On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:30:21 GMT, Eric Caspole wrote:
> Build J2DBench in ant using JAVA_HOME, not using fork to possibly pick a
> different javac from the PATH.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7282f68c
Author: Eric Caspole
URL:
https://git.openjdk.o
> Build J2DBench in ant using JAVA_HOME, not using fork to possibly pick a
> different javac from the PATH.
Eric Caspole has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update the version default to 8 in the Make file as Phil n
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 00:59:01 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>> I think we can just drop ant and leave the makefile as it is. The
>>> source/target settings are set to that low level to indicate that the
>>> source code should be compatible with older versions of the JDK. Currently,
>>> JDK 1.4 co
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 19:30:40 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Build J2DBench in ant using JAVA_HOME, not using fork to possibly pick a
>> different javac from the PATH.
>
> src/demo/share/java2d/J2DBench/build.xml line 42:
>
>> 40:
>> 41:
>> 42:
>
> This would be inconsistent with the Make targe
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:38:35 GMT, Eric Caspole wrote:
> As mentioned in the bug, I think it would be better to always emit the score
> as decimal instead of sometimes decimal, sometimes scientific notation.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: dcc7254a
Author: Eric C
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:30:21 GMT, Eric Caspole wrote:
> Build J2DBench in ant using JAVA_HOME, not using fork to possibly pick a
> different javac from the PATH.
Could we move J2DBench under test next to micro/ ? It's not a demo, it's a
benchmark but somehow it ended up under
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:30:21 GMT, Eric Caspole wrote:
> Build J2DBench in ant using JAVA_HOME, not using fork to possibly pick a
> different javac from the PATH.
I dont know the history of J2DBench or how its build was developed. It looks
like J2DBench is not included in the JDK demos
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:30:21 GMT, Eric Caspole wrote:
> Build J2DBench in ant using JAVA_HOME, not using fork to possibly pick a
> different javac from the PATH.
We only test back to 8 so we don't need to change it more often. But JDK 24/25
does not support source 7 so we should d
> As mentioned in the bug, I think it would be better to always emit the score
> as decimal instead of sometimes decimal, sometimes scientific notation.
Eric Caspole has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Use - to left-align the
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 16:10:10 GMT, Jonas Norlinder wrote:
>> I am not sure what you mean, but with the 10, the scores line up with the
>> rest of the minor stats when it is monospace font like this example -
>>
>>
>> Summary:
>> vimg_text_noaa:
>> Number of tests: 2
>> Overall averag
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 20:52:50 GMT, Jonas Norlinder wrote:
>> As mentioned in the bug, I think it would be better to always emit the score
>> as decimal instead of sometimes decimal, sometimes scientific notation.
>
> src/demo/share/java2d/J2DBench/src/j2dbench/report/J2DAnalyzer.java line 273:
>
Build J2DBench in ant using JAVA_HOME, not using fork to possibly pick a
different javac from the PATH.
-
Commit messages:
- 8361216: Do not fork javac in J2DBench ant build
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26077/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=260
As mentioned in the bug, I think it would be better to always emit the score as
decimal instead of sometimes decimal, sometimes scientific notation.
-
Commit messages:
- 8361213: J2DAnalyzer should emit the score as a decimal
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26076/files
13 matches
Mail list logo
