Hi,
On Feb 3, 1:54 am, Michał Marczyk wrote:
> Something I wanted to mention is that this could provide a use case
> for an Scheme style cond macro, especially if the processing logic got
> more involved -- have a look at my scond if you'd like:
>
> http://gist.github.com/293212
>
> Basically th
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Rob Wolfe wrote:
> there are needed two things:
>
> 1. maven profile, which will be activated by "-Denv=local"
> 2. dependency defined with "system" scope and "systemPath"
>
> I can not find anything like that in clojure-contrib pom.xml.
> So I added this part to or
On Feb 2, 7:53 pm, Wardrop wrote:
> I feel like I'm over-staying my welcome by posting yet another topic,
> so please only answer if you get some form of enjoyment out of solving
> such problems as this one.
>
> I've given this problem a fair bit of my time, and it's been good so
> far as it's f
Any half-way decent IDE should have a shortcut for resolving wildcard
imports to be fully-qualified.
On Feb 2, 7:31 pm, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found myself a few times in a situation where I'm banging some
> java code into clojure, and the java source uses import foo.* blah.*
> bar
Ouch, just noticed that the counts get accumulated by extension... In
this case it's probably best to add the current size to a counter
stored in the map entry when there's a duplicate. It's a minor tweak,
though.
Sincerely,
Michał
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
How about this for a start?
(reduce
(fn [m line]
(if (empty? line)
m
(if-let [size (get (re-matches #"([0-9]+)
byte\(null\)each:" line) 1)]
(merge m {:size size})
(if-let [file (get (re-matches #".*(\.[0-9a-zA-Z]+)" line) 1)]
I feel like I'm over-staying my welcome by posting yet another topic,
so please only answer if you get some form of enjoyment out of solving
such problems as this one.
I've given this problem a fair bit of my time, and it's been good so
far as it's forced me to learn new things and challenge my ra
Whenever I had to do this, I put the java code in a separate java
file in IntelliJ, and let it figure out the list of imports.
I then paste them into clojure.
Works well since I also use IntelliJ for clojure anyway.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Timothy Pratley
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found my
I've found myself a few times in a situation where I'm banging some
java code into clojure, and the java source uses import foo.* blah.*
bar.* Now Clojure requires explicit class naming (which I fully
support) so I end up spending a good slice of time googling "java
SomeWierdClass someapi" to ge
Hi,
I've found myself a few times in a situation where I'm banging some
java code into clojure, and the java source uses import foo.* blah.*
bar.* Now Clojure requires explicit class naming (which I fully
support) so I end up spending a good slice of time googling "java
SomeWierdClass someapi" t
In teaching people Clojure, non-intuitive behavior with use/require is
the #1 problem for beginners, by a mile. I believe we need both
ordinary function and macro versions, and I am pretty sure that a well-
considered patch implementing this would be accepted.
SS: is require* an acceptable n
Something I wanted to mention is that this could provide a use case
for an Scheme style cond macro, especially if the processing logic got
more involved -- have a look at my scond if you'd like:
http://gist.github.com/293212
Basically this would allow you to write things like
(scond [(re-matches
(some) definitely seems like the way to go. Now I've got to move onto
my next problem, which is totally the number of duplicate files and
the bytes they take up. I'm guessing at this point that something like
(reduce) will be the way to go.
Thanks for all your help. This won't be the last time you
On 3 February 2010 00:50, ataggart wrote:
> It occurs to me you could use 'some instead of nested if-lets:
>
> (some identity
> [(first (re-matches #"([0-9]+) byte\(null\)each:" line))
> (first (re-matches #".*(\.[0-9a-zA-Z]+)" line))])
A simplified version:
(some #(first (re-matches % line))
It occurs to me you could use 'some instead of nested if-lets:
(some identity
[(first (re-matches #"([0-9]+) byte\(null\)each:" line))
(first (re-matches #".*(\.[0-9a-zA-Z]+)" line))])
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to t
On Feb 2, 3:02 pm, Wardrop wrote:
> The problem is, the only output I get is "Finished!". If however, I
> run this on the command line, I get a long list of nil's in amongst
> the strings "Byte pattern!" and "File pattern!". I expect the nil's
> not to show when this is run as a script, but why
Hi,
Am 02.02.2010 um 23:48 schrieb Wardrop:
> (for [line (line-seq (reader "C:\\filedupes.txt"))]
> (cond
>((complement nil?) (re-matches #"([0-9]+) byte\(null\)each:"
> line))
> (println "Byte pattern!")
>((complement nil?) (re-matches #".*(\.[0-9a-zA-Z]+)" line))
> (println "
Haha, I was just trying out traditional formatting with clojure and
had left it that way without noticing.
As for the lazy thing, I should have known that as it wasn't long ago
I was ready about laziness in the book I'm reading. Wrapping (dorun)
around the (for) loop has fixed it.
Could someone n
for is lazy, and your code formatting is horrible.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Wardrop wrote:
> I've noticed that the output of a script, is often different to the
> output of the same commands if run on the REPL. This makes sense, but
> here's a situation which has got me a little confused.
I've noticed that the output of a script, is often different to the
output of the same commands if run on the REPL. This makes sense, but
here's a situation which has got me a little confused. I'm trying to
run this code as a script...
(use '[clojure.contrib.duck-streams])
(for [line (line-seq (r
> > My guess is that the resulting ephemeral garbage would have only a
> > small effect on performance
>
> An interesting data point on ephemeral garbage that was quite
> eye-opening: Somewhere in the talk below, Cliff Click says that the
> problem with high-volume ephemeral garbage lies in the cac
On Feb 1, 6:39 pm, Richard Newman wrote:
> If you're adding a new TransientVector instance on every call to
> conj!, you might as well just use conj.
I think not. The reason building a huge transient vector is faster
than building a huge persistent vector isn't the Vector instance
created by ea
This email was cut-off from what I intended to send, sorry.
What I meant to say, was that, unfortunately the video cuts off after
10 minutes. Are the slides for this talk available somewhere?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Feb 2, 3:44 pm, Aaron Cohen wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I was watching the "Clojure in Cloju
On Feb 2, 2:42 pm, Rob Wolfe wrote:
> In order to use command like this:
>
> mvn -Denv=local -Dclojure.jar=/path/to/clojure.jar package
>
> there are needed two things:
>
> 1. maven profile, which will be activated by "-Denv=local"
> 2. dependency defined with "system" scope and "systemPath"
Whoo
Hey Konrad,
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> I would like to deposit a small library on clojars.org. Is it possible
> to do this without using either Maven or Leiningen? Neither of these
> tools seems to be appropriate for my library.
Sure, you can just write the POM by hand. The reason the POM is
nece
http://clojure.org/libraries is out of date
Gorilla was merged with VimClojure, and I think I saw other
problems...
Also, the organization of this page is messy and could use some
taxonomy help. Reminds me too much of the Eclipse plug-ins page: out
of control.
--
You received this message beca
Hi guys,
I was watching the "Clojure in Clojure" talk that I saw linked from
the "disclojure" blog (very useful to me by the way, thank you
nameless to me person who does it
-- Aaron
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this gr
What is the time and space complexity for your implementation? Equals the
normal non-functional implementation?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:31 AM, e wrote:
> i was messing around a while back with this:
> http://code.google.com/p/jc-pheap/
>
> the algorithms work, but it's probably in a between-sta
Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to package clojure-contrib for Debian and one of the
> debian java packaging practices is that the build should not download
> any external dependencies. All the dependencies should be debian
> packages themselves.
>
> I tried building cloj
Hi,
Am 02.02.2010 um 19:11 schrieb Konrad Hinsen:
> I would like to deposit a small library on clojars.org. Is it possible to do
> this without using either Maven or Leiningen? Neither of these tools seems to
> be appropriate for my library.
>
> My library consists of just a few very small sou
On 2 February 2010 16:05, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>> On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
>> require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
>> parens.
>
> Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not
hi all,
i am new to clojure (and new to this list). i find clojure.org and the
api documentation at github a great resource for learning. however, i
am missing a comprehensive, compact and searchable offline version
(and i did look around).
so i did what i always do in this case [1]: make * a com
And of course, that *does* work, thus my complaint was moot, and the
symbol non-resolution was probably what Stuart was so aghast about
(even though it wasn't my point).
As Michael said: I wish I'd realised that just before posting rather
than just after :)
On Feb 2, 10:50 am, ataggart wrote:
And of course that should be (require '[clojure.contrib string io]) or
(require ['clojure.contrib 'string 'io]) so the symbols don't try to
get resolved.
On Feb 2, 10:41 am, ataggart wrote:
> On Feb 2, 7:05 am, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>
> > On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>
> > > On a related n
On Feb 2, 7:05 am, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>
> > On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
> > require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
> > parens.
>
> Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not
I would like to deposit a small library on clojars.org. Is it possible
to do this without using either Maven or Leiningen? Neither of these
tools seems to be appropriate for my library.
My library consists of just a few very small source code files. It
doesn't need to be AOT compiled, and b
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sean Devlin wrote:
> As most of you know, Oracle is rapidly rebranding the sun website.
> It's a matter of time before they get to the Javadocs. Given the
> following:
>
> 1. Oracle doesn't play nice (putting it lightly)
> 2. Oracle documentation is the WORST on
On Feb 2, 11:42 am, Sean Devlin wrote:
> Does someone know of an alternate place to find Javadocs?
You can (or could) download all the JDK docs as a ZIP. And lots of
places, like university CS departments, mirror the JDK docs. There
are several meta-javadoc search engines, but I find them annoy
Hey everyone,
As most of you know, Oracle is rapidly rebranding the sun website.
It's a matter of time before they get to the Javadocs. Given the
following:
1. Oracle doesn't play nice (putting it lightly)
2. Oracle documentation is the WORST on the planet (again, putting it
lightly)
Does som
On 2 February 2010 17:36, Michael Wood wrote:
> On 2 February 2010 17:05, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>> On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>>> On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
>>> require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
>>> parens.
>>
>> Absolut
On 2 February 2010 17:05, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>> On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
>> require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
>> parens.
>
> Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not
folks may be interested in this thing I was working on a while back for
Dijkstra and Branch and Bound problems: http://code.google.com/p/jc-pheap/.
... I know this was a while ago :)
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:26 PM, David Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:22:47PM -0800, ataggart wrote:
i was messing around a while back with this:
http://code.google.com/p/jc-pheap/
the algorithms work, but it's probably in a between-state. I wasn't sure
what the interface should look like exactly, and I was recently adding
support for duplicate keys (but I wasn't sure if I should have two
struct
On Feb 1, 9:23 pm, OGINO Masanori wrote:
> Can I write a code on both 1.1 and master using duck-streams/io?
For now, yes, as ataggart showed. But I expect names in contrib will
be in flux for the next few weeks, so you should probably pick a
release and stick with it.
-SS
--
You received this
Try adding the "-o" (for offline) option to the Maven command line.
-SS
On Feb 2, 6:20 am, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to package clojure-contrib for Debian and one of the
> debian java packaging practices is that the build should not download
> any external dependenc
On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
> On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
> require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
> parens.
Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not a
macro) is important for code-generating code.
-SS
-
2 ataggart
Ok. I don't explain coorect why I want to have build-in ability to
create reader macro.
In my study and job I very often use different spesific data
structures. It's very useful to have reader macro to work with them,
because it makes my code easilier to perception: work with data
struc
Hi,
On Feb 2, 2:31 pm, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> > Hmm.. I thought of get-in as a recursive application of get. get-in
> > now diverges from get. Maybe this version should be called "unwrap"
> > instead?
>
> Zero applications of get to a map might be thought of as the map itself.
> Are you thinki
On 2 February 2010 17:41, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> I would get rid of the if-let.
Ah yes! Ok patch updated to:
+ ([m ks not-found]
+ (if (seq ks)
+ (get (reduce get m (butlast ks)) (last ks) not-found)
+ m)))
Note that (seq ks) will throw an illegal argument exception if ks is 5
fo
Hi,
On Feb 2, 1:48 pm, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> > If you view 'get-in' as an unwrapping operation, unwrapping by zero steps
> > should return the existing collection, no?
>
> Thanks for that description I completely agree.
Hmm.. I thought of get-in as a recursive application of get. get-in
now
On 2 February 2010 17:55, Richard Newman wrote:
> If you view 'get-in' as an unwrapping operation, unwrapping by zero steps
> should return the existing collection, no?
Thanks for that description I completely agree.
> Can you explain why you think the result should be nil?
I was not thinking
On 2 February 2010 15:39, Praki wrote:
> Does Clojure have a notion of #line directive a la C/C++?
This works for me:
(println "file:" *file* " line:" @(clojure.lang.Compiler/LINE))
> If there is any built-in support in Clojure for ignoring blocks
> delimited by special tags, as in GHC, that wo
I was looking at this aspect of Clojure at the weekend and tried to blog a
couple of simple examples here
(http://clivetong.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!3F21DF299C355E7F!330.entry)
-Original Message-
From: clojure@googlegroups.com [mailto:cloj...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Wardrop
Sent:
The only two lines needed (at least for me) are:
(setq current-language-environment "UTF-8")
(setq slime-net-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
On Jan 20, 1:13 am, Lukas Lehner wrote:
> Hi
>
> using directly (not jline or others)
> although pure REPL would be still fine, I have found how to make it work
Greetings,
Does Clojure have a notion of #line directive a la C/C++?
The reason for my asking is, I am generating Clojure code which is
embedded in TeX and I would like to see Clojure source code references
mapped to that original file.
If there is any built-in support in Clojure for ignoring b
On Feb 2, 3:23 am, ataggart wrote:
> On Feb 2, 12:19 am, "A.Rost" wrote:
>
> > I would like to have them available, simply because I
> > like concise, purpose-built languages.
>
> That seems to presuppose you cannot have concise, purpose-built
> languages with functions and macros. That may be
Thank you. I try to use use function and it works, too.
--
Name: OGINO Masanori (荻野 雅紀)
E-mail: masanori.og...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
On Feb 2, 12:19 am, "A.Rost" wrote:
> I would like to have them available, simply because I
> like concise, purpose-built languages.
That seems to presuppose you cannot have concise, purpose-built
languages with functions and macros. That may be the case, but I'd
like to see some rationale beh
Hi,
I am trying to package clojure-contrib for Debian and one of the
debian java packaging practices is that the build should not download
any external dependencies. All the dependencies should be debian
packages themselves.
I tried building clojure-contrib with mvn -Dclojure.jar= as detailed in
On 2 February 2010 10:27, Michael Wood wrote:
> Of course the above is Unix-centric. On Windows you might not have
> inode numbers (VFAT. Not sure if ntfs has an inode number
> equivalent.) Also, I think I've heard that in Windows you can create
> hard links to directories, so I don't know how
http://briancarper.net/blog/clojure-reader-macros
might interest you.
On 2 February 2010 19:19, A.Rost wrote:
> I would like to have them available, simply because I
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email
On 1 February 2010 15:39, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> The official JMX API is a programmer-usability disaster (IMO), and I wrote
> the contrib jmx wrapper by trial-and-error to get minimal functionality
> working. A few thoughts:
>
> * I will take a look at this (but won't be able to get to it today)
Hi
On 2 February 2010 01:20, rzeze...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> user> (doc and)
> -
> clojure.core/and
> ([] [x] [x & next])
> Macro
> Evaluates exprs one at a time, from left to right. If a form
> returns logical false (nil or false), and returns that value and
> doesn'
On 2 February 2010 10:08, Jeff Rose wrote:
> So what would that look like? Is it sufficient to throw every
> canonical directory path in a set and test for membership before
> traversing down any directory?
Yes, I think so, as long as you can fit all of them in memory.
The other thing you could
Well, clojure provides a variety of reader macro. In fact I don't
think that I would need different ones, but I would like to have them
available, simply because I
like concise, purpose-built languages. Besides I don't think that
user created reader macro would damage because there is practically
So what would that look like? Is it sufficient to throw every
canonical directory path in a set and test for membership before
traversing down any directory? Or is that even sufficient because you
could arrive at the same location through different paths... I wonder
if you can get something more
66 matches
Mail list logo
