"John Keiser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frankly, there are only going to be a few major contributors whose toolkits
are going to be *extremely* widely used, and GNU is probably one of them.
Making it easy to type and use and think about (less mental friction) is a
good thing.
Although not
's ugly. I truly do not
know what "most people" think.
--John Keiser
-Original Message-
From: Thomas J Lukasik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 1999 9:19 PM
To: John Keiser; Classpat 2
Subject: Re: org.gnu vs. gnu (was Re: Congratulations)
Hey, I've got a great solution. We start a "gnu" TLD to go along with "com",
"org", etc. Problem solved, everyone's happy, we all find more constructive
things to debate and/or get on with writing code.
Wes
Wow. This is the most discussion we've had on any topic in a long time
around here. This is the most ridiculous thing to have a flame war about
ever. So I'll pledge to stop right here. Everyone else can send
one more message if they want to.
The vast bulk of what we are writing is in the
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 11:13:37PM -0700, John Keiser wrote:
OK, here it is in writing: I am absolutely serious, "org.gnu" takes more
energy than "gnu". But it's not about typing energy, it's about thinking
energy, the minimization of which is (IMO) one of the principal factors in
designing
Thomas J Lukasik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Classpath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, September 13, 1999 1:19 AM
Subject: RE: org.gnu vs. gnu (was Re: Congratulations)
OK, here it is in writing: I am absolutely serious, "org.gnu" takes more
energy than "gnu". But it's not ab
someone **begs** me to come out of
retirement =8j)
TJL
-Original Message-
From: Wes Biggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Keiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Thomas J Lukasik [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Classpath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, September 13, 1999 2:10 AM
Subject: Re: org.gnu vs. gnu (was Re: Co
"Aaron M. Renn" wrote:
I'm opposed to org.gnu for the same reason that I hate email addresses
of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] It purports to be some type of
globally unique identifier when in fact it is not. In the meantime,
it requires names that are extremely verbose. At my last company
: org.gnu vs. gnu (was Re: Congratulations)
"Aaron M. Renn" wrote:
I'm opposed to org.gnu for the same reason that I hate email addresses
of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] It purports to be some type of
globally unique identifier when in fact it is not. In the meantime,
it requ
9 matches
Mail list logo
