A slight modification, which I think avoids counting each collection
twice:
(defn append-val [val & colls]
(let [lengths (map count colls)
maxlen (apply max lengths)]
(map #(concat %1 (repeat (- maxlen %2) val)) colls lengths)
)
)
On Dec 23, 10:30 am, kyle smith wrote:
> It's a
Help->About says Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Version 9.0.30729.1 SP
OS is Windows 7 Home Premium 6.1
There is a warning 'Project file contains ToolsVersion="4.0", which is
not supported by this version of MSBuild. Treating the project as if
it had ToolsVersion="3.5"'.. I don't know if it has any
On Dec 24, 6:01 pm, Richard Newman wrote:
> > but, I can't seem to do this with the 'inc' function:
>
> > user=> (binding [inc (fn [y] (+ 2 y))] (inc 44))
> > 45
>
> > Why doesn't this work?
>
> Because inc is inlined, and thus isn't mentioned when your binding
> occurs.
Thanks Richardthat'
> but, I can't seem to do this with the 'inc' function:
>
> user=> (binding [inc (fn [y] (+ 2 y))] (inc 44))
> 45
>
> Why doesn't this work?
Because inc is inlined, and thus isn't mentioned when your binding
occurs.
(defn inc
"Returns a number one greater than num."
{:inline (fn [x] `(. c
On a related note, can someone explain the following...
I can define a function 'p1':
user=> (defn p1 [x] (+ 1 x))
#'user/p1
user=> (p1 44)
45
and then shadow it within the binding construct:
user=> (binding [p1 (fn [y] (+ 2 y))] (p1 44))
46
but, I can't seem to do this with the 'inc' function
Wow, Google only gets nine hits on MSB3075. One, possibly relevant,
solved by moving to admin privilege. One, yours. Others, not
relevant. Thus ends my error-resolution attempt!
>From the message, I'm assuming .net 3.5. What flavor of VS?
-David
On Dec 23, 9:21 pm, sriram p c wrote:
> I wa
Thanks to all!
I think I should use another (more fun or irrelevant - based on one's
eye-line!) example for custom "form separators"; something like this:
(switch (choice)
{my-choice
(having-fun)
}
{(your-choice)
(being-pragmatic)
}
{(their-choice)
(lisp
Lisp syntax needs some fixing ?
It's not April 1st yet or did I hibernate through winter suddenly ?
I'll run to the window to see if my tulips
are out
:)))
Luc
Sent from my iPod
On Dec 24, 2009, at 1:58 PM, kaveh_shahbazian wrote:
> Well; this is a fun tradition after all and number o
On Dec 24, 7:08 am, Mike Douglas wrote:
> Previously:
> "Caused by: java.lang.Exception: Assert failed: (= % x)"
With your patch, assert does not include x in its message anymore in
case s is not given. Also, as a non-native speaker I find the phrase
"failed when" somewhat strange to my ears. Asi
That's great too; I think I'll use this instead, since it doesn't
involve unpacking lists. Thanks a lot, both of you.
On Dec 24, 11:39 am, Sean Devlin wrote:
> We could define a fn called take-until
>
> (defn take-until
> [pred coll]
> (take-while (complement pred) coll))
>
> And get the last
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:58 PM, kaveh_shahbazian <
kaveh.shahbaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This has been done in Clojure to some extend for Vectors and Sets.
> What if we could choose a custom separator in out macros? For example
> `begin and `end? This way one can write code in more common flavors
>
> So If I look ridiculous, I apologize in advance.
>
>
Don't worry, you'd be in good company anyway :)
Why don't you implement it and try it? It should be fairly easy to create a
translator that would turn any of those proposals into regular clojure
before compiling. Try it out for a while, see
Well; this is a fun tradition after all and number of participants is
huge! (All failed of-course :) )
Is short idea is:
Having the choice of custom separators.
This has been done in Clojure to some extend for Vectors and Sets.
What if we could choose a custom separator in out macros? For example
We could define a fn called take-until
(defn take-until
[pred coll]
(take-while (complement pred) coll))
And get the last entry of that
user=>(last (take-until odd? [2 4 6 8 9 10 11]))
8
It's based on take-while, so it's lazy.
Sean
On Dec 24, 1:34 pm, Chouser wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 200
Excellent, thank you very much!
On Dec 24, 11:34 am, Chouser wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:24 PM, samppi wrote:
> > I'm having trouble with figuring out something. First, to get the
> > first element of a sequence so that (pred element) is false, you do
> > (first (drop-while pred sequence)
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:24 PM, samppi wrote:
> I'm having trouble with figuring out something. First, to get the
> first element of a sequence so that (pred element) is false, you do
> (first (drop-while pred sequence)). This is lazy, and stops
> immediately when the element is found.
>
> Now, I
I'm having trouble with figuring out something. First, to get the
first element of a sequence so that (pred element) is false, you do
(first (drop-while pred sequence)). This is lazy, and stops
immediately when the element is found.
Now, I want to get the element *right before* the element returne
I am also curious about this. Apologies, possibly naive question
ahead :)
My background is in C++. By choosing to work with immutable values
(i.e. with a lot of consts), I found that I was able to avoid most of
explicit memory management, pointers etc. Exceptions were:
(a) when interfacing wit
Clojure solves this problem in a very simple way: Not at all.
Two Reasons:
There is no way to create a class with private members in clojure.
'private members' exist because of lexical scoping and don't require
special constructs like 'private' etc. (javascript has 'private
members' too because of
Hi,
Am 23.12.2009 um 18:59 schrieb Phil Hagelberg:
>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site:github.com+clojure
>
> Also noteworthy: all Clojure projects on Github sorted by most recent
> activity:
>
> http://github.com/languages/Clojure/updated
>
> That weeds out inactive projects.
Then y
I was trying to build clojure clr.
As given in the instructions, I have unloaded the Tests project.
During compilation of the Coljure.Compile project, I see the following
error on the "Output" window
C:\sriram\work\clojure\clojure-clr\Clojure\Clojure.Compile\bin\Debug
\Clojure.Compile.exe clojure
On Dec 13, 5:24 am, ajay gopalakrishnan wrote:
> It tried the following in REPL and got no error. Personally, I feel that I
> should get an error because calling square on strings is wrong in both
> cases.
>
> Is there a way out of this in Clojure?
I hope you don't mind me bumping this old thread
22 matches
Mail list logo
