[cp-patches] [generics] Patch: FYI: genericization fixes

2006-01-15 Thread Tom Tromey
I'm checking this in on the generics branch. After the recent merge to the branch, we needed a couple minor genericization fixes. Tom 2006-01-14 Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * javax/swing/text/html/HTMLDocument.java (parseBuffer): Genericized. * javax/swing/text/StyleContext

Re: [cp-patches] [generics] FYI: New Instrumentation parameter to VMInstrumentationImpl.redefineClasses

2006-01-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Nicolas, On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 13:58 +0100, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > OK, I thought the generics branch was the equivalent of the 1.5 branch > of sun. But if it's not the case, I have no problem commiting > instrumentation code to HEAD. I do have one question though : the (sun) > API of inst

Re: [cp-patches] patch (revised) for PR25202

2006-01-15 Thread Casey Marshall
On Jan 15, 2006, at 12:36 AM, Raif S. Naffah wrote: hello there, this is a revised version of the previous patch. the differences are: * Configuration: removed documentation. * GnuConfiguration: (processSecurityProperties) surrounded code in try/catch * `ConfigFileParser: fixed the top commen

[cp-patches] FYI: Render null as the empty cell in JTable

2006-01-15 Thread Meskauskas Audrius
If the JTable model returns null, our recent implementation does not set the value at all. The visible content of such cell replicates the value of the adjacent cell. Sun's implementation renders the null value as the empty cell. With one user application I have observed the strange content repl

Re: [cp-patches] [FYI]: Patch for javax.print.attribute.standard package

2006-01-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Wolfgang, On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 23:44 +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > > It took me a while to realize what was going on here. I think a comment > > is in place (and how do you guarantee that all the other inner classes > > are registered? Like MediaSize.ISO.A4 for example.). > > All the static i

Re: [cp-patches] [generics] RFC: Genericize return type in PrinterStateReasons

2006-01-15 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Hi, Andrew John Hughes wrote: On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 11:54 +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: The patch looks fine to me; I think I already did some similiar edits on this particular file when merging, so please make sure your patch is against the latest version before committing. Done. Generally

Re: [cp-patches] [generics] RFC: Genericize return type in PrinterStateReasons

2006-01-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> Generally, I think these kind of edits are okay, but I'd save the Andrew> majority of it, where possible, to after the generics branch is Andrew> re-merged. Generally speaking, outside of java.util I've been pretty much doin

Re: [cp-patches] [generics] FYI: New Instrumentation parameter to VMInstrumentationImpl.redefineClasses

2006-01-15 Thread Nicolas Geoffray
Andrew John Hughes wrote: Instrumentation is a 1.5 package feature. It's not part of the 1.4 specification. That's why the files are only in the branch. Nicolas But the branch isn't for 1.5 features as such. It's for stuff that will only compile when used with a compiler supporting t

Re: [cp-patches] [generics] FYI: New Instrumentation parameter to VMInstrumentationImpl.redefineClasses

2006-01-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> At least, that was my understanding of this and why it's Andrew> called a generics branch and not a 1.5 branch -- someone Andrew> correct me if I'm wrong. Yeah. It kinda started as an "all things 1.5" branch but quickly bec

[cp-patches] patch (revised) for PR25202

2006-01-15 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello there, this is a revised version of the previous patch. the differences are: * Configuration: removed documentation. * GnuConfiguration: (processSecurityProperties) surrounded code in try/catch * `ConfigFileParser: fixed the top comment line. i could not get logging happening so i kept t