Re: [Project Clearwater] How does Clearwater decide if the session case is originating or terminating?

2018-02-19 Thread Anthony Lee
I need to correct my last email: The expected path should be: UeA->pCscf->sCscf->originAs->sCscf->termAs->pCscf->UeB. Now as the invite forwarded by sCscf always contains route header which points back to sCscf so the termAs keep send it back to it and becomes a loop. I guess termAs need to send

Re: [Project Clearwater] How does Clearwater decide if the session case is originating or terminating?

2018-02-19 Thread Anthony Lee
Thanks, Richard. I just extracted the ServiceRoute header from the response of Register and use it as Route of Invite. Another question: My Application has two roles: Originating and Terminating, I set up the same service triggers(Originating, Term_Registered) for UeA and UeB; The expected path

Re: [Project Clearwater] How does Clearwater decide if the session case is originating or terminating?

2018-02-19 Thread Richard Whitehouse (projectclearwater.org)
Anthony, No, it’s not the originating dialog identifier, or at least not solely the ODI token. This can’t be used, as the ODI is only added by the S-CSCF when the call is sent to an application server. TS 24.229 is the correct spec to use here – see section 5.4.3.1, and it identifies three

Re: [Project Clearwater] Unable to locate package

2018-02-19 Thread Richard Whitehouse
Pushpendra, I assume you are following the instructions on Read the Docs and have configured the APT software source as shown under http://clearwater.readthedocs.io/en/stable/Manual_Install.html#configure-the-apt-software-sources ? Can you double check that you’ve added “deb

Re: [Project Clearwater] How does Clearwater decide if the session case is originating or terminating?

2018-02-19 Thread Anthony Lee
Please forget my testcase, it turns out that I put SessionCase as 1 in SPT for term_registered while it should be 2. But it would be great if someone could answer the question in the title. >From the 3gpp technical spec I read it seems like its is the original dialog identifier that s-cscf