Thanks for the replies guys - has given me things to mull over.
On Thursday, 10 May 2012 22:11:18 UTC+1, Ant wrote:
Hi all,
I am battering my head against the following problem which I'm sure is
straightforward if only I knew how. I want to partition the following
list:
'(aa123 x y z
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 12:44:45 AM UTC-5, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
There are many ways of doing this. One approach that I have seen a lot
is something like this -
;; core.clj
(def ^:dynamic *settings* {:default :stuff}) ;; the default settings can
be nil
I was experimenting
...but Andrew Cooke pointed out that using a global var would preclude you
from being able to use multiple, independent graph instances in your
program, whereas you can in the Python version
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10540999/how-to-configure-a-clojure-library-at-runtime).
And so I
Hi,all
I've implemented a simple DSL for monitoring apps in clojure based on
SSH.
Usage: goog_1871645686https://github.com/killme2008/clj.monitor
An example:
(defcluster mysql
:clients [{:user deploy :host mysql.app.com}])
(defmonitor mysql-monitor
;;Tasks to monitor
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:12:53 AM UTC-5, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
You got the basic idea right, that of creating a lexical closure over
the config map. But I personally don't like the approach of returning
a function that takes a function and applies it over the other args.
I
Hi,
I like the way hiccup allows you to represent html elements as
datastructure. However this is limited to native elements. If you want to
represent custom elements, the solution is to crate a function which will
then spit out the basic html tags that hiccup compiler understands.
It would
I saw this example of a simple closure in Joy of Clojure and on some
Clojure tutorial page.
(defn adder[n]
(let [x n]
(fn[y] (+ y x
Is the let necessary? It seems redundant.
I tried it like this and it seems to work fine.
(defn adder[n]
(fn[y] (+ y n))
--
You received this
It's the same program.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:20 AM, larry larrye2...@gmail.com wrote:
(defn adder[n]
(let [x n]
(fn[y] (+ y x
Is the let necessary? It seems redundant.
Can you provide a specific reference to where the example appears in
Joy of Clojure (page number)? I assume the actual example in
On May 11, 10:02 pm, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
## 2.0.0-preview4 / 2012-05-11
{snip}
* Use Clojure 1.4.0 internally; plugins have access to new Clojure features.
Hi Phil,
After `lein self-install`, when I first ran `lein help` I get this
output:
Aha! Thanks for explaining this here as well as in detail on IRC and
working through it with me. It does indeed make sense.
Furthermore, we've already had this discussion on IRC, but at least one
person thought that my suggestions above were me being a jerk. Just wanted
to publicly state here
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:06 AM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
After `lein self-install`, when I first ran `lein help` I get this
output: https://www.refheap.com/paste/2697. Just a few questions:
* What's the Clojure 1.3.0 jar required for if lein is using 1.4.0 internally?
Some of
Have you seen the recent buzz about java.net.URL's hashCode depending
on the state of the internet[1]?
Can Exploding Fish do something about this annoyance?
[1]:
http://michaelscharf.blogspot.de/2006/11/javaneturlequals-and-hashcode-make.html
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Anthony Grimes
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 6:28:14 PM UTC-4, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
Have you seen the recent buzz about java.net.URL's hashCode depending
on the state of the internet[1]?
Can Exploding Fish do something about this annoyance?
[1]:
On May 12, 4:41 pm, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:06 AM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, I like that you can now pass extra args to `lein new` to
create a project of a specific type (such as plugin). What do you
think of adding 2 more
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 4:07 PM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
* an app would have `:main foo.core` in the project.clj
* an app would have the `-main` function in core.clj
* an app would have a :gen-class in its ns declaration in core.clj
Sure, that makes sense. Feel free to open
On May 12, 7:07 pm, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. Typo:
Another important reason for having a good default README.md template
specifically for libs is that, at some point, I'm guessing that
clojars.org will extract and render them as html, and it will be nice
if there's some
Second thing is your (ns ..) declarations.
I've updated it to use :require instead of :use.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
On 12 May 2012 17:12, Murtaza Husain murtaza.hus...@sevenolives.com wrote:
Instead of that if it allowed an extensible compiler with the same macro
defelem, I could call -
[:link-to {:url http://google.com} Hi this is google]
Will that not be more clojurey :)
That seems more complicated,
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 10:36:35 PM UTC-4, James Reeves wrote:
That seems more complicated, IMO. Why require an custom macro system
when normal functions do the same job? What's the advantage?
The same reason hiccup uses data structures to represent HTML instead
of using nested functions:
As I see it, link-to is a function that saves you a little bit of typing if
you choose to use it.
But if you don't, you could just write [:a {:href blah} Blah] where :a
is exactly :link-to, just spelt differently.
what is proposed above seems to be renaming of elements and attributes -
but
Thats the whole idea. The ability to build abstractions. Currently I have a
host of functions that I have defined for higher level components, which
then return datastructures defined in terms of basic html tags.
It would be a great idea if I could directly represent even custom tags as
the
Hi,
I have an array of maps defined as below -
(def input-boxes [{:name :person/first-name :label-text Full Name
:help-text Please enter your full name as - First Middle Last}
{:name :person/ejamaat :label-text Ejamaat Number
:placeholder-text Ejamaat #}
{:name
23 matches
Mail list logo
