On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:16:30 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This is somewhat a continuation for
> [JDK-8307160](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307160) and
> [JDK-8334509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334509).
>
> The former removed the `doIt` flag in #18584, but it introduced a
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:16:30 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This is somewhat a continuation for
> [JDK-8307160](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307160) and
> [JDK-8334509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334509).
>
> The former removed the `doIt` flag in #18584, but it introduced a
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:15:19 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> It would be helpful if JNI had a jobject unique_ptr type for C++
But `std::unique_ptr` wasn't available when JNI had been conceived…
It could be added…
The declaration in your sample still looks cumbersome… or _unwieldy_ as you
said.
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:16:30 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This is somewhat a continuation for
> [JDK-8307160](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307160) and
> [JDK-8334509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334509).
>
> The former removed the `doIt` flag in #18584, but it introduced a
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:54:55 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> > …I believe I was referring to the use of C++'s std::unique_ptr, which has
> > the functionality for cleanup that we need.
>
> Yes, `std::unique_ptr` could be useful for handling automatic deallocation of
> objects created with the
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:26:24 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> …I believe I was referring to the use of C++'s std::unique_ptr, which has the
> functionality for cleanup that we need.
Yes, `std::unique_ptr` could be useful for handling automatic deallocation of
objects created with the `new`
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:16:30 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This is somewhat a continuation for
> [JDK-8307160](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307160) and
> [JDK-8334509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334509).
>
> The former removed the `doIt` flag in #18584, but it introduced a
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:16:30 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This is somewhat a continuation for
> [JDK-8307160](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307160) and
> [JDK-8334509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334509).
>
> The former removed the `doIt` flag in #18584, but it introduced a
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:42:16 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_PrintJob.cpp line 640:
>>
>>> 638: HGLOBAL oldG = AwtPrintControl::getPrintHDMode(env, self);
>>> 639: if (setup.hDevMode != oldG) {
>>> 640:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:37:48 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote:
>> This is somewhat a continuation for
>> [JDK-8307160](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307160) and
>> [JDK-8334509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334509).
>>
>> The former removed the `doIt` flag in #18584, but it introduced a
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:16:30 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This is somewhat a continuation for
> [JDK-8307160](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307160) and
> [JDK-8334509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334509).
>
> The former removed the `doIt` flag in #18584, but it introduced a
This is somewhat a continuation for
[JDK-8307160](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307160) and
[JDK-8334509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334509).
The former removed the `doIt` flag in #18584, but it introduced a regression.
The regression is resolved by the latter in #19786, and
12 matches
Mail list logo