On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 2:06:34 AM UTC+2, Ben wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Dragan Djuric drag...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
And in this case you have to explicitly specify which monad you want to
use, every time you call bind. I understand that in some case it might be a
The specific bind implementations always get the instance of the Monad
protocol the bind was called with (since it is a part of an implementation
of the Monad protocol), so you use that instance as a first argument to
pure.
Of course, if you call bind with a function that does not make sense
Hey guys!
I've been working on a small library to make writing SQL queries a little
bit easier. It's along the same lines as ClojureQL, but takes a different
approach and compiles into quite different SQL in the end.
At the moment it's quite immature, but it should be able to support any
queries
Hi,
I read recently on the internet that Clojure concurrency tools make it easy
to implement a highly concurrent system but on a single machine.
But how to implement a highly concurrent system that runs on a multiple
machines?
Erlang, Elixir and Scala have the Actors model.
Please correct me
After following Jason's suggestion to use BigInteger and .multiply
instead of BigInt and * I too am getting speed on par with Java (108-109
miroseconds on my RPI). Therefore, I consider this issue closed :)
@Stuart
thanks for running the benchmark yourself...maybe I could have save you
Hello Andy,
Thanks for getting back to me.
The problem is that I specifically need to build Clojure 1.1 which doesn't
seem to have the io.clj in neither clojure nor clojure-contrib. Disabling
the JIT compiler (-Xnojit to JVM Arguments), I was able to build both
successfully with IBM JDK
Brenton has been working hard at preparing a full tutorial of pedestal-app.
We're expecting to release that in just under a month or so.
Great news!
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
It's so close I can almost taste it. Most Relevance Pedestallions are going to
be doing what I think is a final review on Friday.
I really think you folks are going to enjoy it.
-- Ryan Neufeld
On Jul 3, 2013, at 6:47 AM, Leon Talbot leontal...@gmail.com wrote:
Brenton has been working hard
Looking forward to an elaborate docs/video tuts on pedestal.
Cheers
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Ryan Neufeld r...@thinkrelevance.comwrote:
It's so close I can almost taste it. Most Relevance Pedestallions are
going to be doing what I think is a final review on Friday.
I really think you
Docs first, videos in a bit. I don't want this to be like that Christmas where
you thought you were going to get *all* the presents and you were all
disappointed but had to put on a brave face to seem like you still appreciated
it.
-- Ryan Neufeld
On Jul 3, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Mayank Jain
This looks fantastic.
I probably won't be able to resist to type check it with core.typed at some
point.
And enough documentation to satisfy Michael Klishin? I'm impressed :)
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com wrote:
I am pleased to announce a
Sure :)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Ryan Neufeld r...@thinkrelevance.comwrote:
Docs first, videos in a bit. I don't want this to be like that Christmas
where you thought you were going to get *all* the presents and you were all
disappointed but had to put on a brave face to seem like you
I probably won't be able to resist to type check it with core.typed at
some point.
If you contribute that, or help me baking in (some) non-invasive type
checking into Fluokitten, that would be FANTASTIC! I have that in vague
long-term plans, but I haven't had time to look at core.typed
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com wrote:
I probably won't be able to resist to type check it with core.typed at
some point.
If you contribute that, or help me baking in (some) non-invasive type
checking into Fluokitten, that would be FANTASTIC! I have that in
2013/7/3 Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com
one of the main project goals is to make monads (et al) approachable for
beginners, and for that, docs and tutorials are the main thing. So, this
library really does not make much sense without lots of documentation. I
hope to even improve it on that
Michael,
The site source is in the gh-pages branch in the main source repository on
github: https://github.com/uncomplicate/fluokitten/tree/gh-pages
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 2:19:07 PM UTC+2, Michael Klishin wrote:
2013/7/3 Dragan Djuric drag...@gmail.com javascript:
one of the main
2013/7/3 Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com
The site source is in the gh-pages branch in the main source repository on
github: https://github.com/uncomplicate/fluokitten/tree/gh-pages
It's worth mentioning somewhere. ClojureWerkz projects link to doc source
at the top of every guide,
adding a
I'd like to hear others opinions on this too. I don't believe Clojure has
anything built in at this point. My plan of action (not yet implemented) is
to use gearman(possibly java, but it seems that it is no longer updated)
and zeroconf for clusters (just for automatic master determination).
I
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 2:06:34 AM UTC+2, Ben wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Dragan Djuric drag...@gmail.com wrote:
And in this case you have to explicitly specify which monad you want to
use, every time
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
However, I think this, regarding the second law, is telling: The second
does not too, since it says what happens when you bind with (pure m) not
(pure n)
*all* the laws only say what happen when you stay within the same
clj-zookeeper + avout. We run our solution on clusters of small nodes, we needed
a lightweight solution. We implemented cluster queues and use avout locking.
Our configuration is also stored in zookeeper as clojure expressions.
We isolated this in a coordinator module so nothing spills out in the
Monads as a Haskell construct is what the previously mentioned laws
describe. Monads in category theory are defined in a category X as a triple
(T, n, m) where T is a functor and m and n certan natural transformations
such that certan diagrams commute. In that sense, I am not sure that even
That's really nice.
It would be good to have an option to *not* pick up parameter names; I
often refer to these in doc strings, and they are not always spelling
mistakes.
Phil
Gabriel Horner gabriel.hor...@gmail.com writes:
Introducing lein-spell, https://github.com/cldwalker/lein-spell - a
I've never really used monads or monoids, but one thing that does
confuse me is how come there are so may libraries for supporting them.
I've been reading the documentation of morph
(https://github.com/blancas/morph) recently, which is the first one I've
understood. A quick look at fluokitten
If Clojure has all of the Haskell's type features, I guess there would be
only one Clojure monad library, more or less a direct port of Haskell's. As
Clojure is different, there are different ways to approach monads from
neither of which can be the same as Haskell's, each having its pros and
I'm sure I will :) In the meantime, I'll dive in the Application Overview
section to wrap my head around all the moving parts. Loving it so far! Nice
job.
Il giorno mercoledì 3 luglio 2013 13:08:11 UTC+2, Ryan Neufeld ha scritto:
It's so close I can almost taste it. Most Relevance
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2013 16:49:43 UTC+2 schrieb Dragan Djuric:
Monads as a Haskell construct is what the previously mentioned laws
describe. Monads in category theory are defined in a category X as a triple
(T, n, m) where T is a functor and m and n certan natural transformations
Yep. I hadn't got around to that but it's definitely possible with :arglists
I've added a ticket to track it if anyone gets to it before I do -
https://github.com/cldwalker/lein-spell/issues/4
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Phillip Lord
phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.ukwrote:
That's really
Yes, I agree completely, when we stay inside Haskell. However, Clojure is
dynamic. Here are two objects that are equal despite having different types:
Consider this case:
(= [1] (list 1))
;= true
(isa? (type [1]) (list 1))
;= false
In fact, equality in Java (and Clojure) depends on the
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I agree completely, when we stay inside Haskell. However, Clojure is
dynamic. Here are two objects that are equal despite having different types:
If you're going to talk about category theory concepts, then that's
If you're going to talk about category theory concepts, then that's the
constraint you have to operate under. monad is constituted by the laws,
the laws involve operations with a certain type, and that's just it. It's
not a matter of being in Haskell or not, it's a matter of accurately
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com wrote:
Monads as a Haskell construct is what the previously mentioned laws
describe. Monads in category theory are defined in a category X as a triple
(T, n, m) where T is a functor and m and n certan natural transformations
I know there's a pedestal-users mailing list, and I sent my question to it, but
for whatever reason it hasn't shown up there (perhaps it's still in the
moderation queue?). Hopefully someone here might be able to help.
On this page: http://pedestal.io/documentation/application-introduction/
This is with 0.2.0-rc2.
This expression evaluates as expected:
user (m/match [:r :d]
[:s :d] nil
[:r :t] nil
[:r :d] :x
[:s :t] nil)
:x
But this one throws an exception:
user (m/match [:r :d]
[:r :t] nil
Thanks for the report, that's definitely a bug and I know the cause:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/MATCH-80
David
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
This is with 0.2.0-rc2.
This expression evaluates as expected:
user (m/match [:r :d]
(defn indexed
Returns a lazy sequence of [index, item] pairs, where items come
from 's' and indexes count up from zero.
(indexed '(a b c d)) = ([0 a] [1 b] [2 c] [3 d])
[s]
(map vector (iterate inc 0) s))
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
0.2.0-rc3 going out with a fix.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:14 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the report, that's definitely a bug and I know the cause:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/MATCH-80
David
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com
Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:44 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
0.2.0-rc3 going out with a fix.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:14 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for the report, that's definitely a bug and I know the cause:
38 matches
Mail list logo
