IANRH :)
When it's all said done, I'd say 1 to 3 months.
Patches are flying around like crazy right now, and they're mostly
related to getting the last bits pieces in order before an RC. Rich
has mentioned that there's going to a bit longer RC period this time
around, this is to accommodate
On 04.05.2010, at 05:39, David Barksdale wrote:
I tried to define n-times using the pattern of none-or-more and came
to the realization that the state-m-until does not handle a parser
that fails. So here is m-until for the parser monad and my n-times
using it:
That looks like a good
On May 3, 2010, at 10:26 PM, lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca wrote:
Hi all,
it's not that I want to put pressure on anyone here but there has
been a number
of discussions about the 1.2 release and I was wondering what's the
horizon for
a first release ?
We are still in prod with 1.0 but
Dear all,
Is there an equivalent of commute without return value?
A part of the usage of commute just want to change something without
knowing the result.
(For example, I want to extend a set).
I know it is not very expensive but computing twice a function - if
there is a bit of contention, but
On May 4, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Nicolas Oury wrote:
Dear all,
Is there an equivalent of commute without return value?
A part of the usage of commute just want to change something without
knowing the result.
(For example, I want to extend a set).
I know it is not very expensive but computing
Dear all,
I have a problem where a lot of concurrency could be gained by having
a tree of references.
ie a tree where each nodes contain a ref to a set of similar tree.
(I know that having mutable trees is asking for troubles, but that is
quite necessary for the things I wish to do.)
I read
Hi Nicolas,
First to answer, but not necessarily the most accurate answer you'll
get. Be warned ! :-)
You can nest refs into refs. But in that case, don't mismatch the ref
and a particular value of the ref in your mental model.
You will be reminded of this in your code because you'll have to
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Nicolas Oury nicolas.o...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear all,
I have a problem where a lot of concurrency could be gained by having
a tree of references.
ie a tree where each nodes contain a ref to a set of similar tree.
(I know that having mutable trees is asking
In ClojureQL I do not see how to join three or more tables using the
join function. Does anyone know if this is possible?
Thank you.
-David McNeil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
When I here refs of refs, it's a code smell. Granted, sometimes they
are needed, and you very well may have one of those cases. Here's a
few things to consider...
1. Is a tree really the right way to represent your data? Perhaps you
should consider a collection of edges instead. i.e,
I need to write a program that will rephrase an English statement into
a question as many different ways as possible.
Which libraries will be good for creating a simple version of that?
Examples will be nice too.
Thanks a lot.
JT
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I've spent most of the afternoon trying to get swank-clojure to work
for me. I tried ELPA. I tried Lein. I tried directly pulling in the
git repositories.
No matter what I try, I get the following:
java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: with-bindings in
this context
Um, the Clojure 1.1.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT version reported by Clojure in
the above and the svn/tags/1.0 version of Clojure that you mention
lead me to ask:
Where do you get your clojure.jar / Clojure sources from?
These days you're supposed to use one of the following, depending on
your stability
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Patrick Stein p...@nklein.com wrote:
Do I need to use an older version of Clojure instead? I just checked
out Clojure
from the trunk today. Same for swank-clojure (which is where
basic.clj lives).
It doesn't work with svn/tags/1.0 version of Clojure either
I'm not sure how simple this is. If you want the code to be able to take any
English sentence as input, parse it, and reword them as question.
It's far more work than a simple email can convey. :)
You can probably start with the clj-opennlp as the first step
to parse the input.
On Monday, May 3,
Hi,
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 08:37:00AM -0700, David McNeil wrote:
In ClojureQL I do not see how to join three or more tables using the
join function. Does anyone know if this is possible?
No, not yet. However this problem is known and it is being worked on.
For now you have to resort to
I have a macro, deriv, that produces an expression, and I'd like to
create another macro that turns this into a function. So far I have
(defmacro deriv-fn [fn-args exp v degree]
`(fn ~fn-args (deriv ~exp ~v ~degree)))
Which of course doesn't work, since it considers the output of deriv
as a
On 4 May 2010 18:47, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Patrick Stein p...@nklein.com wrote:
Do I need to use an older version of Clojure instead? I just checked
out Clojure
from the trunk today. Same for swank-clojure (which is where
basic.clj lives).
Did you try unquote splicing? i.e.
(defmacro deriv-fn [fn-args exp v degree]
`(fn ~fn-args ~@(deriv exp v degree)))
Also, posting a link your exact macros would help :)
Sean
On May 4, 3:40 pm, Bryce fiat.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a macro, deriv, that produces an expression, and I'd
On May 4, 10:40 pm, Bryce fiat.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a macro, deriv, that produces an expression, and I'd like to
create another macro that turns this into a function. So far I have
(defmacro deriv-fn [fn-args exp v degree]
`(fn ~fn-args (deriv ~exp ~v ~degree)))
Which of
For reference, the deriv macro is at
http://github.com/liebke/incanter/blob/master/modules/incanter-core/src/incanter/symbolic.clj
Unquote splicing and switching to `(fn ~fn-args ~(deriv exp v degree))
both produce errors of the type count not supported on this type:
Symbol. Macroexpand-1 seems
On 2010 May 4, at 4:55 PM, Bryce wrote:
For reference, the deriv macro is at
http://github.com/liebke/incanter/blob/master/modules/incanter-core/src/incanter/symbolic.clj
Unquote splicing and switching to `(fn ~fn-args ~(deriv exp v degree))
both produce errors of the type count not supported
My previous post got lost in a black hole somewhere... so lets type a
shorter version:
Yeppee !
That's a perfect match with my schedule for the next 6 months.
We will launch our new projects under 1.2 and port the existing code to
it in the following weeks.
Our next major deployment toward fall
Huh, that is artful. Looks like I need to get my dev environment in
shape so I can keep up with the changes!
On May 4, 6:57 pm, liebke lie...@gmail.com wrote:
The output is different because you're using my version of the defn-fn
macro, which I checked in late this afternoon.
(def f
24 matches
Mail list logo
