Hi,
Is there anyone also try to integrate Clearwater with OpenIMS HSS?
I found it difficult to use web interface to setup a service profile for a
subscribe.
Is there guide I could follow? Is there any example?
Thanks
Anthony
___
Clearwater mailing
ng the HSS up and running!
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Clearwater [mailto:clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Anthony Lee
> *Sent:* 22 March 2018 21:20
> *To:* clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
> *Subject:*
Hi,
I tried to integrate clearwater all-in-one with OpenIMS FHoSS hss,
I installed FHoSS in the same VM.
I have below settings in /etc/clearwater/shared_config:
hss_hostname=cw-aio
hss_port=3868
and then I run "sudo reboot"
I run "sudo netstat -tulpn | grep 3868" and the output shows that
the
, which will be resolved as
> per RFC 3261, with the relevant DNS queries if it represents a domain, or
> just routed if it’s an IP address.
>
> I hope this helps and points you into the right direction?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*
t us know how it goes,
>
> Ben
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Clearwater [mailto:clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Anthony Lee
> *Sent:* 10 March 2018 20:02
> *To:* clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Project Clearwater] Does Clear
en27b7lqvh3noa3nt8nftc@list-service.
example.com not present in column_family impu
Looks like Homestead uses P-Profile-Key's value to search in cache but uses
R-URI to search in database.
Is it expected behavior?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Anthony Lee <anthonyn...@gmail.com> wro
Sorry, forgot to mention that Sprout's log shows that 404 not found for
that wildcard PSI return from Homestead. .
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Lee <anthonyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My wildcard PSI is sip:.+@list-service.example.com
>
>
> I foun
I need to provision wildcarded PSI, does clearwater support to do that?
If yes, could you provide an example?
Thanks
Anthony
___
Clearwater mailing list
Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
r.org
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> clearwater-requ...@lists.projectclearwater.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> clearwater-ow...@lists.projectclearwater.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so
arwater at any point after we’ve sent it the
> request, we may need to keep that state around for an arbitrarily long
> period of time, which isn’t tenable.
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> *From:* Clearwater [mailto:clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.or
In my case, there is a application service in terminating side doing
message Store-And-Forward.
So when the service receives an Invite it replies 200OK response
immiediately and then it create a new Invite to the user.
Since scscf invalidated the AS chain when it receives 200OK response the
s termAs need to send invite to configured iCscf which would know
which pCscf to use.
Am I right?
Am I right
On Feb 19, 2018 17:59, "Anthony Lee" <anthonyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Richard.
> I just extracted the ServiceRoute header from the response of Register a
t;
>
>
> For Clearwater, the Service-Route header that Clearwater responds to
> messages contains an “orig” parameter. As such Clearwater essentially uses
> whether the request contains the orig parameter.
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> *From:* Clearwater [mailto:clearwater-boun.
scf placed that let the s-cscf determined what's
the session case.
Am I right?
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Anthony Lee <anthonyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a test that sends a request from user a to user b, a and b both
> have a iFC that point to a application server, for differe
I have a test that sends a request from user a to user b, a and b both have
a iFC that point to a application server, for different session case a
different server parameter is used.
Now from the sprout log I see that for the request sent from a it ask for
b's profile and the session case is term
I defined my application server's IP address in IFC for specific user in
Clearwater.
The application server is running in a Docker container.
The IP address in IFC is something like "192.168.43.94".
The internal IP address of the Docker container is "172.17.0.2".
>From the wireshark Clearwater
trustboundary.cpp line 48
if (cdf_domain != ""){
// really add P-Charging headers
}
Looks like my clearwater all-in-one vm need to setup CTF.
Anyidea about how to set it up in All-In-One?
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Anthony Lee <anthonyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fr
stred network so that the
P-Charging-Vector header is removed?
Also, there is log saying that "trustboundary.cpp: add P-Charging headers".
But there is no P-Charging-Vector in the outgoing message
from 5058 to sprout 5054.
Any idea?
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Anthony Lee <an
18 matches
Mail list logo
