 09:43, Jeroen Frijters wrote: > Casey Marshall wrote: > > Robert> After spending some time on ideas to fix this the following > > Robert> came to my mind: > > Robert> a) do the NaN,Infinity in Java and the rest in C > > Robert> b) do both in C because its faster > > Robe

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Casey Marshall
h a toolkit-independent mechanism, Stuart> which could then be implemented as Swing calls. Plus I'm Stuart> pretty sure the upcoming release supports WYSIWYG editing... Stuart> (Sure, any of these are likely to be far more powerful and Stuart> conformant than Sun's implem

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Per Bothner
Sven de Marothy wrote: Actually.. That's where the bug was! :-) strtod (by ANSI C99) should handle Infinity and NaN. The problem is the #ifdef on lines 268-273: #ifdef KISSME_LINUX_USER val = strtod (p, &endptr); #else val = _strtod_r (&reent, p, &endptr); #endif The former calls the standard l

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Robert Schuster
Hi the mailer is funny. I got Sven's response to Andrew's mail but not Andrew's. Sven de Marothy wrote: Andrew Haley writes: Has anyone seen that one: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=10491 I recently discovered it while writing some test files for the

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Sven de Marothy
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 16:05, Andrew Haley wrote: > Yes. Also, the fdlibm code we use at the moment is of high quality. > It seems anything we write afresh will be more buggy, at least to > start with. Actually.. That's where the bug was! :-) strtod (by ANSI C99) should handle In

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Andrew Haley
("NaN")); I see. > Although, personally.. I'm not so sure of re-writing it in Java. Seems > like overkill for a relatively trivial bug. Yes. Also, the fdlibm code we use at the moment is of high quality. It seems anything we write afresh will be more buggy, at least to st

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Sven de Marothy
Andrew Haley writes: >> Has anyone seen that one: >> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=10491 >> I recently discovered it while writing some test files for the >> XMLDecoder I am working on. In an attempt to find the reason I followed >> to the C source that does the conversio

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Stuart Ballard
e the most promising because AIUI they replaced all the Qt dependencies with a toolkit-independent mechanism, which could then be implemented as Swing calls. Plus I'm pretty sure the upcoming release supports WYSIWYG editing... (Sure, any of these are likely to be far more powerful and confor

bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Andrew Haley
Robert Schuster writes: > Hi > > > > > I've done the same comparison 6 weeks ago with Tom Tromey, and we > > were at 75% back then. > > > > 5 % in 6 weeks. 20 % to go. You do the math. :) > > I am excited too but on the other hand I worry about a lot bugs popping > up ... > > Has

RE: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-07 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Casey Marshall wrote: > Robert> After spending some time on ideas to fix this the following > Robert> came to my mind: > Robert> a) do the NaN,Infinity in Java and the rest in C > Robert> b) do both in C because its faster > Robert> c) provide a pure Java and a pure C version, making > Robert> JNod

Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-06 Thread Casey Marshall
That might turn out to be the longest 6 months ever, since Classpath is still missing the badly-written web browser and HTML WYSIWYG composer (javax.swing.text.html) :) Robert> I am excited too but on the other hand I worry about a lot Robert> bugs popping up ... I don't worry that

bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-06 Thread Robert Schuster
Hi I've done the same comparison 6 weeks ago with Tom Tromey, and we were at 75% back then. 5 % in 6 weeks. 20 % to go. You do the math. :) I am excited too but on the other hand I worry about a lot bugs popping up ... Has anyone seen that one: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&it

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-06 Thread Dalibor Topic
Stuart Ballard wrote: Dalibor Topic wrote: Kaffe's japi files appear to be from August 18th and again built with the old version[2]. I guess those aren't automatically built? Nope, built by me by hand, ocassionally, when I can't hide from the demand :) Like right now ;) I've put up a kaffe.japi

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-05 Thread Michael Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2004 20:53 schrieb Stuart Ballard: > Tom Tromey wrote: > > Michael tells me that jikes output confuses japi. So pending the > > gcj fix there won't be updates... > > Do you have a released version of gcj installed as well as th

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-05 Thread Stuart Ballard
Tom Tromey wrote: Michael tells me that jikes output confuses japi. So pending the gcj fix there won't be updates... Do you have a released version of gcj installed as well as the autobuilt cvs version that you could use to produce the Classpath japi? -- Stuart Ballard, Senior Web Developer NetR

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-05 Thread Tom Tromey
Stuart> Classpath's japi files, btw, are a month out of date, don't include Stuart> CORBA, XML or Tritonus, and were built with the old version[2] - I Stuart> understand that Tom is working on some classpath build issues. It wasn't building for a long time due to a local problem. Then last night's

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-05 Thread Michael Koch
rstand that Tom is working on some classpath build issues. > > I'm really interested to see what its total score is once these > issues are resolved: in areas that *are* included, classpath is > more consistently green than libgcj is - it might even hit 80%. I get 70.7% currently aga

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-05 Thread Stuart Ballard
a month out of date, don't include CORBA, XML or Tritonus, and were built with the old version[2] - I understand that Tom is working on some classpath build issues. I'm really interested to see what its total score is once these issues are resolved: in areas that *are* included, c

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-05 Thread Michael Koch
> > Unfortunately, I don't think we can use GPL code, since > > > Classpath's license is GPL + exception, which is a more > > > permissable license. (I.e. you can go GPL+exception-->GPL but > > > not in the other direction.) > > > > I could

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-05 Thread Sven de Marothy
t; > > >>JIU - The Java Imaging Utilities - > >>http://jiu.sourceforge.net/status.html - GPL > > > > > > Unfortunately, I don't think we can use GPL code, since Classpath's > > license is GPL + exception, which is a more permissable license.

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-05 Thread Dalibor Topic
e can use GPL code, since Classpath's license is GPL + exception, which is a more permissable license. (I.e. you can go GPL+exception-->GPL but not in the other direction.) I could ask him if he'd like to contribute his code to GNU Classpath. GPL is OK for staging it in Kaffe un

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-02 Thread Sven de Marothy
can use GPL code, since Classpath's license is GPL + exception, which is a more permissable license. (I.e. you can go GPL+exception-->GPL but not in the other direction.) But.. on the positive side, there are rumors that Michael Koch has finished the imageio framework (but not the plugins).

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-02 Thread James Damour
On Thu, 2004-10-01 at 10:55, Stuart Ballard wrote: > This is all that's necessary for *complete 1.4 API coverage at 80% or > better for every single package*. > > It doesn't seem like long ago that it seemed that even reaching 1.2 > compatibility was so far away that it was practically unachievab

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-01 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Stuart" == Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stuart> How did you manage to get JacORB to build? I cheated and downloaded it prebuilt. Stuart> Nice - lack of providers of course hurts the real-life Stuart> usefulness, but doesn't hurt the japi scores in the slightest Stuart> ;) P

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-01 Thread Robert Schuster
Stuart> - Imageio Michael Koch has the library parts of this, just not checked in yet. My understanding is that he doesn't have any providers. javax.imageio support would be great. I searched for Java libraries with friendly licenses and this one seemed to be very interesting: JIU - The Java

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-01 Thread Stuart Ballard
Tom Tromey wrote: Yeah. I just changed my nightly script to include Xalan and JacORB in the results for libgcj. I didn't include Tritonus since I didn't want to figure out how to build it today, and there isn't a prebuilt .jar including the javax.sound bits. Awesome :) How did you manage to get J

Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-01 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Stuart" == Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stuart> It seems to be established that Sound and XML are both just a matter Stuart> of dropping in some third-party code. And CORBA too, except in that Stuart> case we know some work needs to be done to make the third-party code Stuart>

More astonishing progress in japi scores

2004-10-01 Thread Stuart Ballard
situation only even more so - the only holes are auth.kerberos and auth.spi. It seems to be established that Sound and XML are both just a matter of dropping in some third-party code. And CORBA too, except in that case we know some work needs to be done to make the third-party code compile o

RE: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-03 Thread Regier Avery J
a.net/ Avery Regier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dalibor Topic Sent: Fri 7/2/2004 7:41 AM To: Arnaud Vandyck Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Andrew Joh

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-03 Thread Andrew John Hughes
~jfreed/ but it > >>doesn't seem toexist any more. Fortunately, archive.org has saved a copy > >>of the page on > >>http://web.archive.org/web/20001012122624/http://members.linuxstart.com/~jfreed/ > >> > >>Jean-Christophe Taveau has been last se

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-03 Thread Dalibor Topic
Andrew John Hughes wrote: On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 15:19, Dalibor Topic wrote: According to the page above, there was once a free implementation of java3d available at http://members.linuxstart.com/~jfreed/ but it doesn't seem toexist any more. Fortunately, archive.org has saved a copy of the

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-03 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 16:26, Artur Biesiadowski wrote: > As for the 'free' implementation of java3d, xith3d is probably a good > place to start. It has most of java3d features implemented already, at > least as far as desktop targets are concerned. For the vecmath, Kenji's > version can be used

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-03 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 15:19, Dalibor Topic wrote: > According to the page above, there was once a free implementation of > java3d available at http://members.linuxstart.com/~jfreed/ but it > doesn't seem toexist any more. Fortunately, archive.org has saved a copy > of th

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-03 Thread Artur Biesiadowski
Dalibor Topic wrote: Regarding legal things, java3d seems to be covered by some patents. See http://www.3dcompression.com/patents.phtml for details. I have no idea how important 3d compression is for Java3d, but since you asked ;) It is not important. While you won't be able to build full implem

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-03 Thread Dalibor Topic
source, unfortunately. Sun's marketing gave the wrong impression there, they forgot to mention that core parts of Sun's implementation of Java3d remain non-free. :) But it is certainly sweet that they released more code under open source licenses. cheers, dalibor topic _

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-03 Thread Dalibor Topic
te Free Software implementations of these libraries? Having these would mean that Project Looking Glass would be more likely to run on a Free platform. At present, it is tied to proprietary Sun licenses, even if the main code is under the GPL. I'm not sure but maybe some developpers on clas

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-02 Thread Andrew John Hughes
I was wondering > >>if anyone knew about the possibility or the existence of an effort to > >>create Free Software implementations of these libraries? Having these > >>would mean that Project Looking Glass would be more likely to run on a > >>Free platform. At present

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
ean that Project Looking Glass would be more likely to run on a Free platform. At present, it is tied to proprietary Sun licenses, even if the main code is under the GPL. I'm not sure but maybe some developpers on classpath project already work on this. There is a free vecmath implementation, B

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-02 Thread Andrew John Hughes
bility or the existence of an effort to > > create Free Software implementations of these libraries? Having these > > would mean that Project Looking Glass would be more likely to run on a > > Free platform. At present, it is tied to proprietary Sun licenses, even > > if the main code is

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] More Java Extensions

2004-07-02 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
these > would mean that Project Looking Glass would be more likely to run on a > Free platform. At present, it is tied to proprietary Sun licenses, even > if the main code is under the GPL. I'm not sure but maybe some developpers on class

Re: Patch: FYI: More efficient ResourceBundle calls

2004-06-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Ni Bryce, Bryce McKinlay wrote: Dalibor Topic wrote: Ah, the curse of getting microoptimizations right ;) I don't really consider this to be a micro-optimization. In libgcj it causes pretty severe performance problems. You could argue that this is because libgcj's calling-classloader check is t

Re: Patch: FYI: More efficient ResourceBundle calls

2004-06-16 Thread Archie Cobbs
Bryce McKinlay wrote: > Hmm - but can this ever happen? Is it possible to define a core class > with a non-system class loader? In any case, it seems to me that it > should always be correct to load Locale resources etc with the system > class loader - or is there a situation I havn't considered

Re: Patch: FYI: More efficient ResourceBundle calls

2004-06-16 Thread Andrew Haley
gt; > I don't really consider this to be a micro-optimization. In libgcj > it causes pretty severe performance problems. You could argue that > this is because libgcj's calling-classloader check is too slow, and > you'd be right, but I would imagine that in most VMs,

Re: Patch: FYI: More efficient ResourceBundle calls

2004-06-16 Thread Bryce McKinlay
Dalibor Topic wrote: I think the solution here is to pass the system class loader. This should always be correct for these bootstrap classes. It doesn't solve the performance issues for cases where a security manager is present, since a check will be performed by the getSystemClassLoader call -

Re: Patch: FYI: More efficient ResourceBundle calls

2004-06-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Bryce McKinlay wrote: Mark Wielaard wrote: On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 16:56, Bryce McKinlay wrote: I'm checking in this patch from libgcj. It changes various ResourceBundle.getBundle() calls to use the 3-argument form which includes a ClassLoader parameter. This call is more efficient becau

Re: Patch: FYI: More efficient ResourceBundle calls

2004-06-15 Thread Bryce McKinlay
Mark Wielaard wrote: On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 16:56, Bryce McKinlay wrote: I'm checking in this patch from libgcj. It changes various ResourceBundle.getBundle() calls to use the 3-argument form which includes a ClassLoader parameter. This call is more efficient because it means getBundle()

Re: Patch: FYI: More efficient ResourceBundle calls

2004-06-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 16:56, Bryce McKinlay wrote: > I'm checking in this patch from libgcj. It changes various > ResourceBundle.getBundle() calls to use the 3-argument form which > includes a ClassLoader parameter. This call is more efficient because > it means getBundle()

Patch: FYI: More efficient ResourceBundle calls

2004-06-15 Thread Bryce McKinlay
Hi all. I'm checking in this patch from libgcj. It changes various ResourceBundle.getBundle() calls to use the 3-argument form which includes a ClassLoader parameter. This call is more efficient because it means getBundle() does not have to walk the stack to find the calling classloader.

  1   2   3   >