Except of course zip-seq doesn't need the f, acc arguments. Sorry about
that.
On Monday, December 24, 2012 7:18:17 PM UTC-8, Alan Malloy wrote:
>
> Probably better to write it more generally, by creating a seq from a
> zipper and then just using the ordinary reduce function on that zip:
>
> (def
Probably better to write it more generally, by creating a seq from a zipper
and then just using the ordinary reduce function on that zip:
(defn zip-seq [f acc z]
(map node (tree-seq branch? children z)))
(reduce f acc (zip-seq some-zipper))
On Monday, December 24, 2012 6:27:00 PM UTC-8, JvJ w
The other day I wrote this as a utility function because I couldn't find
anything like it in the zipper libary. Am I missing something? Is
something like this implemented somewhere?
(defn
zip-reduce
"Reduce called on a zipper."
[f acc z]
(if (zip/end? z)
acc
(recur f (f acc z)
Shantanu
The best way to get going right now with ClojureCLR is to build it from
source. The following is the process to build ClojureCLR on Linux
(Assuming that the mono development environment is installed).
1. Download:
https://github.com/clojure/clojure-clr/archive/clojure-1.4.1.tar.gz
Thanks guys. I switched to a Linux environment and it works fine.
On Monday, December 24, 2012 3:49:54 AM UTC-8, David Powell wrote:
>
> I can confirm the same problem
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Mark >wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to make my way through the modern-cljs tutorials an
I just wanted to say
"Merry Christmas" to this wonderful community that during this first (half)
year learning clojure is really helping me.
Thanks to everybody and best wishes for the holidays
Simone Mosciatti
PS: Here in Italy is just 0.11 AM of the 25th of December aka Christmas...
--
You
You don't need any of the typehints in your reify body. The compiler infers
argument and return types from the interface definition.
On Monday, December 24, 2012 5:35:35 AM UTC-8, nkonovalov wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have a java interface.
> Something like this this.
>
> public interface ITest {
>
I deleted my answer minutes after posting. The phrase "function argument"
is ambiguous ("argument to function", "argument which is a function") and I
jumped to the wrong conclusion.
On Monday, December 24, 2012 7:00:48 PM UTC+1, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
> He's repeating a function argument, not a
He's repeating a function argument, not a function.
Meikel is correct that the second expression causes (some #{0} ...) to
return nil when number is not a multiple of 3 or 5, and then zero? fails.
As he suggests...
(reduce + (filter (fn [number] (some zero? (map mod (take 2 (repeat
number)) [3 5]
Here's a possible implementation:
(ns macro-test
(:require [clojure.pprint :as p]))
(defn get-args-index [x]
(first (filter identity (map-indexed #(when (vector? %2) %1) x
(defn insert-at [x y i]
(concat (take (inc i) x) (list y) (drop (inc i) x)))
(defmacro reify-with-validation [f i
Ah, cool. This is fixed in leiningen HEAD.
Though "lein ring server" doesn't work in HEAD.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:08 AM, George Oliver wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, December 23, 2012 3:30:53 PM UTC-8, Mark wrote:
>>
>>
>> I figure the reader is trying to load the project.clj but I'm executing
>> f
of course repeat works with functions:
user=> (take 4 (map #(% 4) (repeat inc)))
(5 5 5 5)
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Marko Topolnik
wrote:
> repeat is not supposed to work with functions, but there's repeatedly.
>
>
> On Monday, December 24, 2012 4:20:23 AM UTC+1, Andrew Care wrote:
>>
>
Ah, cool. I can confirm that this works for me in leiningen HEAD.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:08 AM, George Oliver wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, December 23, 2012 3:30:53 PM UTC-8, Mark wrote:
>>
>>
>> I figure the reader is trying to load the project.clj but I'm executing
>> from the project's root di
Hi.
I have a java interface.
Something like this this.
public interface ITest {
void printHello();
void printName(String name);
}
And i get an implementation using reify.
(def impl (reify macrotest.ITest
(^void printHello [this]
(println "Hello world!"))
(^void printName [this ^
You are sort of correct...It's not an *error* per ce (it will still
work) but since you're going through a protocol it is a bit suicidal to
use interop...Just use the protocol... :)
Jim
On 24/12/12 12:52, Christian Sperandio wrote:
I thought the import was enough.
And my error with the "." c
I thought the import was enough.
And my error with the "." came from the fact Component is a compiled
class and I believed I had to follow the Java standard writing.
Thank for your help.
On 12/24/2012 01:42 PM, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
Lose the "." - call children? like this: (children? c) an
Lose the "." - call children? like this: (children? c) and make sure you
can see the test-record.component namespace from your user ns (apart
from importing the record class).
HTH,
Jim
On 24/12/12 11:55, Christian Sperandio wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing the use of records in Clojure and I have som
Hi,
I'm testing the use of records in Clojure and I have some issues when I try
to call function of another namespaces from the record.
For testing purposes, I defined this record:
(ns test-record.component
(:use test-record.utils))
(defprotocol Hierarchical
"Protocol for tree."
(childre
I can confirm the same problem
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Mark wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to make my way through the modern-cljs tutorials and running
> into a blocker: I'm on tutorial 2 (
> https://github.com/magomimmo/modern-cljs/blob/master/doc/tutorial-02.md?.mdown)
> and when I try
I've been moving house for the last week or so but I'll also give the
benchmark another look.
My initial profiling seemed to show that the parallel version was spending
a significant amount of time in java.lang.isArray,
clojush.pushstate/stack-ref is calling nth on the result of cons, since it
i
20 matches
Mail list logo
