Much to my surprise, I apparently have a board report due yesterday
for this Wednesday's board meeting. Do we have any ASF issues that
need reporting to the board, aside from what is in STATUS*?
Any choice commentary? Does anyone else feel like we have too many
dev lists for one project?
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we have any ASF issues that need reporting to the board,
Nothing new to report wrt apreq.
--
Joe Schaefer
I'm new to this
group, but have been using mod_aspdotnet for 5 months.
Does anyone know if
the next release of mod_aspdotnet will include a fix for bug #33880? This is the
one where mod_aspdotnet doesn't pass on URIs for non-existent
files.
Another one I would
be interested to know about
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ping(!) Would appreciate if anyone would try testing this release and
replying on-list if virtual, files in fact really are working. If not
I'll pull down the snapshot, if so I'll move forward on 'AspNet error'
to bypass Apache ErrorDocument handling.
William A.
Rob Hughes wrote:
I'm new to this group, but have been using mod_aspdotnet for 5 months.
Does anyone know if the next release of mod_aspdotnet will include a fix
for bug #33880? This is the one where mod_aspdotnet doesn't pass on URIs
for non-existent files.
Well, the fix is in the current
On the mod_python side we got a 3.2.2 beta out and will try to get 3.2.?
final done before Apachecon (hopefully). The last release (not counting
security fix ones) was 20 months ago, so this is pretty significant.
Grisha
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Much to my surprise, I
I'm finally broken free from production concerns to test the latest
version. I'm chasing an issue in our application concerning the
detection of SSL connections and the setting of the SERVER_PORT_SECURE
variable. Currently our application is not detecting SSL
(SERVER_PORT_SECURE set to a 0
